Executive Search · Established 1996

The right people.
The right approach.

Thirty years recruiting Senior Manager to Board level appointments, from blue-chip multinationals to owner managed businesses.

30Years of search
£60k+Minimum appointment range
12Months placement indemnity
2006Video presentation pioneers
01

Thirty years, same hands

You know what you are getting when you work with Nevard Roland: honest endeavour, integrity, professionalism and a commitment to see a task through to the end.

Client testimonial
30years, same hands

Both founding directors still operate at the heart of the business. What they do has a major impact on the clients who retain them, and on the lives of the people they recruit.

Ready when you are

Discuss a current or future recruitment need

About us · Established 1996

Executive search with the founders still in the room

A Bristol firm with a national reach, built on long relationships rather than transactions.

01

The firm

Established in Bristol in 1996, Nevard Roland recruits Senior Manager to Board level appointments for clients from blue-chip multinationals through to PE funded and owner managed businesses.

1996Established
UK & EUActive across
£60k+Minimum appointment range
02

What we stand for

I

Integrity

Every commitment is kept: honest endeavour.

II

Professionalism

A method proven over thirty years, from brief to placement.

III

Pragmatism

Useful, argued recommendations. No jargon.

IV

Lasting relationships

People followed over years, not transactions.

03

In their words

If it was not for the speed of action shown by Nevard Roland in finding the right Chief Executive for this company then the implications for the stakeholders were dire. The business is now on the right track.

Chairman, Private Equity group, Hi-tech Equipment

We needed a speedy, covert recruitment exercise to deliver an MD into a poorly performing division. The brief was tight yet Nevard Roland came up with an individual who met the requisite criteria to the letter.

Retained client
Continue For clients

Client zone · For employers

The appointment your business cannot afford to get wrong

Retained search with fees structured in a manner that demands performance by us.

01

What you retain us for

Senior Manager to Board level appointments, typically from £60k and with no upper limit, for clients from blue-chip multinationals through to PE funded and owner managed businesses. Your details are handled confidentially by a professional consultant, never by a database.

VettedFull references on every shortlist
12Months placement indemnity
2006Video shortlist pioneers
02

How the search runs

Retained, visible from day one, supported by video presentation since 2006.

1

The brief

We take time to understand the role, the culture and what success looks like before anything goes to market.

2

The search

In house research, proactive search and creative advertising identify and qualify the candidate population.

3

The shortlist

Candidates meet the consultant first. The shortlist reaches you in our profile format, supported by video presentation, a routine we pioneered in 2006.

4

The appointment

Full references with candidate consent, offer management, and follow up through onboarding. Placement indemnity of up to 12 months.

03

Recent completed assignments

A selection across sectors and functions.

Chief Executive Modular Buildings

Managing Director Industrial Couplings

Managing Director Retail Pharmacy

MD Germany Access Controls

MD USA Sport Equipment

Finance Director Consumer Products

Finance Director Test Equipment

Sales Director Consumer Electronics

Sales Director Building Products

Head of Sales PowerGen Equipment

Marketing Director Retail

Operations Director Building Products

Engineering Director Thermodynamics

Engineering Director Wearable Technology

Supply Chain Director Consumer Plastics

Technical Director Lighting

Head of Quality Sensors

HR Director Electrical Manufacturing

HR Director Infrastructure Products

HR Director Aerospace

IT Director Housing Association

Head of Legal Industrial Seals

04

Starting a search

One conversation is enough to begin. Tell us the role, the company and the location; a consultant takes it from there, in confidence.

Continue Contact us

Candidate zone · In confidence

Your next move, handled properly

You meet the consultant first. Nothing moves without your consent.

01

How we work with you

Confidential, honest advice on your next move, whether we approached you or you came to us. Your details are handled by a professional consultant and never released without your consent.

1

The conversation

You meet the consultant first. We take the time to understand your track record and what you actually want next.

2

Your profile

You are presented under our Candidate Profile format: your own words, professionally set, never a raw CV forward.

3

Video presentation

Where it helps, a short video presentation accompanies your profile, a routine we pioneered in 2006.

4

Consent throughout

Nothing moves without you. References are only taken with your explicit consent, at the right moment.

02

A relationship, not a transaction

They recruited for me in a number of business functions and displayed an innate awareness of identifying people who could not only do the job but fitted in with the culture of the business. When I later became redundant they found me my next position.

Human Resources Director, FMCG
03

Register confidentially

Send your CV with a note on what you are looking for. A consultant reads every submission; we come back to you when there is something genuinely worth your time.

Continue Contact us

Contact · Five offices

Discuss a current or future recruitment need

One conversation is enough to begin, in confidence.

Speak to a consultant

Call the nearest office or write to us. Your details will be handled confidentially by a professional consultant.

Bristol · Head office

0117 311 1222

14 Bellevue Mansions, Bellevue Rd, Clevedon, Bristol BS21 7NU

Manchester

0161 228 6414

Write to us

wizard@nevardroland.co.uk

A consultant reads every message.

Continue Back to home

Current Assignments · Retained

Roles we are searching for now

A selection of current retained assignments. Every search is handled in confidence by a founding consultant.

Live searches

Senior Manager to Board level appointments across sectors. If a role fits, one conversation is enough to begin.

ContinueFor candidates

Current Assignment · Ref 300424

Business Development Director

Intelligent Traffic Management Solutions · Berkshire

Reference300424
CategoryIntelligent Traffic Management Solutions
SalaryC£100k base, plus bonus etc.
LocationBerkshire

We are conducting a retained search for a Business Development Director within Intelligent Traffic Management Solutions, based in Berkshire.

The appointment is offered at C£100k base, plus bonus etc.. Full details are shared with suitable candidates in confidence.

To register your interest, contact a consultant quoting reference 300424.

ContinueBack to assignments

Current Assignment · Ref 300422

Finance Director

Finance · United Kingdom

Reference300422
CategoryFinance
SalarySee Job Description
LocationUnited Kingdom

We are conducting a retained search for a Finance Director within Finance, based in United Kingdom.

The appointment is offered at See Job Description. Full details are shared with suitable candidates in confidence.

To register your interest, contact a consultant quoting reference 300422.

ContinueBack to assignments

Current Assignment · Ref 14690

HR Director

Infrastructure Products · Cheshire

Reference14690
CategoryInfrastructure Products
Salary£100k
LocationCheshire

We are conducting a retained search for a HR Director within Infrastructure Products, based in Cheshire.

The appointment is offered at £100k. Full details are shared with suitable candidates in confidence.

To register your interest, contact a consultant quoting reference 14690.

ContinueBack to assignments

Current Assignment · Ref 190824

Managing Director

Manufacturing/Materials Processing · South Wales

Reference190824
CategoryManufacturing/Materials Processing
Salaryc£150 to 200k Package
LocationSouth Wales

Gwent, S. Wales                              Engineered Products                  £200k package

Our client (T/O c.£15m) has been producing high quality engineered products for over 100 years for its global customer base.

With manufacturing facilities in the UK, the channels to market include distributors, OEMs and direct. The products are used in a variety of sectors which include power transmission & materials handling.

This role reports to the Divisional MD and has overall responsibility for all commercial and operational activities.

The Role:

  • Direct all aspects of business activity in a manner that secures the achievement of revenue and profit objectives.
  • Review operating costs and procedures, recommend measures that improve efficiency in tandem with initiatives that further strengthen market opinion of product from a quality engineering perspective.
  • Promote the company’s capability through high profile marketing campaigns and personal involvement in major customer relationship management activity.
  • Manage and motivate a committed team through effective leadership that promotes a collaborative workplace culture and a ‘total customer focus’.

The Candidate:

  • Graduate calibre with an engineering orientation. Must have a minimum of 3 years in a role carrying full p&l responsibility, i.e. both commercial & operational.
  • Sector experience should include working for a manufacturer supplying into at least one of the aerospace, defence or energy sectors
  • First class communication skills can manage strategic vision alongside a hands-on practicality in controlling day to day operations.
  • Highly numerate and therefore comfortable with a corporate focus on data based decision making

Can inspire local team as an energetic leader and contribute at divisional level as a provider of intelligent input on broader business issues.

ContinueBack to assignments

Current Assignment · Ref 060924

Chief Finance Officer

Manufacturing · Wiltshire

Reference060924
CategoryManufacturing
Salaryc£200k Plus Benefits
LocationWiltshire

We are conducting a retained search for a Chief Finance Officer within Manufacturing, based in Wiltshire.

The appointment is offered at c£200k Plus Benefits. Full details are shared with suitable candidates in confidence.

To register your interest, contact a consultant quoting reference 060924.

ContinueBack to assignments

Current Assignment · Ref 100824

European Sales Manager

Monitoring Equipment · West Midlands

Reference100824
CategoryMonitoring Equipment
Salaryc£80k Package
LocationWest Midlands

About the job

East Midlands Automotive Products £100k base plus benefits

Our client is a PE- backed manufacturing business supplying both OEMs and the aftermarket.

With extensive manufacturing capability the business can satisfy customer specific solutions alongside its off the shelf range.

A key member of the leadership team, the role reports to a commercially oriented MD.

The Role:

  • Formulate and implement the operations strategy for the business that will provide a competitive advantage and deliver world class service.
  • Management of the full supply chain (Purchasing, Planning, Production & Logistics) to optimise working capital whilst giving the required service levels.
  • KPI Performance management.
  • Management of the EH&S standards plus Manufacturing Engineering
  • Provide strong leadership for the operations team and create a highly motivated and skilled workforce.

The Candidate:

  • Degree qualified in Engineering/Manufacturing or similar disciplines, or equivalent industrial experience.
  • Minimum of 5 years operational leadership experience within a manufacturing environment that ideally will have encompassed metal forming and vacuum formed plastic mouldings and assemblies.
  • First class verbal and written skills are taken as read. Likewise, a high degree of numeracy and the ability to take decisions rather than prevaricate.
  • A natural leader who sets an example and inspires confidence by creating a vision for the team.
ContinueBack to assignments

Blog · Market & hiring

Notes on leadership, hiring and the market

Commentary and market news from the Nevard Roland team.

7 April 2026

Dry promotions, benefits-maxxing and Lobster learning: the viral job trends to know about to boost your career and pay

A new wave of viral workplace trends is changing how people think about career growth, pay rises and job security. Popularised on social media and increasingly…

Read
7 April 2026

The Gen Z job crisis is real: 1.2 million recent grads in the U.K. competed for just 17,000 open roles

Gen Z is often derided as a lazy, unambitious generation of workers uninterested in climbing the corporate ladder. But contrary to popular belief, they’re just as…

Read
7 April 2026

Full list of 8 major rule changes for UK workers as raft of new rights kicks in

UK Workers Gain New Rights as Major Rule Changes Take Effect Millions of workers across the UK are set to benefit from a sweeping set of employment law reforms that…

Read
7 April 2026

Email to employee goes viral: HR tracks minutes, Internet tracks the drama

A workplace incident involving a UK-based entrepreneur, Tom Hunt, has captured widespread attention online after he shared an amusing yet baffling corporate email.…

Read
1 December 2025

Will we have any workplace leaders left by 2030?

Our latest Work Remastered research suggests that leadership is losing its allure. Only a quarter of workers (23%) say they are motivated by the promise of…

Read
1 December 2025

Unemployment hits post-pandemic peak

Unemployment in the UK rose to 5% in the three months to the end of September, according to new figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) released…

Read
1 December 2025

Young expats reveal their reasons for fleeing Starmer’s Britain

Why we’ve left the UK…and won’t be coming back: Spiralling living costs, a nation divided, and because ‘everything is always broken’ Young expats today revealed…

Read
1 December 2025

UK firms plan 3% pay rises in coming year, see AI hit to jobs, survey shows

LONDON, Nov 10 (Reuters), British employers expect to raise wages by 3% in the next 12 months, but some recruiters expect artificial intelligence to shrink their…

Read
1 October 2025

Is the AI bubble about to burst?

While the HR hype around AI shows no sign of slowing, the volume of its critics is increasing. Dan Cave explores what HR really needs to know, and be mindful of,…

Read
1 October 2025

Overcome the challenges of executive hiring

Executive-level hiring is fraught with challenges. While successfully identifying the best experienced talent is tricky enough, moving through an onboarding process…

Read
1 October 2025

Sheffield United reappoints club manager: How to rehire talent

Chris Wilder has been reappointed as manager of Sheffield United after Rubén Sellés was dismissed, the club announced on Monday (15 September). Wilder was…

Read
1 October 2025

Survey finds 42% of workers feel overlooked

More than four in ten UK employees (42%) say they feel undervalued at work, according to research findings published by employee benefits platform Perkbox on…

Read
3 June 2025

Half of Employees Distrust Leadership’s Balance of Business and Wellbeing

Half (46%) of UK employees don’t trust leaders to balance business needs with employee wellbeing, according to research findings published today (15 May). Three in…

Read
3 June 2025

Hiring Confidence at a Record Low, as Redundancies Rise

Employer hiring confidence is at a record low, and redundancies are on the rise, the CIPD’s research findings suggest. Overall net employment balance (NEB), the…

Read
3 June 2025

Is it ever worth revenge quitting your job?

You’ve been working from home for half of the week since the pandemic, but your boss has decided everyone needs to return to the office full-time. There doesn’t…

Read
3 June 2025

Avoiding Confrontation, The most common ‘polite-isms’

Revealed: The most common ‘polite-isms’ Britons use to avoid confrontation, and what they REALLY mean From bad teeth to stiff upper lips, many dated stereotypes…

Read
20 March 2025

Questions to ASK at interview

Don’t waste this opportunity to impress! Ask these instead: ➟ What does success look like in the first 90 days? ➟ What are the biggest challenges facing the team…

Read
20 March 2025

10 Signs of a Bad Manager!

Here’s how to recognize it: Poor leadership can cost you your happiness and growth.Here’s how to spot the red flags early. These signs can save your career and…

Read
20 March 2025

Brace yourself: reward storm incoming

In even the most optimistic assessment of the current situation, it is hard to foresee a situation where a substantial portion of workers are not left underwhelmed…

Read
20 March 2025

One in five employees are fully engaged at work

More than one in five (21%) UK employees are fully engaged at work, new research has highlighted. Employee engagement in the UK has increased by 3% from 2024 and is…

Read
13 December 2024

How to spot AI-generated text at work

At the CIPD’s annual conference on 7 November, lexicologist Susie Dent explained how to spot AI-generated text at work. “It is difficult to spot AI-generated text,”…

Read
13 December 2024

How to navigate Christmas parties under the new Worker Protection Act

When planning this year’s festive parties, employers must navigate additional legal complexities. The festive season is upon us and many businesses across the…

Read
13 December 2024

FTSE 100 board director pay gap narrows

The gender pay gap for board directors of FTSE 100 companies has narrowed slightly in the last year, according to research by law firm Fox and Partners, published…

Read
13 December 2024

How communication skills transform workplace stress

Workplace stress is something almost all of us feel. While awareness of mental health issues has grown in recent years, the impact of stress at work remains a major…

Read
25 October 2024

Chief Financial Officer

Ref: 150626 Category: Manufacturing Salary: C.£130k + benefits Location: Warwickshire

Read
1 October 2024

The great office return

As the world grapples with the future of work, major corporations like Amazon, THG, and Salesforce are making bold moves to bring employees back to the office…

Read
1 October 2024

Depression causes employees to move to less stressful jobs

A third (33%) of people with depression reported they have quit their job due to their condition, a report by mental health treatment provider Flow Neuroscience…

Read
1 October 2024

Are we sleepwalking into wellbeing washing?

Wellbeing washing is when companies say all the right things on LinkedIn, but don’t genuinely care about their employees’ wellbeing. Instead, they implement cheap,…

Read
1 October 2024

Is the ‘big stay’ over?

As the economy begins to recover, we asked HR leaders whether the ‘big stay’, a time when employee turnover and vacancies decreased, is really over. Around half…

Read
15 May 2024

HR has an AI-powered disability problem

Unless the unintended consequences of AI-powered HR technology are urgently addressed, hundreds of millions worldwide face lifetimes of economic and societal…

Read
15 May 2024

Employees “don’t seem interested” in benefits on offer

Almost half (48%) of HR directors have reported that employee benefits have had poor uptake because employees “don’t seem interested” in what is on offer. As part…

Read
15 May 2024

Mental health days: do they work?

Employees of the Chinese supermarket chain Pang Dong Lai have been offered up to 10 days of “unhappiness leave”, The Guardian reported. Should UK businesses offer a…

Read
15 May 2024

What Are C Level and C Suite Positions?

Understanding the significance of C-level or C-suite positions is vital if you’re interested in leadership within organisations. These roles, from Chief Executive…

Read
21 March 2024

Ghosting isn’t just for dating anymore

Gen Zers are treating employers like bad dates: 93% ghost interviews and 87% have not even shown up for their first day of work. Most Gen Zers admit to having…

Read
21 March 2024

Burnout affects a fifth of UK employees as long-term sick hits record high

A third (35%) of adults experienced high or extreme levels of pressure and stress ‘always’ or ‘often’ in the past year. Research from Mental Health UK found that…

Read
21 March 2024

Your Boss Is Leaving for Another Job. Should You Follow?

When your boss leaves for a new company, it can be tempting to try to follow them, especially if you’ve had a strong working relationship and built up trust. But is…

Read
21 March 2024

Quarter of employees do not trust their CEO

Over a quarter (26%) of employees do not trust their CEO to be honest and transparent, according to HR software company Personio. The research found 28% of…

Read
7 December 2023

Navigating the mental health maze: the corporate world’s new challenge

Although you won’t see government ministers doing daily TV briefings about it, we are currently in a ‘second pandemic’. This time, though, its effect is mostly…

Read
7 December 2023

Hot topic: When is drug testing fair?

Athletes, police officers and members of the armed forces have historically been drug tested, but employers in other sectors are beginning to follow the practice.…

Read
7 December 2023

Remote jobs flooded with applicants as majority of recruiters struggle

A study found 305 workers apply to every remote job advert, while three quarters of employers struggle to fill vacancies, according to flexible working…

Read
7 December 2023

Flexibility | Workers want a four-day week, but only if they continue to work remotely

75% of workers say that they’ll only be interested in a four-day week if remote work is allowed “all or nearly all of the time”. In the survey from Morning Consult,…

Read
10 October 2023

Show us the money! Is the UK falling behind on pay transparency?

With the Times reporting that over half of UK job adverts do not display salary or pay brackets, could the push for pay transparency be over? Research conducted by…

Read
10 October 2023

Degrees may no longer be a requirement as skills-based hiring surges

LinkedIn data shows a 90% increase in the share of UK job postings not requiring a degree between 2022 and 2021. Recruiters are now five times more likely to search…

Read
10 October 2023

Sick leave hits 10-year high in cost of living crisis

UK employees missed work for an average of 7.8 days over the past year, the highest level in over a decade, according to new research. Over 76% reported…

Read
10 October 2023

Almost one in FOUR people think a job interview is less stressful than selling their motor

What’s the most stressful thing you can do? Move house? Organise a wedding? Maybe do your taxes or take an exam? Well, it’s true that these can induce anxiety, but…

Read
29 August 2023

Planned redundancies rocket for 2023

The number of planned redundancies in the UK rocketed by 54% in the 12 months ending 31 July, according to new research. Successive rises in interest rates have…

Read
29 August 2023

Chat GPT may be banned in some UK organisations

Two thirds (66%) of organisations in the UK are implementing or considering bans on generative AI applications within the workplace, according to a survey of IT…

Read
29 August 2023

UK lags behind US on AI adoption at work

UK office workers are lagging behind their American counterparts when it comes to adopting AI in the workplace, research has revealed. Nearly half (46%) of US…

Read
2 March 2023

How to decide between job offers

Feelings about what is left behind and fears about what may lie ahead can stifle life and career choices. When it is time to shift and decide which job offer is…

Read
2 March 2023

Don’t use colour on your resume, unless they’re ‘hiring you for your creativity’

When writing a resume, there are multiple expert tips to consider. Make sure to mirror the language in the job description if it’s relevant to your experience. Use…

Read
2 March 2023

Knowing when to step down as a leader

Jacinda Arden has announced she is stepping down as prime minister of New Zealand, leaving us with powerful words on leadership: “I hope I leave behind a belief…

Read
2 March 2023

Using a Diversity Dictionary to overcome fear of saying the wrong thing

The benefits of a business with people from different backgrounds are clear. Not only does it bring diversity of thought and allow people to learn from different…

Read
9 December 2022

Employee experience better incentive than bonuses

Organisations such as Barclays, Lloyds Group, Virgin Money and British Airways have offered their staff one-off bonus payments to help with soaring living costs,…

Read
9 December 2022

Exit interview insights are going to waste

Your organisation is leaking top talent assets through exit interviews. Let’s assume your organisation doesn’t have exit interviews in place; the companies wouldn’t…

Read
9 December 2022

Employee experience trends for 2023

While it’s difficult to predict any specific event, one thing we can predict is that through 2023 and beyond, business and employees will face ongoing disruption.…

Read
9 December 2022

12 Terrible Interview Behaviours that Could be Sabotaging your Hiring Process…

The internet is absolutely jam-packed full of guidance on how not to botch a job interview, as a candidate. However, other than the many articles illuminating the…

Read
10 October 2022

Most popular work perks revealed

Overtime pay has pipped a four-day week, flexible working and remote work as the most popular workplace benefit. According to a survey of the top 10 employee…

Read
10 October 2022

Why the four-day week won’t work

Over 3,300 employees from 70 different companies are currently participating in a UK trial of a four-day working week. There is, however, divided opinion as to…

Read
10 October 2022

The 10 most common misspellings on CVs

The 10 most common misspellings on CVs, including ‘experienced’ and ‘successful’, and the 10 overused words to avoid Getting your CV right is key to finding a job…

Read
10 October 2022

CVs branded outdated by younger workers

Many young workers are finding CVs an obstacle to finding their dream job, with 43% saying they are an outdated recruitment model, according to research from…

Read
13 July 2022

8 in 10 of the UK’s most popular jobs have a gender pay gap

Eight in 10 of the UK’s most popular job roles have a gender pay gap in favour of men, new data has found. This is according to CIPHR, which has reviewed the latest…

Read
13 July 2022

Frustrated home workers in danger of causing IT ‘security crisis’

Stringent security measures were an immediate concern in the move to home working, as gaining access to sensitive information and work-based discussions progressed…

Read
13 July 2022

Commuting costs stop workers from returning to office

The cost of commuting is drastically impacting the number of workers heading back to the office. Research from YouGov and spend management solutions company Emburse…

Read
13 July 2022

Proximity bias stopping employers from finding new talent

Companies equating hard work with being in the office are living in the past according to Paul Hamer, CEO of construction company Sir Robert McAlpine. Speaking on a…

Read
16 December 2021

Hiring over-70s could add BILLIONS to UK economy

Hiring over-70s could add BILLIONS to UK economy and create ‘vibrant’ workforce One in ten over-70s are choosing to either head back to or stay longer in part or…

Read
16 December 2021

A quarter of workers judge colleagues on their appearance

A quarter (25%) of workers ranked appearance as the most important factor when meeting someone for the first time at work, followed by personal hygiene (23%) and…

Read
16 December 2021

I don’t care what time you start work

IBM chief tells staff ‘I don’t care what time you start work’. The head of one of the world’s leading tech firms has denounced rigid work structures by revealing he…

Read
16 December 2021

The worst workplace emails you can send

Work emails are a nuisance for most employees; whether they are to chase a colleague on a task, to set out a meeting agenda or prompt a client to get in touch,…

Read
ContinueStart a search

Blog · 7 April 2026

Dry promotions, benefits-maxxing and Lobster learning: the viral job trends to know about to boost your career and pay

A new wave of viral workplace trends is changing how people think about career growth, pay rises and job security. Popularised on social media and increasingly discussed by career experts, these concepts highlight both the hidden pitfalls of modern work and the strategies employees can use to stay ahead.

At the centre of the conversation is the idea that not all career progression is what it seems.

One of the most widely discussed trends is the so-called “dry promotion.” This occurs when an employee is given a more senior title or additional responsibilities, but without any increase in pay. While it may appear to be a step forward, it can often mean doing significantly more work for the same salary. Experts warn that workers should treat such offers with caution and push for clear timelines or guarantees around future pay increases.

Closely related is “ghost growth,” where a role gradually expands over time without any formal recognition. Employees may find themselves taking on extra duties, managing more tasks, or filling gaps in a team, all without a change in job title or compensation. Because this shift happens slowly, it can be difficult to spot, making it important for workers to regularly review and document their responsibilities.

However, not all trends highlight problems. Some focus on making the most of what you already have. “Benefits-maxxing” encourages employees to fully utilise workplace perks beyond their base salary. From healthcare plans and gym memberships to training budgets and discount schemes, these benefits can add significant value, sometimes worth thousands each year, yet often go underused.

In a more uncertain economic climate, many workers are also turning to “career cushioning.” This strategy involves quietly preparing for potential job loss or change by updating CVs, expanding professional networks, and keeping an eye on new opportunities. Rather than reacting to instability, employees aim to stay one step ahead.

Another increasingly popular approach is “lily padding,” where individuals move between jobs strategically to accelerate their career progression. Instead of waiting years for an internal promotion, workers switch roles to secure higher salaries or better positions. When done thoughtfully, this method can fast-track both earnings and experience.

Finally, the concept of “lobster learning” reflects the need for continuous personal and professional growth. Inspired by the way lobsters shed their shells to grow, the idea encourages workers to keep developing new skills and adapting to change. In a fast-moving job market, standing still can quickly lead to falling behind.

Together, these trends paint a picture of a workforce that is becoming more aware, more strategic, and more willing to challenge traditional career paths. While some highlight ongoing issues, such as unpaid increases in workload, others offer practical ways for employees to take control of their progression.

The underlying message is clear: in today’s workplace, success is no longer just about working hard, but about working smart, understanding your value, recognising hidden patterns, and making deliberate moves to build a stronger, better-paid career.

The Sun, Lynsey Hope

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 April 2026

The Gen Z job crisis is real: 1.2 million recent grads in the U.K. competed for just 17,000 open roles

Gen Z is often derided as a lazy, unambitious generation of workers uninterested in climbing the corporate ladder. But contrary to popular belief, they’re just as determined as millennials or Gen Xers to get their careers off the ground, despite the odds seemingly stacked against them. From AI agents taking over entry-level roles to employers padding their reputations with “ghost” jobs, the labor market has become the Wild West. Even educators are waving the red flag. 

“There are many graduates now that are coming out of universities, which means that there are more people that are graduating necessarily for the jobs that are there,” Rob Breare, CEO of independent U.K. school system Malvern College International, recently said onstage at the Fortune Global Forum conference. 

“I saw a rather shocking statistic in the U.K. earlier this week,” Breare continued, referencing an Institute of Student Employers (ISE) statistic that 1.2 million applications were submitted for just 17,000 U.K. graduate roles in 2023/2024. The depressing figure, he said, “starts to give you the idea of just how competitive that market has become.”

Comparatively, 559,959 applicants were interviewed for graduate roles in 2021/2022, with U.K. employers hiring 19,646 of them. The slightly older cohort of Gen Zers enjoyed thousands more open roles and half the competition that their peers face today. 

Last year marked the highest number of applications per job ever recorded since the ISE started tracking the data in 1991. And it perfectly encapsulates the dreary state of job hunting: thousands of applicants submitted for a single role, candidates spending years trawling employment sites, and fresh-faced graduates shut out of entry-level gigs. And the U.S. is feeling it, too.

Colleges have an AI problem, and graduates are taking the heat

Job prospects are so bleak that Gen Z is going straight from tossing their graduation caps to years of doom with zero luck. As of this July, 58% of students who wrapped up college in the past year were still trying to find stable work, compared to 25% of millennials and Gen Xers who faced the same predicament. And a fifth of job seekers on the hunt have been looking for a year. 

Gen Z’s chances at landing work in the U.S.’s most promising, high-growth cities and industries don’t look any better. One of America’s largest and bustling employment hubs, New York City, added fewer than 1,000 private sector jobs in the first half of this year. Before the pandemic, the Big Apple was adding roughly 100,000 roles annually. The U.S.’s highly lucrative tech sector, encompassing trillion-dollar behemoths like Meta and Nvidia, is pushing Gen Z to the side, too. The proportion of workers aged 21 to 25 has halved at public tech companies since 2023, dropping from 15% to 6.8% by August of this year. 

Struggling with a lack of career opportunities, Gen Z is second-guessing the worth of pricey college degrees, which once promised them six-figure jobs. CEOs and experts have criticized universities for failing to keep up with the times; now that AI is here to stay, students had better be prepared to leverage it in their roles. Most colleges have struggled to keep up with the whiplash pace of AI innovation, but the CEO of Malvern College said schools are finally waking up. 

“With AI, many of those graduate jobs are changing or are more difficult for people to get into,” Breare continued. “So what we’re starting to see with that is that they are looking to their universities and to their educational program to really give them that fast start to thrive as they come out and go into life.”

Fortune, Emma Burleigh

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 April 2026

Full list of 8 major rule changes for UK workers as raft of new rights kicks in

UK Workers Gain New Rights as Major Rule Changes Take Effect

Millions of workers across the UK are set to benefit from a sweeping set of employment law reforms that came into force on April 6, 2026, marking one of the most significant overhauls of workplace protections in recent years.

The changes, introduced under the Employment Rights Act 2025, aim to expand access to basic protections, strengthen enforcement, and modernise workplace policies to reflect today’s labour market.

Sick Pay Overhaul Expands Coverage

One of the most impactful reforms is the overhaul of Statutory Sick Pay (SSP). Workers are now entitled to receive sick pay from the very first day of illness, eliminating the previous three-day waiting period that often left employees without income at the start of a sickness absence.

In addition, the removal of the lower earnings limit means that low-paid and part-time workers, many of whom were previously excluded, are now eligible. The change is expected to bring millions more workers into the safety net and reduce financial strain during short-term illness.

Paternity Leave Available From Day One

New fathers and partners will also benefit from improved family leave rights. Previously, employees needed to complete a qualifying period, typically 26 weeks of continuous service, before being eligible for paternity leave.

Under the new rules, that requirement has been scrapped, allowing workers to take paternity leave from their very first day in a job. The move is designed to give families greater flexibility and ensure that new parents can spend time together without delay.

Support for Bereaved Families Strengthened

In a significant and compassionate extension of family rights, new provisions now allow partners to take extended leave if the child’s mother or primary adopter dies within the first year after birth or adoption.

This measure enables affected partners to take up to 52 weeks of leave, providing crucial time to grieve, adjust, and care for their child during an extremely difficult period.

Tougher Rules on Redundancy Consultations

Workers facing redundancy are also better protected under the updated framework. Employers who fail to properly consult staff during large-scale redundancies now face increased financial penalties.

The enhanced “protective award” is intended to ensure that businesses follow fair procedures and give employees a meaningful opportunity to respond to redundancy proposals.

Whistleblowers Given Greater Protection

The reforms also strengthen protections for whistleblowers, workers who report wrongdoing in the workplace. This includes issues such as harassment, unsafe working conditions, or financial misconduct.

With stronger safeguards against dismissal or retaliation, the government hopes to encourage more employees to come forward without fear, helping to improve accountability across industries.

New Fair Work Agency to Enforce Rights

A key structural change is the creation of a new Fair Work Agency, which will act as a central body responsible for enforcing a wide range of employment rights.

The agency will oversee compliance with rules on sick pay, holiday pay, and minimum wage, and is expected to play a crucial role in both enforcement and education, helping employers and workers better understand their rights and responsibilities.

Employers Face Stricter Record-Keeping Duties

Businesses are now required to maintain detailed records demonstrating compliance with holiday pay regulations. These records must be retained for at least six years.

The move is aimed at increasing transparency and making it easier to resolve disputes, ensuring workers receive the pay they are entitled to.

Large Firms Pressured to Address Pay Gaps

Finally, larger employers, those with 250 or more staff, are being pushed to take greater accountability for workplace equality. They are expected to publish action plans outlining how they intend to address issues such as gender pay gaps and broader inclusion efforts.

While not all aspects are strictly enforced through penalties, the expectation is that increased transparency will drive cultural and organisational change.

The Sun

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 April 2026

Email to employee goes viral: HR tracks minutes, Internet tracks the drama

A workplace incident involving a UK-based entrepreneur, Tom Hunt, has captured widespread attention online after he shared an amusing yet baffling corporate email. The post, which quickly spread across the internet, highlighted how a minor time discrepancy turned into a full-blown discussion on workplace culture.

Hunt uploaded a screenshot of a message sent by a company’s HR representative to an employee. The email pointed out that the employee had logged off slightly before the official closing time. The difference was barely noticeable, just a few minutes, but it was enough to trigger a formal reminder. The HR personnel insisted that the employee compensate for this shortfall either by cutting down on lunch breaks or ensuring they stayed online until the exact closing time moving forward.

From LinkedIn to Viral Fame

The post gained significant traction on LinkedIn, attracting over a thousand reactions in a short time. However, its popularity didn’t stop there. It soon made its way to the widely followed Reddit community LinkedIn Lunatics, where it exploded in visibility, amassing tens of thousands of upvotes and sparking a wave of humorous commentary.

Internet Users Roast the Situation

Social media users wasted no time turning the situation into comedy gold. Many commenters mocked the rigid enforcement of such a trivial rule, imagining exaggerated scenarios where employees would strictly adhere to the clock without any flexibility. One user joked that the employee would now disconnect exactly at the designated time, regardless of any emergencies that might arise moments later.

Another participant humorously suggested reversing the logic by deliberately working extra minutes every day, only to later “claim back” the accumulated time by leaving early in bulk. The idea of keeping a running tally of minutes became a running gag among commenters.

A Reflection of Workplace Frustrations

Beyond the humor, some users expressed genuine frustration, stating that such rigid oversight would be enough to push them toward resigning. The incident struck a chord with many who felt that focusing on minute-by-minute monitoring undermines employee morale and overlooks actual productivity.

The Economic Times, ET Bureau

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 December 2025

Will we have any workplace leaders left by 2030?

Our latest Work Remastered research suggests that leadership is losing its allure.

Only a quarter of workers (23%) say they are motivated by the promise of promotion into a senior role, and only 20% said they wanted to become a leader in the future.

You might assume this is a ‘Gen Z problem’; that younger workers don’t want responsibility. But the data tells a different story. In fact, The cohort most likely to aspire to leadership is 18 to 24-year-olds. At 40%, their number is double the average across all age groups. 

Let’s shift the thinking, because the issue lies less in motivation and more in perceptions.

Many are reluctant to step up because they see it as a burden. They see leaders under constant scrutiny, battling internal politics, highly stressed and on the verge of burnout. It’s no surprise that so few would want to be a part of that.

This presents a real challenge: organisations must make leadership appealing again, or risk having no one left to lead.

Changing the narrative

Traditionally, leadership roles were associated with hierarchy, power and control, but that’s not what defines good leadership today. According to Work Remastered, the traits people look for in today’s leaders are trust, consistency and integrity (46%), as well as active listening and valuing diverse perspectives (38%). 

If these behaviours are visible and grounded in the company’s values, leaders can create a culture of respect and trust, making the step up more appealing to the next generation of junior and mid-level employees.

Wellbeing and workload balance (27%) also rank highly among employees’ top priorities. Redefining leadership, then, is a balancing act. Organisations need to demonstrate that leaders can have influence without work taking over their entire lives, and authority without losing their humanity.

The problem is that this isn’t the reality in many workplaces.

Practicing leadership

Aside from pay (38%) and their colleagues (28%), the opportunity for growth (27%) has the greatest influence on how people feel about work. This presents a genuine opportunity: if organisations can connect leadership to growth, showing it as a path for development, they can start to shift perceptions. 

Career progression should feel embedded in the culture. Growth should feel part of the everyday employee experience.

Many organisations have well-established leadership programmes that get people on that track. But, really, leadership development should be embedded into everyday work. Organisations need to identify early those that have the traits of a great leader and grow them into the role.

By giving employees ‘try before you buy’ experiences, organisations can build leadership development into day-to-day tasks. Leading a small team on a specific project lets people test leadership skills in a low-risk environment and decide if it’s the right path for them. Leadership should be a journey, not a leap.

Even if it isn’t their preferred route, it still offers meaningful growth. One of the biggest myths in business is that there’s only one path forward. Organisations have to accept that not everyone wants to be a leader. And that’s okay.

Equally important are visibility and accessibility. People can’t aspire to what they can’t see.

Too often, those in the C-suite feel far removed from their junior colleagues. This is where mentoring programmes come in. By connecting the C-suite directly with junior and mid-level employees, they break down barriers and show what good leadership looks like in practice. 

The leadership pipeline won’t rebuild itself. Succession planning and the next tier of up-and-coming leaders is often missing, or not as planned into organisational development as it should be. Organisations need to act now, making leadership visible, meaningful and human, or risk running out of people willing to lead.

HR Magazine, Mavis Boniface

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 December 2025

Unemployment hits post-pandemic peak

Unemployment in the UK rose to 5% in the three months to the end of September, according to new figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) released yesterday (11 November).

The increase, up from 4.8% in the previous quarter, brings the number of unemployed people to 1.8 million, the highest level since January 2021, during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. City economists had forecast a smaller rise to 4.9%.

The ONS reported that the early estimate of payrolled employees for October 2025 fell by 180,000 (0.6%) compared with the previous year, and by 32,000 (0.1%) month-on-month, bringing the total number of payrolled employees to 30.3 million.

“Employers are hesitant to hire in the current climate, yet face additional pressure to retain their top talent to future-proof their organisation,” Jonathan Firth, VP of recruitment solutions at consultancy LHH, told HR magazine.

Firth explained that without the ability to onboard external talent to fuel business growth and address skills gaps, upskilling existing talent is now a strategic imperative.  

Separate research findings from business services giant PwC, published today (12 November), highlighted that Gen Z professionals (62%) are nearly twice as likely as Gen X workers (35%) to feel optimistic about the future of their roles.

The survey also revealed generational differences in attitudes towards technology. Around half (51%) of Gen Z respondents said they believe they can control how technology affects their work, compared with just 21% of Gen X workers.

Firth added: “Upskilling and career development should not be one-size-fits-all all. Learning and development programmes must embrace the differences in a multigenerational workforce and put humans at the centre to foster collaboration and improve retention.”

Speaking to HR magazine, Jeanette Wheeler, CPO at HR, payroll and finance provider MHR, said: “HR has a critical role to play in redefining the workplace of the future, and while there has been a lot of conversation about whether entry-level roles are drying up, PwC’s latest research suggests we’re not witnessing the elimination of opportunities.” 

For Wheeler, PwC’s research suggests that AI is exposing the vacuum left by organisations that fail to proactively redesign jobs around the skills most needed in the next decade.

“In a hiring-shy market, your best hire is the person already on your payroll,” Kate Underwood, managing director of her own consultancy, Kate Underwood HR and Training, told HR magazine.  

“HR isn’t the hire-and-fire department, it’s the growth engine,” she added. To support organisational growth, Underwood advised employers to use regular appraisals to ask three things: what does the business needs? What does the person want to learn? And what support will make it happen? 

She suggested that if big pay rises are not possible, employers can add value by offering mentoring, apprenticeships, shadowing, stretch projects and bite-sized learning. 

For Sara Roberts, chief services officer at training provider Kingdom Academy, HR professionals navigating hiring freezes should recognise that older workers have experience and institutional knowledge that is crucial to futureproofing industries.

Speaking to HR magazine, Roberts said: “Employers must focus on long-term growth and progression, not just for individual employees but for the business itself and the sector as a whole.” 

She suggested that personalised, inclusive training courses are key to encouraging more older workers to upskill.

Wheeler advised: “The best way for leaders to ensure that all generations are provided with the skills they need to keep themselves and the business performing in the right way, centres around an effective change management strategy and encouraging a culture of shared knowledge.” 

She explained that creating a collaborative culture requires everyone to understand the organisation’s shared objective and their role in working towards that vision. 

“HR’s role must be rooted in advocating for the company to build a flexible, skills-first talent pipeline, or it risks stagnation, weaker innovation and a widening skills gap,” said Wheeler. 

Roberts highlighted that everyone has their own preferred way of engaging with learning, so it’s important to cater to everyone. “Some learners may need extra guidance to navigate online learning platforms, so providing tech support from the outset is crucial,” she said.

Underwood added: “Support older workers with new tools and confidence, and use reverse mentoring so that skills flow both ways.”

PwC surveyed 2,023 UK employees across 28 sectors between 7 July and 18 August 2025 for its Global Workforce Hopes & Fears Survey 2025.

HR Magazine, Emily-Rose Payne

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 December 2025

Young expats reveal their reasons for fleeing Starmer’s Britain

Why we’ve left the UK…and won’t be coming back: Spiralling living costs, a nation divided, and because ‘everything is always broken’



Young expats today revealed their reasons for leaving the UK as the exodus gathers pace under Labour. 

Last year the number of UK citizens going to live abroad was 257,000, far more than the 77,000 previously estimated by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Before Sir Keir Starmer came to power, the highest such figure was 283,000 in 2021, when international travel reopened following the pandemic.

Young professionals who spoke to the Daily Mail named the high cost of living, rising taxes and a sense that ‘everything is always broken’ for their decision to pack up and go.

Others described growing political division and having to work long hours for little money. None planned to return.

Emma Hardie is a self-employed content creator who left Glasgow two months ago and now lives with her husband in Kuala Lumpur, the capital city of Malaysia. 

The 33-year-old left the UK for a range of reasons, including the rising cost of living to what she sees as a growing culture of individualism.  

‘The cost of living was a big issue, it felt like you were getting squeezed at all angles and every week you were paying more, without getting more in return,’ she said. 

‘It’s stressful to even go out in the UK now with the price of parking, train tickets, entry fees and everything else. 

‘Over here you get a great standard of living for a fraction of the cost, electricity is seven times less, for example.’

There were also cultural factors behind her decision to leave Britain behind.  

‘We had fallen into the trap of that work, grind culture, with everything else in life getting put on the backburner,’ she said.  

‘There’s too much of an imbalance in the UK, it feels like the only thing that matters is work. 

‘There’s also a lot of division and you feel like you’re being constantly bombarded. You don’t realise how much stress that causes until you step away.

‘I love the nineties and it feels like I’m living in the nineties here in Malaysia. Here it’s quite similar to the old UK.’ 

Net emigration has peaked since last year’s general election.

In the 12 months to September 2024, a net 116,000 Britons left the country. This is far higher than previously thought.

By December, the net figure for the previous 12 months was 114,000. Net British emigration was just 81,000 in 2022.

In the last decade, more than 30,000 Brits have said goodbye to the UK to start new lives in Poland.

Alexandra Mocroft moved from Faversham in Kent to the historic city of Kraków about a year ago, renting a studio flat for just £400 a month.

The 34-year-old is learning Polish at university while tutoring and babysitting to support herself.

Ms Mocroft said she feels safe and has never experienced aggression on the street, even when walking home at night.

She said: ‘It’s safe and quiet. I feel comfortable walking around.’

She loves the city’s trams, which are punctual, cheap and reliable, a daily travelcard costs £3.55 while a weekly one costs less than £12.

And in contrast to the downcast mood in the UK, Ms Mocroft has found the atmosphere in Poland to be more positive and uplifting. 

‘You saw what war and communism did to places like Kraków, and then you saw how people turned it around,’ he said. 

‘That spirit of reconstruction was exactly what I needed in my life.’

The expat already has a circle of Polish and international friends, and enjoys cold water dips in local wild bathing spots and skiing in the nearby mountains.

Shadow home secretary Chris Philp blamed Labour’s ‘punishing tax rises’ for Brits fleeing in record numbers. 

‘The brightest and the best are leaving the UK for places like Dubai and Milan, leaving the rest of us to pay Labour’s higher taxes,’ he said. 

‘This is evidence that increasing tax too far makes people leave.’ 

Ricardo, who works in software development, has relocated from Berkshire to Bratislava in Slovakia.

The 32-year-old described having to pay high taxes for little return as one of his reasons for upping sticks, although his departure preceded the last election. 

‘Everything in the UK was very expensive and you don’t always know where your taxes are going,’ he said. 

‘You see a lot of issues, like potholes on roads, and things not working as expected. 

‘For me, I mainly miss family and friends. I also miss the humour, but otherwise I prefer it here.’ 

Ricardo had also grown downcast about developments in British society. 

‘I felt the UK was growing more divided, something that seems to have got worse and worse since I left,’ he said. 

‘I also find my work life balance much better in Bratislava, there’s more freedom to work remotely, which lets me travel around Europe for long weekends. 

‘Public transport and flights are much cheaper here too.’

Joe Brady was living in Portsmouth before moving to Bangkok, where he now runs his own AI agency. 

The 27-year-old insisted the Thai capital was a better place to run a business than modern Britain and has no plans to return three years on. 

‘My overheads are so much lower so I have more money to invest back into my business than if I had to pay for higher rent and other costs,’ he said. 

‘If you’re a young person I’d say it’s worth giving it a try. My life is less stressful and I have more money in my back pocket.’

Daily Mail

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 December 2025

UK firms plan 3% pay rises in coming year, see AI hit to jobs, survey shows

LONDON, Nov 10 (Reuters), British employers expect to raise wages by 3% in the next 12 months, but some recruiters expect artificial intelligence to shrink their workforce, according to a survey that showed firms were worried about the impact of government tax plans on hiring.

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, a professional body for the human resources sector, said overall hiring intentions were around the weakest since the pandemic, and were especially low in the public sector.

One in six employers expect the use of AI tools will allow them to reduce their headcount in the next 12 months.

Of those, a quarter expect the staffing reduction to be greater than 10%, with junior managerial, clerical, professional and administrator roles expected to be the most affected.

The CIPD said finance minister Rachel Reeves should avoid further measures that will dampen hiring in her November 26 budget, after she announced a big rise in employers’ social security contributions last year.

James Cockett, senior labour market economist at the CIPD, said people looking for jobs were already feeling the impact of slower hiring since Reeves’ first budget.

“We need to see a stronger focus by the government and employers on longer-term workforce planning and investment in skills to help people use AI effectively in their roles or transition into different jobs or occupations as AI use grows,” Cockett said.

The CIPD said that across the more than 2,000 businesses it surveyed, the median expected increase in staff basic pay was 3%, where it had been for six consecutive quarters.

A Bank of England survey of employers released on Thursday showed expectations for wage growth ticked higher to 3.7% in the three months to October, the highest reading for five months.

Official labour market figures are expected to show a small slowdown in wage growth on Tuesday. Economists polled by Reuters forecast regular pay in the three months to September to have increased by an annual 4.6%, slightly below the 4.7% rise in the month before.

British wage growth tends to be faster than growth in pay settlements, as the latter does not include gains made by workers who move to better-paid jobs.

Although the BoE held interest rates at 4% last week and signalled it could be on course to cut rates at its next meeting in December, it is still closely monitoring pay growth which could push up inflation.

The CIPD survey took place between September 19 and October 14.

Reporting by Suban Abdulla; editing by David Milliken

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2025

Is the AI bubble about to burst?

While the HR hype around AI shows no sign of slowing, the volume of its critics is increasing. Dan Cave explores what HR really needs to know, and be mindful of, about AI.

Hype around artificial intelligence (AI) has exploded over the last couple of years. The World Economic Forum believes that AI will change around half the jobs in developed nations.

Many companies use AI internally and in products. Its popularity led to a chip-making company behind much of AI development briefly becoming the world’s most valuable company earlier this year.

This isn’t to say that AI’s rise has been inexorable. In recent months, many AI-powered firms have had billions wiped off their value.

According to an MIT university professor, AI will eventually only change 5% of work, and boost productivity by just 0.5%. Goldman Sachs researchers say that the tech will make existing features more glitzy than useful. Where do such doubts leave HR?

AI and HR

Many of the biggest businesses are already using AI software across the talent lifecycle. Hilton uses it for recruitment, PepsiCo for engagement and lifecycle management, and Shell uses it for learning and development.

Many in HR will recognise a version of AI being integrated into recruitment for years, initially to mitigate against unconscious bias and to streamline hiring. This integration expanded into multiple areas such as performance management, learning and development, career development and workflow optimisation.

Already, the HR tech marketplace is awash with AI offerings that promise to save time and help HR deliver strategically. What’s not to like?

Truthfully, in many areas of HR it’s hard to see the AI hype fading. While the financial services company Klarna is looking at phasing out human employees to be replaced with AI, Tim Sharp, global head of talent at the pharmaceuticals company Takeda, explains that AI is used across the entirety of HR’s remit: from skills development to communicating meeting outcomes to employees.

“We’ve got it everywhere,” he says. “It’s really useful. It can maximise both outputs and operating models.”

HR’s belief in AI

Sharp isn’t the only one who sees AI as positive and practical. More than six in 10 HR leaders want to use AI more, research by insights firm Gartner found, and many see AI as nothing but a boon.

While the world at large might be starting to doubt AI, Gartner found that 81% of HR leaders use AI to, as they perceive it, boost efficiency. More than nine in 10 report believing that AI saves costs.

Neil Sahota, CEO of the machine learning software firm ASCIILabs, cites multiple places where AI is being used for good in HR: Unilever leverages AI tools in video interviews, aiming for more objective, unbiased assessments; Hilton uses AI chatbots to save practitioners time, and the multinational firm General Electric uses AI for continuous performance assessments. “AI is transforming the way organisations manage their workforce, offering innovative solutions that enhance efficiency, accuracy and decision-making across various HR functions,” Sahota says.

Elsewhere, Jon Lester, VP of HR tech and AI for outsourcing firm IBM HR, says that AI has allowed HR to dump repetitive tasks. “HR professionals are using the extra time to learn new skills,” he explains.

Shmulik Barel, VP of the software firm Workhuman, sees AI as giving HR the competitive edge in areas that have been traditionally hard to capture and measure, such as employee sentiment. He says: “AI helps HR make evidence-based decisions to support strategic goals.”

For those who might be tempted to buy into catastrophic assessments of where AI might take the world of work, or who are frustrated that it hasn’t delivered yet, global industry analyst Josh Bersin advises looking at the examples of where AI has already helped, such as data analysis and equality, diversity and inclusion efforts: “We have so many challenges in HR that are essentially data-driven problems, and we don’t have the time to parse it. AI can do this, and help us make better decisions along the way.”

AI worries

But AI doesn’t come without risk. Bersin admits that AI’s utility can be oversold, and that it is well known that generative AI can hallucinate (produce false, misleading or fabricated information). Vendors can get lost in the data rather than the solution HR practitioners need, he says, and, as it stands, many AI products focus on broad utility rather than acute HR problems: “The information that comes from this type of AI is likely to be B-minus level,” according to Bersin.

Sahota also sees limits to AI, adding that while AI is used to mitigate bias, it can also exaggerate bias, creating ethical, and operational challenges. “AI can perpetuate implicit bias if not carefully managed,” he says.

“We’ve seen examples of it penalising candidates from women’s colleges, which shows the importance of transparency and diversity in AI training data.” He adds that AI needs human oversight to maintain trust and humanity alongside its use.

Similarly, IBM’s Lester believes that AI is still lacking in some key areas. Specifically, he says, it is not up to speed in aspects of organisational life that are highly regulated, adding: “AI has limitations, particularly in areas requiring human empathy and nuanced decision-making.”

As professor and AI ethicist Roger Steare explains it, organisations implementing AI need to ask what it’s actually delivering, and if it’s benefiting humans. This is especially critical when metrics such as employees’ psychological safety, happiness and engagement are central to HR’s perceived performance.

Steare says: “Many people think AI is conscious or has a conscience. It doesn’t. As with much technology we introduce into work, we have to ask more: is it delivering productive value, or helping people lead happier lives?”

Getting past AI problems

Such questions, about how to manage AI effectively so that it benefits both the business and its people, will likely land with HR. So, Bersin says, HR professionals should look for vendors that can show workplace value, and that have a targeted solution.

For Lester, it’s about ignoring vendors that promise the world and instead looking at those that see AI as one tool among many. “AI should be seen as a powerful tool in our toolbox that augments HR processes rather than replaces human expertise,” he says.

Indeed, it’s the increasing tailoring of AI that Sahota says will lead to a more mature use. “Chasing after the next big AI breakthrough, many HR professionals are focusing on incremental improvements that can deliver tangible benefits.”

What does this mean for managing the technology? For Eser Rizaoglu, Gartner’s senior analyst, it’s about having a product owner, as with other parts of the tech stack. He says: “The key recommendation for HR leaders is to introduce an AI product owner role into the HR function who can not only coordinate HR’s approach to AI but also work with the broader organisation to ensure that AI has a positive impact on the whole workforce.”

Lester adds that it’s about getting the business case right, getting the right AI skills into HR (such as prompt proficiency), being mindful of drawbacks, and building out policy and ethical oversight, as well as being transparent about the data that AI uses. “For HR, the rule of ‘humans in the loop’ is key to ensuring that AI does not make decisions about people, and people make decisions about people,” he says.

As more HR leaders build AI into their processes, the rapid pace of transformation means oversight is needed, according to Andreea Wade, VP of AI at software firm iCIMS. “It needs robust governance,” she says, meaning ethical guidelines and policies that ensure AI is human-led, technically robust, private, secure, transparent and accountable.

As Stear recommends, some scepticism is probably warranted. “Scepticism is a healthy process: it’s not about being a Luddite but about weighing up the pros and cons of AI for your workplace,” he adds.

Where next?

As Bersin sees it, people will veer away from utopian promises as the AI market matures. The mindset of HR leaders will shift from a focus on how AI is changing the business HR is in, and move towards how AI is improving what the business already does.

HR is only at the beginning of its AI journey, Bersin explains. If vendors and buyers make the right choices, then AI might be applied to problems that need fixing. He adds: “Of course, this means taking the usual approach to implementing anything new: having an ROI measure, and ensuring people do need it.”

For now, according to Steare, HR should take a balanced view: questioning whether vendor promises are truly all that, while understanding where AI might have potential. “There are areas where AI is being used well, in conjunction with human failsafes. We can point to areas where it does lots of good.

“But there are dangers. We have to ask vendors to show the technology’s processes. We have to care about the value, the ethics, safety and morality,” which is never a bad thing for HR to do, anyway.

HR’s AI doubts

While many HR professionals want to use AI more, others are more sceptical about its use. Tina Rahman, founder of the consultancy HR Habitat, doesn’t want to use it when it comes to employment law and HR, cutting off contacts who kept trying to push it on her. “I was always against AI when it comes to employment law,” she says.

Laura Evans, CEO of the consultancy Glass Ceilings Change Management, believes that AI should be treated with more caution, especially with regard to intellectual property and personal information. “We will not use any external AI tools to transcribe meetings, and we ask others to switch theirs off before starting a conversation,” she explains.

The CIPD’s director of profession, David D’Souza, reminds us that HR’s needs may be different to vendors’. He says: “HR professionals should take great care when selecting a technology vendor, to ensure that the choice matches their needs and risk appetite.”

AI and HR chatbots

AI-powered chatbots are increasingly popular for businesses. They promise to streamline processes, personalise tasks and create recommendations. Many integrate into other tech stack elements, and can be managed using voice commands.

“Our solution has been particularly popular in companies with complex HR needs and global workforces,” says Michelle Dawkins, senior director of solution consulting for the AI-powered HR tech provider Workday. “It enables HR professionals to dedicate more time to strategic initiatives.”

Gartner research has found that employee-facing chatbots are among the top three uses of generative AI in the HR function. Such bots are now akin to digital assistants that automate tasks and answer FAQs.

HR Magazine, Dan Cave

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2025

Overcome the challenges of executive hiring

Executive-level hiring is fraught with challenges. While successfully identifying the best experienced talent is tricky enough, moving through an onboarding process for senior executives can be quite another task.

However, the right hire can inspire teams, elevate a department and even transform a business. 

Further compounding the senior hiring problem, there have been many recent examples, such as a former chief constable of Northamptonshire who was found guilty of gross misconduct for making false claims about his military record, to demonstrate that no organisation is immune from exaggerated or fabricated claims, from even the highest executives in the land.

So, while many businesses agree that conducting comprehensive background screening should be an essential part of hiring and onboarding, an overly complicated or time-consuming screening process could load additional and unnecessary pressure on all parties, which is not what you want in today’s hyper-competitive executive job market. 

The senior-level hiring process must strike a careful balance of proportionate due diligence while providing an efficient and transparent experience for both candidates and hiring professionals. 

Executive screening considerations 

Senior hires can present particular challenges when it comes to background screening. Unlike recruiting for more junior roles, C-suite and executive-level candidates often have unique circumstances that should be considered to provide a positive screening experience: 

  • More extensive checking: Senior roles often require deeper and more comprehensive background checks, such as directorship searches, financial probity checks and international verifications. Additionally, executives may have longer and more geographically distributed employment histories that need verification, which can add complexity. 
  • Postponed employer contact: Senior hires will likely have extended notice periods with their current employer. Candidates can be asked to confirm, during the application process, a future date from which their employer may be contacted, preventing premature referencing activity when it is most sensitive. 
  • Unfamiliarity with screening: Some executive candidates, particularly those from non-regulated industries, may never have experienced a formal background check before. They may have worked for one company for a long time, perhaps even before they adopted a background screening policy. Providing clear guidance upfront can help set expectations and reduce uncertainty about the background screening process. 

Transparency and communication 

Given these complexities, transparency is essential to maintain trust in the process. Hiring managers, external recruiters and talent acquisition professionals should clearly communicate the scope and requirements of the background screening process early on, ensuring that candidates understand what will be required from them. This helps to minimise surprises or frustration, reduce delays caused by incomplete or missing information, and foster confidence in the hiring organisation.

A seamless, candidate-centric experience  

While conducting thorough due diligence is important, it is also essential to provide a clear and straightforward process that helps candidates complete background checks smoothly and with minimal confusion. 

Industry-specific compliance expertise 

Highly regulated industries, including financial services, technology, healthcare and legal sectors, often have specific background screening requirements that need to be adhered to. For example, many senior hires in financial services must undergo specialised checks to meet regulatory requirements, especially those falling within the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Senior Manager and Certification Regime (SMCR).  

Speed shouldn’t compromise accuracy 

Executives often expect a swift hiring process. Delays can lead to frustration or lost opportunities. Providing timely updates throughout the background screening process can help keep both employers and candidates informed, and reduce uncertainty. 

HR Magazine, Matthew Berry is an account director for background screening provider HireRight 

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2025

Sheffield United reappoints club manager: How to rehire talent

Chris Wilder has been reappointed as manager of Sheffield United after Rubén Sellés was dismissed, the club announced on Monday (15 September).

Wilder was previously sacked after the club’s loss at the Championship playoff finals, meaning that Sheffield United failed to be promoted to the Premier League. 

This is the third time that Wilder has managed the Blades. His current contract that runs until summer 2027.

In a press conference yesterday (16 September), Wilder said: “This is a special and unique club for me… I enjoyed my conversations with the owners when there was the possibility of coming back and collaborating with them.”

The club’s board of directors stated: “Chris Wilder returns with proven leadership and an unparalleled understanding of Sheffield United. We are confident he is the right person to restore momentum, unite the squad and supporters, and deliver the results necessary to achieve our objectives this season.”

Zoe Wilson, founder and director of the consultancy ReThink HR, told HR magazine that the potential for rehiring individuals should prompt HR leaders to think about their offboarding processes. She pointed out that not many companies have an offboarding strategy, as technology is used to automate task management and offboarding processes.

She continued: “[The time saved by automation] should leave room for HR professionals to work with the business on how they want to shape the employee experience when being offboarded from the business.”

Even if employers don’t see a scenario where the employee may return, leaving staff have a voice and impact, through their connections on social media, and with family and friends, Wilson explained.

Aaron Taylor, head of the HR department at Arden University, added: “A successful offboarding process hinges on clear communication and a structured approach.” 

Speaking to HR magazine, Taylor explained that it is essential to ensure the departing employee understands the steps involved, from their final working day to any post-employment obligations or benefits.

“It’s important to try and understand why the employee is leaving, how they felt about management and leadership, the work environment and culture, their career development and compensation, as well as whether they would consider returning to the company in the future,” he added.

In Chris Wilder’s case, his connection to Sheffield United and his willingness to support the club highlight the importance of maintaining strong relationships, even after an employee has moved on, Taylor noted. 

Keeping former employees “warm” requires a proactive and respectful approach, Taylor explained. “Alumni networks, or LinkedIn, can be a powerful tool in this regard. By creating a platform for former employees to stay connected with the company and each other, businesses can foster a sense of community and goodwill.”

“People leave for all sorts of reasons. Having a talent pool of experienced individuals who know your business, that could return bringing additional knowledge and skills with them if they return, in my view, is worth investing in,” Wilson added.

Referencing her own experience, Wilson recalled times when she had been ignored by her “manager for the whole of my notice period”.

She added: “While I knew it was because they were disappointed that I was leaving, it was an awful and uncomfortable experience, and I definitely didn’t keep in touch.”  

This compared to Wilson’s positive experiences, where the company managed a three-month notice period well, and continued to trust her with clients even though she was going to a competitor business. “It’s been eight years of running my own business, and I’d still never say no to returning [to that company which managed the notice period well]. I’ll always speak of them, and my time there, fondly,” Wilson added. 

Taylor agreed, and said: “It’s important to treat departing employees with respect and appreciation, as this sets the tone for any future interactions. When employees leave on good terms, they are more likely to speak positively about your business and consider returning if the opportunity arises.”

Wilson concluded: “You want to ensure that your leavers are advocates. Make sure that they know the door is open for a conversation if ever they wanted to discuss returning.”

HR Magazine, Emily-Rose Payne

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2025

Survey finds 42% of workers feel overlooked

More than four in ten UK employees (42%) say they feel undervalued at work, according to research findings published by employee benefits platform Perkbox on Wednesday (17 September).

The survey revealed that undervalued employees experience a 57% drop in motivation, a 50% decline in morale, and a 47% fall in enthusiasm.

One in three (34%) workers are considering leaving their jobs next year, and more than half (54%) of undervalued employees are planning to seek new opportunities in 2026.

Sarah Pittman, director of client partnerships at risk management business NFP, suggested that one way of showing that employees are valued is to ensure that work is as welcoming and inclusive as possible. She told HR magazine, she said: “Employees value workplaces that are inclusive, and where they feel valued, respected, and heard.”

They also value a workplace “where they can build positive relationships with their colleagues,” Pittman continued, adding that this can be difficult in a remote or hybrid work environment.

Speaking to HR magazine, Andrew Safo-Poku Jnr, HR director for cleaning and security provider Samsic UK, said: “Making employees feel valued is the cornerstone of a people-centric business.

“A workplace needs to be somewhere people can have a voice, where they feel welcome, know they can express their views, be listened to without judgement, and allowed to communicate freely,” Safo-Poku explained.  

He suggested that employers create a framework for open dialogue, using surveys, workshops, conferences, meetings, work councils, and mental health first aiders.

Perkbox’s survey findings highlighted recognition as the top driver of employees feeling valued (it was cited by 53% of employees.) Yet 30% of workplaces currently offer recognition programmes, according to the survey findings.

Nearly eight in ten employees (79%) said they would feel more valued with a tailored benefits package, while two-thirds (68%) indicated that improved benefits would boost productivity. This rose to 84% among 25-to-34-year-olds.

Pippa Van Praagh, Perkbox’s vice president of operations, told HR magazine: “Employers are largely aware of the risks of undervaluation, from a looming retention crisis to a decline in productivity and employee wellbeing. But this awareness has yet to translate into meaningful, widespread change.”

Van Praagh added: “While a slight perception gap exists between employers’ optimism and the reality of employee value, the even more pressing issue is the action gap.”

To address this, she suggested “strategically deploying practical levers that employees have shown they desire,” such as fair pay, increased recognition, better work-life balance, or comprehensive benefits packages. 

Working for an organisation that fosters a hybrid or flexible working approach is key for employees in a post-Covid-19 work environment, Pittman said: “People really value flexibility, working for a business where they can manage their time in an adult environment.”

“Employees value working for an organisation that provides them opportunities to learn and grow, one that is moving with the times and helping them to develop future skills in things like AI,” Pittman said. 

Clear career paths and development plans that show how employees grow within the company can also help people feel valued and invested in, Pittman explained. 

When asked what would help employees feel more valued, survey respondents pointed to financial wellbeing support (35%), recognition and reward programmes (30%), and health and wellbeing initiatives (29%). Employers echoed these priorities, though many admitted that they lack the resources to deliver them.

Safo-Poku added: “Making people feel like they belong and have a role to play in a setting where they are cared for and nurtured can inspire loyalty and promote a sense of pride in their work and the company.”

Representatives of Perkbox commissioned OnePoll to survey 4,000 UK employees and 1,000 UK employers between 12 and 20 August 2025.

HR Magazine, Emily-Rose Payne

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 3 June 2025

Half of Employees Distrust Leadership’s Balance of Business and Wellbeing

Half (46%) of UK employees don’t trust leaders to balance business needs with employee wellbeing, according to research findings published today (15 May).

Three in five employees would also refuse a promotion in order to maintain their wellbeing, research from recruitment consultancy Michael Page’s Talent Trends 2025 report has highlighted. 

A quarter of employees reported being unhappy with the decisions made by their leaders. 

Leaders who recognise that business decisions and employee wellbeing complement each other will often see the greatest success, said Lucy Spencer, Michael Page’s people and culture director. 

She told HR magazine: “Mental wellbeing directly impacts productivity, creativity and retention: critical business metrics. Businesses can’t afford a ‘clarity chasm’. If employees feel their mental wellbeing is secondary, or if there’s ambiguity around policies like flexible working, trust is eroded and so is engagement.

“The strategy for business leaders should be to proactively demonstrate that employee wellbeing is a business priority. This means clear, consistent communication, tangible support systems, and a culture where discussing mental health is destigmatised.”

To ensure that employees know their wellbeing is a priority for the business, HR leaders should support a healthy work/life balance from the outset, added Paul Guess, case management officer for occupational health and wellbeing charity caba ( caba (the chartered accountants benevolent association). 

Speaking to HR magazine, Guess said: “HR leaders should take a proactive rather than reactive approach. They promote a healthy work/life balance from the outset, to ensure employees feel as though their wellbeing is being prioritised. 

“This can be as simple as encouraging simple physical activities throughout the workday, such as short walks or stretching sessions, and offering flexible working hours when appropriate. It’s also vital to regularly check in with employees, to understand whether they need time to recharge, or support in managing their workload.”

Research findings by Michael Page also revealed a disconnect between flexibility and return-to-office mandates. Some 43% of managers believed productivity improves in person, while 46% of employees reported being more productive at home. 

Employees cited fewer distractions (93%), better time management (72%), and more autonomy (69%) as reasons they thrive outside of the office.

Almost half (45%) of employees said that having a sense of purpose in their role was their top priority, up from 29% in 2024.

Business leaders should “talk less and prove more” when showing employees that their wellbeing matters, stated consultant Lucy Kemp.

She told HR magazine: “Employees are tired of hearing that wellbeing ‘matters’ when the lived experience tells them otherwise. If leadership is sending emails about mental health while piling on unrealistic deadlines and glorifying presenteeism, the message is clear: business comes first, people come second. Leaders need to model the behaviour, not just sign off on an employee assistance programme (EAP).

“Take lunch breaks. Switch off, out of hours. Reward rest as much as results. That’s how trust is built.

“Striking the balance means understanding that employee wellbeing and business performance are not opposites. They’re connected. Short-term hustle at the cost of long-term health will cost your business more than any missed deadline. The strategy is simple, even if the execution isn’t. Set clear expectations. Build in recovery time. Listen to feedback.”

HR Magazine, Lara Bryant

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 3 June 2025

Hiring Confidence at a Record Low, as Redundancies Rise

Employer hiring confidence is at a record low, and redundancies are on the rise, the CIPD’s research findings suggest.

Overall net employment balance (NEB), the difference between employers expecting an increase in staff levels and those expecting a decrease over the next three months, fell from +13 last quarter to +8 this quarter, according to the CIPD’s Labour Market Outlook report, published today (12 May). 

A quarter (24%) of employers plan to make redundancies in the next three months, the CIPD’s data suggests. A similar proportion (27%) of employers conducted a redundancy programme in the last year. 

Redundancies affect everyone, not just those who are made redundant, explained the CIPD’s director of profession, David D’Souza, so HR must support the entire organisation through the process. 

D’Souza told HR magazine: “It’s not about processing people; it’s about supporting people through a process. That means everyone: those directly affected, the managers supporting them and the people that will remain in the organisation. Training for line managers will be important to ensure that processes are followed and there is a consistent approach, but also so that they feel supported and confident.

“Employers should explore all alternatives and consult meaningfully with those affected, clearly explaining the reasons for redundancy, the steps taken to avoid it, and options for redeployment where possible. Sensitive handling makes a real difference.”

Managers should also feel supported by HR if needed when making redundancies, added Briony Richards, senior associate at law firm Charles Russell Speechlys.

Speaking to HR magazine, she advised HR leaders to “have conversations with managers upfront about the importance of meaningful consultation, and ensure they are provided with adequate information about how to conduct a consultation meeting (this could include providing scripts or ‘points-to-note’ documents). 

“Explain that, when speaking with at-risk employees, managers should not feel pressure to answer questions if they are unsure, it’s okay for them to say that they will take the question away and look into it. Encourage managers to speak with HR (or in-house counsel) whenever they are uncertain.”

Managers should also communicate with remaining staff, to ensure that they feel supported during redundancies, added D’Souza. 

He said: “Regular, honest, two-way communication throughout the redundancy process, from line managers to all staff, is vital to avoid misinformation and gaps in communications, which can happen given sensitivities involved.

“Managers should be prepared to deal fully with people’s feedback and concerns, and ensure that the information given out is clear and understood. They will also need to know where to access support for themselves or their teams.”

The retail and education sectors are facing the highest hiring pressures, according to the CIPD’s research. 

The NEB for the retail sector fell from +23 in autumn 2024 to, 19 this quarter. One in 10 retail employers expect there will be an increase in staff levels in the next three months.

In the education sector, the NEB fell from +4 last quarter to -13 among employers in compulsory education, which includes primary and secondary education, and from 0 last quarter to -7 among those in non-compulsory education, which includes vocational and higher education institutions. 

The public sector was described as having the most ‘hard-to-fill’ vacancies: 44% employers reported having them, compared to 33% of overall employers.

The CIPD commissioned the polling provider YouGov to survey 2,004 senior HR professionals and decision-makers in the UK. Fieldwork was undertaken between 24 March and 15 April 2025.

HR Magazine, Lara Bryant

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 3 June 2025

Is it ever worth revenge quitting your job?

You’ve been working from home for half of the week since the pandemic, but your boss has decided everyone needs to return to the office full-time.

There doesn’t seem to be a reason for the move, and in fact, you’ve been more productive and creative while working remotely. You feel frustrated, stressed, and are considering quitting.

As the remote work culture war rumbles on, more workers are expected to revenge quit. Put simply, revenge quitting is when workers resign as a way of showing their dissatisfaction with their workplace.

It is often driven by feelings of anger, resentment, and frustration usually after a particular event or conversation.

A recent survey of 1,007 full-time employees by Software Finder found 17% of full-time employees have “revenge quit” in the past. About 4% of full-time employees plan to quit in 2025, and nearly a third (28%) of employees expect revenge quitting to occur at their workplace this year.

“Revenge quitting is often used to describe a situation in which a frustrated or annoyed employee quits their role as a form of revenge against their employer,” says Eloise Skinner, a career expert, author and psychotherapist.

“The pros could include a feeling of satisfaction and fulfilment from leaving a workplace in which you had a negative experience. You may also experience a sense of agency and autonomy and a feeling of freedom.”

Revenge quitting also sends a clear message to your employer that their decisions or behaviour isn’t appreciated. “It can give you the ability to take actions that align with your identity, like standing up for your values,” says Skinner.

But if you work in an industry where news spreads quickly, revenge-quitting may come back to bite you.

“While revenge quitting might seem like a way to assert autonomy and express dissatisfaction, it often leads to more harm than good for both the employee and the employer,” says Lynn Burman, director of Clover HR.

“It can be problematic because it can disrupt an entire workplace and have a negative impact on team morale but, importantly for the individual, it can damage their professional reputation as employers are unlikely to provide a reference.

“Sudden revenge quitting may also be in breach of an employment contract, which could lead to disciplinary action being taken against the individual.”

A better alternative, depending on the situation, and on the individuals involved, might be to take some time off work to reflect and plan out your next steps.

“For example, if you have vacation days coming up, you might use them to switch off from work, reflect on how you’ve been feeling recently, and think about your future goals and ambitions,” says Skinner.

Once you’ve had some time to think, you might prefer to take practical steps to prepare for your future goals, like looking up training, courses, or starting a new job search.

If the revenge-quitting desire is coming from a need to send a clear message to your employer, you might also consider ways in which you could do this without leaving your job. You could organise a meeting to discuss an issue in a controlled and professional way, and come up with ways to address the problem.

“Are you able to send feedback to the management of the business, or chat with colleagues or peers about how best to approach systemic issues?” says Skinner.

“If you feel you have unprocessed emotions or strong emotional reactions to your working environment, it could also be helpful to seek mental health support through therapy or counselling.”

Yahoo Finance

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 3 June 2025

Avoiding Confrontation, The most common ‘polite-isms’

Revealed: The most common ‘polite-isms’ Britons use to avoid confrontation, and what they REALLY mean

From bad teeth to stiff upper lips, many dated stereotypes surrounding Brits still endure today. 

But new data shows that one stereotype does ring true, Britons really do hate confrontation. 

Researchers from Trinity College London carried out a poll of 2,000 adults in the UK and found that 83 per cent say they avoid confrontation at all costs.

In fact, their study revealed that Britons utter an average of 14 ‘polite-isms’ per day, with many admitting they use them to avoid unnecessary tension.

‘Polite-isms are a fascinating feature of communication, used extensively in the UK, and often reflecting our preference to be indirect to avoid confrontation,’ said Dr Ben Beaumont, Head of English Language Teacher Strategy & Publishing at Trinity College London.

‘But they’re actually not a new trend. We’ve been using them for thousands of years. 

‘There are even examples of polite-isms in the Old English classic Beowulf, which was composed between the 7th and 9th centuries.’

Here, experts have debunked the true meanings of the most common polite-isms, with hilarious results. 

The most common polite-ism wheeled out on a daily basis is ‘Oooh, could I just squeeze past you?’, which really means ‘Get out of my way’.

In second place comes ‘Sounds fun, I’ll let you know’, in turn of ‘I’m not coming’.

Meanwhile, ‘I beg your pardon?’ is the third most common polite-ism, used instead of asking ‘What the hell did you just say?’

Other common turns of phrase include ‘As per my last email’, which everyone knows really means ‘I told you this already’.

And telling someone ‘That’s one way of looking at it’ translates to ‘You’re wildly off the mark.’

One in two participants said they regularly use polite-isms in the office, while 43 per cent said they utilise them around friends.

Almost a third said they believe they are better than being rude or passive aggressive, while a quarter admit hearing or saying them makes them laugh.

Dr Beaumont said polite-isms can be important for people learning how to speak English, especially regarding how to navigate a range of situations.

However, our passion for politeness doesn’t extend to when we’re speaking a foreign language, as 45 per cent of people who can speak another language said they find it easier to say a straightforward ‘no’ when they’re not speaking in their mother tongue.

The poll also revealed that a quarter of people are more direct with their language online than they are in person.

However, a third said seeing their words written out has made them more careful about what they say.

A separate study, published last year, suggests that ‘please’ might not be an all-purpose marker of politeness. 

Rather, it is a more focused, strategic tool to manage frictions or obstacles among family members, friends and coworkers. 

The study, published in the journal Social Psychology Quarterly and written by scientists from UCLA, shows that people say ‘please’ much less often than expected, and mostly when they are expecting a ‘no’ response.   

Whether passing the butter or driving someone to the airport, people say ‘please’ to each other to sweeten a request when they know the other is likely unwilling, either because they have resisted already or because they are busy doing something else.

The findings suggest there should be less effort put into teaching prescriptive, ‘one-word-fits-all’ principles, and more focus on how to be sensitive to the particulars of a situation.

‘Any generic rule, like saying ‘please’ and ‘thank you’, doesn’t take into account the specific situation, and may not always indicate respect or politeness,’ said Andrew Chalfoun, a graduate student studying sociology and lead author of the study. 

‘It may also not be very effective.’

Saying ‘please’ could even be harmful in a given situation.

‘In the wrong context, saying ‘please’ may run the risk of sounding pushy or dubious about another’s willingness to help,’ he added. 

The 20 most common polite-isms (and what they really mean) 

1. ‘Ooh could I just squeeze past you’. Translation: ‘Could you get out of my way?’

2. ‘Sounds fun, I’ll let you know’. Translation: ‘I’m not coming.’

3. ‘I beg your pardon?’ Translation: ‘What the hell did you just say?’ 

4. ‘Sorry I’m a bit busy right now!’ Translation: ‘Please leave me alone.’

5. ‘No rush, when you have a minute’. Translation: ‘Please hurry up.’

6. ‘With all due respect…’. Translation: ‘You’re wrong, and here’s why.’

7. ‘As per my last email’. Translation: ‘I already told you this’.

8. ‘Sorry, could you say that last bit again?’ Translation: ‘I wasn’t listening to a word you were saying.’

9. ‘I hear what you’re saying’. Translation: ‘I completely disagree with you.’

10. ‘Not to worry!’. Translation: ‘This is a disaster, but I’ll pretend everything is fine.’

11. ‘I’ll bear it in mind’. Translation: ‘I’ll forget about this immediately.’

12. ‘It could be worse.’ Translation: ‘It’s pretty much the worst thing that’s ever happened.’

13. ‘That’s one way of looking at it.’ Translation: ‘You’re wildly off the mark.’

14. ‘Just a gentle reminder.’ Translation: ‘I cannot believe you haven’t done this.’

15. ‘Happy to help.’ Translation: ‘I’m having to help, when I really don’t want to.’

16. ‘Appreciate if you could let me know either way’. Translation: ‘I cannot believe you have not replied to me!’

17. ‘I’m sure it’s just me, but…’ Translation: ‘This is entirely your fault, but I’m softening the blow.’

18. ‘It’s not bad, actually.’ Translation: ‘It’s surprisingly tolerable, considering my low expectations.’

19. ‘Happy to discuss.’ Translation: ‘I can’t think if anything worse than discussing this further.’

20. ‘Interesting idea.’ Translation: ‘That’s a really terrible idea.’

Mail Online

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 20 March 2025

Questions to ASK at interview

Don’t waste this opportunity to impress! Ask these instead:


➟ What does success look like in the first 90 days?

➟ What are the biggest challenges facing the team that I could help solve?

➟ How would you describe the management style of the person I’d be reporting to?

➟ What distinguishes your top performers from everyone else?

➟ How does the company support professional development and growth?

➟ What made YOU decide to join this company, and what keeps you here?

➟ What do new employees find surprising after they start?

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 20 March 2025

10 Signs of a Bad Manager!

Here’s how to recognize it:

Poor leadership can cost you your happiness and growth.
Here’s how to spot the red flags early.

These signs can save your career and mental health:

1/ Micromanagement


➠ Obsessively controls everything.
➝ Never trusts the team to own tasks.
➝ Smothers creativity and independence.


No trust = no growth.

2/ Poor Communication

➠ Leaves you guessing.
➝ Clear instructions are missing.
➝ Constructive feedback rarely arrives.

How can you succeed without clarity?

3/ Lack of Empathy

➠ Zero personal connection.
➝ Dismisses personal struggles.
➝ Makes people feel like cogs, not humans.

Empathy fuels connection; without it, morale crumbles.

4/ Steals Credit

➠ Takes all the praise.
➝ Ignores team contributions.
➝ Uses others to boost personal reputation.

True leaders lift others, not themselves.

5/ Unapproachable

➠ Creates a wall of fear.
➝ Discourages honest feedback.
➝ Makes employees feel isolated.

Openness builds trust; fear breaks it.

6/ Inconsistent

➠ Changes decisions unpredictably.
➝ Creates confusion and chaos.
➝ Undermines stability and trust.

Consistency breeds confidence.

7/ Lacks Vision

➠ No clear goals for the team.
➝ Lacks direction and purpose.
➝ Progress becomes aimless.

A team without a vision is a team without momentum.

8/ Plays Favorites

➠ Unequal opportunities.
➝ Benefits the chosen few.
➝ Demoralizes everyone else.

Favoritism destroys unity.

9/ Dodges Responsibility

➠ Blames others for failures.
➝ Refuses to own mistakes.
➝ Weakens the team culture.

Leadership is accountability.

10/ Resists Change

➠ Fears innovation.
➝ Blocks progress.
➝ Stunts team growth.

Adapting is leading.

▶ Don’t let poor leadership cost you your happiness and growth!


Source: https://lnkd.in/dpQn74rq

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 20 March 2025

Brace yourself: reward storm incoming

In even the most optimistic assessment of the current situation, it is hard to foresee a situation where a substantial portion of workers are not left underwhelmed by their pay offers in 2025.

The rise in the national living wage (NLW), due in April, will put a little more in people’s pockets at the bottom end of the scale, but the NI rise on top of that hike is heaping pressure on businesses and putting a squeeze on pay pots as employers seek to mitigate losses. All this hints heavily at another busy chapter in the lives of HR and reward professionals as they reach for a Swiss Army knife of measures to balance dwindling pay pots with the need to attract and retain the best talent. 

Pay structures under scrutiny

Without doubt, pay structures are going to be placed under scrutiny. Consecutive years of NLW rises have combined to create compression within many organisations and the need to review those pay structures. One common approach has been to simplify pay and grading structures: having fewer grades and broader pay ranges can help alleviate compression and enable pay progression to happen without promotion to a more senior role.

The tumultuous nature of things over the last few years, the pandemic, economic volatility and political upheaval at home and abroad, has also made flexibility within pay structures increasingly important. Rigid pay structures and policies allow little flexibility to businesses to navigate change and the upcoming legislation changes are only going to add to that pressure.

How to afford pay progression?

Although inflation is slowing, the cost of living remains high and with pay review budgets under threat many employers face the possibility of a stand-off with their best performers. In our recent Pay Trends survey, 33% of organisations told us that the upcoming increase in employers’ national insurance contributions will impact their pay review budgets and 37% were still undecided. Where we might see the real impact of this is in pay progression.

To balance a squeezed budget against continuing cost of living pressures, companies are going to have less budget to vary any increases applied outside of an across-the-board rise. That pressure for differentiation might come from a variety of factors, for example movements in the market, performance or position within a pay range.

Where budget does exist, tough choices will need to be made in balancing the relative importance of each factor. Should our priority be to keep in line with the market where it moves most quickly? Or should we simply reward strong performance or contribution with larger increases? The answer is likely to be nuanced and specific to each company.

Spotlight on communication

For employees to trust that their pay is being managed fairly, employers need to communicate how pay decisions are being made and, crucially, explain the factors impacting those decisions. Often when businesses look to build greater flexibility into their pay structures, employees can mistake that flexibility for inconsistency. This puts a greater emphasis on transparency and communication.

Being open about pay is relatively easy when the money is there to spend but, when budgets are under pressure and tough decisions needed, that same openness can feel far more difficult. The big issue here is that most employees will fill an information vacuum with their own conclusions. Even if they’re unhappy with the outcome, an open and honest conversation around pay can build that trust in the fairness of the process. Training and empowering managers to do this is becoming increasingly important.

Benefits and flexibility

With costs increasing we’re also likely to see an impact on benefits which were widely neglected in the aftermath of the pandemic and may now be out of sync with many companies’ working practices and cultures. Plans to enhance or introduce new paid-for benefits may be put on hold while costs are managed, but a review of their relevance and the return on investment they are bringing is likely to be a strong measure across the board, in particular seen through the prism of hybrid working and the need for greater flexibility.

Interestingly, one contradictory trend is emerging where companies are trying to move people back into the office for a minimum number of days. It will be intriguing to see how that tension plays out this year because when budgets are squeezed, work/life balance and flexibility are two levers businesses can really pull on when they’re trying to attract and retain the best talent.

Randstad’s recent annual survey into the world of work was ground-breaking in defining what motivates employees. For the first time in the survey’s 22-year history, ‘pay’ was pushed down into second place by ‘work/life balance’ as the highest-ranking motivating factor.

The difference was marginal ,  but not among Gen Zs, who ranked work/life balance a lot higher than everyone else. Given that generation represents the future of the workforce, those ranking places might be there to stay and that is worth pause for thought.

HR Magazine, Cathryn Edmondson

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 20 March 2025

One in five employees are fully engaged at work

More than one in five (21%) UK employees are fully engaged at work, new research has highlighted.

Employee engagement in the UK has increased by 3% from 2024 and is now at a record high, a report published yesterday (11 March) by HR software provider ADP showed.

The report also showed that, although the engagement of employees who work exclusively onsite has been growing each year, only 19% of those employees reported being fully engaged at work. 

Despite employee engagement being at a record high, HR still has work to do, according to Chris Sheppardson, CEO of employee experience consultancy, Creative Spaces.

Speaking to HR magazine, he said: “HR’s work is far from done. It has much to do. HR should sit naturally at the shoulder of CEOs in a way that it has not done for many years. HR should be the sounding board, confidante and human asset planner for the CEO.”

Occupational psychologist Jenny Winspear, echoed this, and stated that employee engagement is in the best interest of leaders and managers. 

She told HR magazine: “[Leaders and managers] should want to keep their teams engaged because they will deliver better results for the business. Employee engagement is arguably one of the most powerful levers for business success. Employee surveys are still a great lever for getting feedback on how to improve engagement. What gets measured gets managed.”

Winspear added that companies that do not back down on DEI initiatives and wellbeing and flexible working policies, will reap the benefits of higher employee engagement.

ADP’s report also found that employee autonomy had an impact on employee engagement. Employees who had much more freedom of choice regarding the location of their workplace reported being more engaged than those who didn’t. Hybrid workers had the highest engagement: almost a third (30%) reported being fully engaged in work.

A quarter of employees (24%) reported having complete control over where they worked. 

The increase in employee engagement may be due to an increase in employee-centric workplaces, according to Tina Benson, founder of events provider Team Tactics.

Benson told HR magazine: “HR and business leaders have had to continually enhance their offerings, providing competitive pay, working conditions, an attractive culture, benefits, learning and development, and work-life balance initiatives.”

“Most businesses also seem to have hit their stride with their preferred post-pandemic working models. They’ve reinforced their expectations and values and established effective ways to bridge gaps and connect colleagues with technology.”

However, only a fifth (20%) of UK employees reported that they are currently working in the best team that they have ever worked with.

The rise in engagement should be viewed as the beginning of a process, stated Steven Frost, CEO of employee engagement business WorkBuzz. 

Frost told HR magazine: “We mustn’t look past that 80% of the workforce that still isn’t as engaged as they could be. Organisations should absolutely celebrate the movement, but it would be a mistake to assume that a small increase in engagement means the job is done.

“Low engagement has a ripple effect across organisations, leading to higher turnover, lower productivity, and a decline in customer experience.

“And the stakes are getting higher, in an ever changing world, with AI-fuelled disruption, having an engaged workforce, embracing change and driving innovation will be a competitive advantage.”

HR Magazine, Lara Bryant

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 December 2024

How to spot AI-generated text at work

At the CIPD’s annual conference on 7 November, lexicologist Susie Dent explained how to spot AI-generated text at work.

“It is difficult to spot AI-generated text,” Dent said, in the final keynote of the conference, “but there are some key giveaways.”

She pointed to words such as ‘delve’, ‘transformative’, ‘dynamic’, ‘navigating’ and ‘multifaceted’, and phrases such as ‘rich tapestry’, ’embarking on a journey’ and ‘game changer’ as indicators that AI has been used to generate text.

“AI absolutely loves the jargon that we are all used to using,” Dent added. 

Employers should be able to detect heavily AI-generated text by focusing on tone and style, according to Ben Keighley, founder of AI recruitment platform Gaia.

Speaking to HR magazine, he said: “The language often stands out as being very slick and polished but lacks references to personal experiences or anecdotal evidence to support the statements made. 

“Look for recurring patterns in structure, overly formal tone, or vague, generic statements that lack specific details about achievements or experiences.”

The number of UK employees using AI at work has increased by 66% in the last year, to 7 million, according to a report published by the consulting and insights firm Deloitte, on 30 May.

Two thirds (68%) of HR professionals, however, had not embraced the full potential of AI, a separate report by HR insights provider Brightmine showed (29 May).

As more employees use AI to help them find a job, employers should be cautious of AI-generated text in the recruitment process, Keighley added.

Two thirds (67%) of HR leaders claimed that AI was the same or better at finding well-qualified applicants, research by recruitment platform HireVue, published on 11 July, showed.

Keighley continued: “There is no surprise that jobseekers and employees are leveraging the benefits of AI to optimise their work and to make efficiency savings.

“The key is to strike the right balance. New or prospective employees should be encouraged to find their own voice in a way that is authentic and honest.

“Recruiters can use AI detection tools, such as AI text classifiers, to flag potentially machine-generated content. Cross-referencing application content with live interviews is another effective strategy to identify discrepancies in tone, phrasing or knowledge depth.

“Employers can clearly communicate expectations around authenticity during recruitment and onboarding, such as requiring candidates to include specific examples or asking direct, experience-based questions in interviews.”

HR should extend the expectation for human judgement to employees’ use of AI in the workplace, Chano Fernandez, co-CEO of AI recruitment software Eightfold AI, told HR magazine.

He said: “AI should not be a replacement for human judgment; while these tools enhance efficiency and provide deeper insights, companies must exercise common sense and rely on humans when ascertaining whether candidates are genuinely suitable for roles. 

“A human-in-the-loop approach ensures fairness, context, and nuance, which are critical for effective recruitment and workforce management.

“In the workplace, this same reliance on AI extends to managing employee productivity and compliance.”

Employers should be cautious that AI-generated language does not impact diversity and inclusion, Dent warned.

She continued: “Once you’re tuned into AI-generated text, you begin to see it over and over. This will affect not just the jargon and simplicity and directness of the language we use, but will also affect the question of inclusivity and diversity of language, and of recognition to the audiences we are talking to.”

Employers should ensure that they have policies to monitor employees’ use of AI at work, Fernandez suggested.

Fernandez continued: “Clear policies are essential for guiding the appropriate use of AI tools. Employers can implement AI monitoring solutions to safeguard data and identify potential misuse, creating a balance between innovation and security.

“What’s clear is that AI is becoming indispensable across all facets of business, including hiring. Its full potential can only be realised with humans guiding the process responsibly.”

HR Magazine, Honey Wyatt

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 December 2024

How to navigate Christmas parties under the new Worker Protection Act

When planning this year’s festive parties, employers must navigate additional legal complexities.

The festive season is upon us and many businesses across the country are gearing up for their annual Christmas parties, a much-anticipated chance for colleagues to unwind, socialise and celebrate the year’s successes. 

However, while these gatherings bring holiday cheer and camaraderie, they can also give rise to significant HR challenges, particularly in informal settings where alcohol may lower inhibitions and blur professional boundaries.

This year, employers must navigate additional complexities introduced by the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023, which imposes stricter responsibilities. Designed to create safer workplaces, the legislation places a proactive duty on employers to ensure their events are free from harassment. Here are some key considerations for how businesses can manage their Christmas parties under the new act.

Understanding the changes 

A critical element of the Worker Protection Act, which came into effect on 26 October 2024, is the introduction of an ‘anticipatory duty’. This duty requires employers to take reasonable steps to prevent harassment in the workplace, including at work-related events such as Christmas parties.

One notable aspect of the new law is the requirement to address third-party harassment. Employers are now responsible for ensuring that external guests, such as clients, contractors or vendors, do not harass employees. Ignorance is no longer a defence; failing to take proactive measures could result in legal liabilities and reputational damage. Under the new law, the employment tribunal can now increase compensation awards for sexual harassment claims by up to 25% if the employer fails to demonstrate that reasonable preventative measures were in place. This makes proactive planning essential for any employer hosting festive events.

Risk assessment tips

Effective planning and risk assessment are essential to ensuring a safe and enjoyable event. By identifying potential risks in advance, employers can take steps to mitigate them.

Here’s how to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment:

  • Choose the right venue: select a location that aligns with your company values and is accessible to all employees, including those with disabilities.
  • Encourage inclusivity: ensure the event theme and activities respect the cultural and religious diversity of your workforce.
  • Manage alcohol responsibly: offer non-alcoholic options and consider limiting free-flowing alcohol. Drink vouchers or gentle reminders can encourage responsible consumption.
  • Review guest lists: If external attendees are invited, ensure that the guest list is appropriate and work-focused, to minimise risks of inappropriate behaviour.
  • Set clear timelines: establish a clear start and end time for the event. This helps maintain professionalism and prevents post-event issues.
  • Plan safe transport: Provide safe travel options for employees, particularly if the venue is remote. Consider organising transport or recommend nearby accommodation to avoid risks such as drink driving or walking home alone late at night. Conducting a pre-event survey can help identify attendees needing assistance to get home safely.

Proactive measures for compliance

Compliance with the new legislation requires more than ticking boxes; take proactive, meaningful steps to prevent harassment, fostering a workplace culture of respect and accountability. Here’s how employers can prepare before, during and after the party:

Before

  • Communicate behaviour expectations: circulate a clear, positive reminder that the party is an extension of the workplace. Highlight acceptable conduct while maintaining the festive mood.
  • Educate attendees: define harassment (both verbal and physical), such as unwelcome comments about clothing or appearance and emphasise the consequences of misconduct, including potential disciplinary action or dismissal.
  • Train managers: equip managers with the skills to identify and address inappropriate behaviour discreetly and effectively.

During 

  • Designate responsible staff: assign approachable, sober individuals to monitor the event and handle any concerns.
  • Monitor interactions, especially where alcohol is involved. Intervene early to de-escalate tensions.

After

  • Encourage reporting: the responsibility doesn’t end when the party is over. Make it clear that employees can report any incidents confidentially and without fear of retaliation.
  • Investigate promptly: address any complaints seriously and in line with company policy. Prompt action shows employees that their safety is a priority.

While the new legislation adds some pressure, it doesn’t mean that the festive spirit needs to be dampened. By planning ahead, communicating expectations, and fostering an inclusive, safe environment, employers can host successful Christmas parties that are both compliant with the law and memorable for all the right reasons.

By Nkolika Ohaegbu, legal director, head of legal advisory services, Rradar

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 December 2024

FTSE 100 board director pay gap narrows

The gender pay gap for board directors of FTSE 100 companies has narrowed slightly in the last year, according to research by law firm Fox and Partners, published today (18 November).

In 2022, the pay gap between male and female board members was 70%, which has declined to 68%, or £335,953 average pay for women and £1.07 million for men, in 2023.

The average pay for women directors has also increased faster than the pay for male board members, with women’s pay increasing 9% in the last year and men’s pay increasing 3% in the same period.

“Boardroom diversity is moving in the right direction but more work is required to ensure this progress continues,” Catriona Watt, partner at law firm Fox and Partners, told HR magazine.

“The gender pay gap is closing but at a very gradual rate. Pay for women is increasing more year on year than pay for men, but this will need to continue apace to show a marked improvement. 

“The number of female executive directors has also risen 10% in the past year which will play a pivotal role in women being employed in positions of higher influence and pay. It is important for team members at FTSE 100 companies to see women in managerial and leadership positions.”

Nearly all (91%) female board members in the FTSE 100 hold non-executive positions, the research noted. 

According to Watt: “To further narrow the gender pay gap at board level, FTSE 100 companies must appoint women to executive positions which are generally the most highly paid corporate jobs, not just non-executive positions.”

Men are eight times more likely to be CEO in the FTSE 100 than women, according to separate research by executive talent firm Russell Reynolds Associates, published on 11 November. 

More than two thirds of senior executive roles in FTSE 100 companies are held by men, although 79% of FTSE 100 chief HR officers are women. 

HR should examine why men and women are paid differently for similar roles, said Aniela Unguresan, founder of the Edge Certified Foundation, a DEI certification standard.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “A board role is more homogenous than the variety of roles that exist in an organisation.

“So what are the objective causes that explain the differences between the different compensation of the board members in a group that is much more homogenous than we see in the rest of the workplace?”

While nomination committees should be trusted to understand what skills are needed on their board of directors, HR should also examine why women are placed in non-executive director roles more commonly, Unguresan suggested.

She continued: “The nomination committees of these boards are doing a very good job in understanding what the skills competencies are, and the profiles that will serve the company best.

“One very interesting follow up question to this study of those nomination committees is: What are the reasons why they have in their boards a higher share of women in non- executive functions? What are the specific skills and competencies that they looked for when they recruited them, as opposed to their male counterparts?”

Female representation on FTSE 350 executive committees fell for the first time in eight years in October, gender parity consultancy The Pipeline found.

HR should invest in women’s career progression, Watt added, to ensure that more women are supported to reach board level.

She continued: “FTSE 100 companies need to continue investing in schemes and infrastructure that promote female opportunities both at boardroom level and beyond. 

“Businesses should invest in mentoring and role-modelling opportunities to make a significant impact on the gender pay gap. 

“Women need to be given the opportunity to gain direct experience that qualifies them for director roles.”

HR Magazine, Honey Wyatt

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 December 2024

How communication skills transform workplace stress

Workplace stress is something almost all of us feel. While awareness of mental health issues has grown in recent years, the impact of stress at work remains a major problem.

A staggering 80% of employees now report feeling stressed at work, up from 76% in 2023, with 74% saying they’re so overwhelmed they struggle to cope with their daily tasks. The costs of this stress are astounding; 17 million working days are lost every year due to stress, along with stress-induced anxiety and depression. The NHS spends more than £11 billion on related health issues annually.

Evidently, something needs to change. The answer is simple: improved communication.

One of the quickest, most beneficial, and most cost-effective ways to tackle the issue of workplace-induced stress is to invest in employees’ language and communication skills. Providing the workforce with the right tools for effective communication can reduce misunderstandings while enhancing collaboration and productivity, ultimately decreasing stress and creating a more positive work environment.

Communication is at the heart of every workplace. Poor communication creates confusion, misunderstandings and isolation, while effective communication builds trust, clarity and a supportive atmosphere that helps ease stress.

However, there’s a fine balance to be struck between too much and too little communication. In the modern workplace, organisations often adopt numerous digital communication tools, such as Slack, Teams and email, with the intention of making communication more effective. However, this increases the sheer volume of communication that employees are expected to manage, which can become overwhelming. In addition, 35% of employees say that their companies fail to give clear guidance on how to use these tools effectively, and don’t provide advice on what is the most appropriate language to use in each context.

This lack of structure and support inevitably leads to inefficiency, frustration and stress. Companies can turn this around by streamlining platforms and offering training on tone, language, and how to communicate appropriately for different contexts.

Conversely, insufficient communication can leave employees feeling invisible and unsupported. When people feel that there isn’t an open dialogue where they can raise concerns or ask for help in the workplace, stress and insecurity pile up. This communication gap can fuel negative assumptions and questions like: ‘Will I look incapable if I raise this concern?’ or ‘Could this hurt my job security?’ Such questions can create a culture of fear, rather than collaboration.

To address this, organisations should prioritise open, empathetic communication, equipping managers with the skills to listen actively and the language skills needed to create an environment where employees feel valued and supported.

The power of inclusive language

Effective communication has the power to build connections or, if done badly, create barriers.

Employers need to work at utilising inclusive language that avoids bias or assumptions, in order for employees to feel respected and valued, with a sense of belonging. Simple changes, like using ‘partner’ instead of gendered terms like ‘husband’ or ‘wife’, or addressing a group as ‘everyone’ instead of ‘guys’, signal respect for diverse identities. Avoiding casual phrases that trivialise mental health, such as “I feel so depressed today,” helps reduce stigma and promotes understanding. This intentional approach to communication not only strengthens workplace relationships but also encourages employees to share ideas and concerns openly, reducing stress and enhancing collaboration across teams.

Challenges in remote work

While remote and hybrid work has its benefits, it also introduces further challenges for internal and external communication. Without the regular informal conversations common in office settings, it’s easy for conversation to become siloed and for employees to feel disconnected.

Asynchronous communication tools like email or Slack are convenient, but lack the depth and ease of face-to-face chats, making it harder to transfer complex ideas, and making misunderstandings more common.

Another issue prominent in many workplaces is language barriers, which can be a significant challenge for people in today’s globalised workforce, where employees come from diverse backgrounds and may be based in various countries. Team members often have differing levels of proficiency in the working language of their workplace.

To address these challenges, companies should provide training and resources to support employees in several key areas: understanding industry-specific jargon, improving proficiency in the team’s working language when necessary, and leveraging video conferencing to capture essential nonverbal cues.

Changing the conversation

Good, effective and inclusive communication is essential for reducing workplace stress and building a healthy, productive environment. By investing in communication training, effective language skills, and fostering a culture of openness and empathy, organisations can create workplaces where employees feel supported, and equipped to manage their workloads. This investment will not only reduce stress but also build a resilient and productive workforce.

By Maria Rechkemmer, expert in business didactics at Babbel for Business

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 25 October 2024

Chief Financial Officer

Manufacturing & MRO £130K, bonus (30%), car all’ce (£10k), LTIP

Warwickshire

Our client is a market leader in its field. The business has expanded to c£50M t/o in recent years due to the vigorous acquisition strategy its offshore PE funded parent has pursued. This activity means it can genuinely offer its customers a one stop shop solution for their needs through combining manufacturing with profitable post sales MRO.

The company has reached a critical point in its development such that it needs to implement group wide, robust financial systems & controls that create a single platform which can seamlessly integrate further acquired businesses. Effective performance of this task will result in improved financial reporting which will in turn support operational & strategic decision making.

The Role:

  • Lead the finance team in a manner that ensures management and statutory accounting information is produced in an accurate and timely manner
  • Work with functional leaders in interpreting financial information, offering advice and guidance which, by definition, will contribute to tactical and strategic input to overall company direction
  • Appraise existing financial systems, policies and procedures, making recommendations to change and improve where necessary
  • Lead and develop the finance team, offering support and encouragement in their achievement of professional qualifications

The Candidate:

You will lead a small team who will be inspired by your can do attitude and effective communication skills which you will use in having a voice in the development of overall business strategy

A qualified accountant with a minimum 5 years in a financial management leadership role.

Experience gained from within a multi-site engineering / service-oriented business is pretty much essential along with proven track record of integrating acquired businesses into existing operations.

A solid appreciation of commercial accounting software would be desirable. Linked to this is experience of appraising an existing financial systems infrastructure then designing and implementing of new systems and processes as deemed necessary to suit the current & future needs of the business

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2024

The great office return

As the world grapples with the future of work, major corporations like Amazon, THG, and Salesforce are making bold moves to bring employees back to the office full-time. Is this a step towards greater collaboration and innovation, or a costly return to outdated practices?

Amazon is the latest business in the UK requesting that employees return to the office full-time. This follows the likes of THG, Salesforce, Boots, Boeing, JP Morgan Chase, and UPS, some high-profile names.

Looking at various industry pieces, I’ve not yet found a consistent narrative for why these companies are reverting to a full-time office policy. My suspicious brain suggests it’s about cost, accountability, and visibility, you must be seen to be heard, and office space costs money. However, another part of me wants to believe that businesses can adapt to new situations.

Balancing this approach, I’ve gathered the top pros and cons from both a business and employee perspective (these are not my personal opinions):

Business Perspective:

Pros: Enhances collaboration, strengthens company culture, and improves productivity and accountability.

Cons: Increases costs, faces employee resistance, and has health and environmental concerns.

Employee Perspective:

Pros: Offers better work-life separation, social interaction, and access to resources that home working cannot provide.

Cons: Remote work provides flexibility, reduces commute stress, and saves costs.

To give you my position on this, I believe in the hybrid approach, however in saying this, not a fixed hybrid approach where it’s exactly 2 or 3 days, I believe that flexibility is required where business demands require.

What are your thoughts on the pros and cons? Will we see a boomerang effect back to hybrid from full-time office working?

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2024

Depression causes employees to move to less stressful jobs

A third (33%) of people with depression reported they have quit their job due to their condition, a report by mental health treatment provider Flow Neuroscience found.

Those aged 26 to 34 were the most severely impacted group, as 46% said they had to move jobs as a result of their depression.

Two thirds (64%) of those who moved jobs due to depression said they did so to find something less stressful and easier to manage, while 43% said they did so to work fewer hours. Nearly half (44%) said they earned less after moving jobs, an average of £334 less per month, or £4,008 per year.

Employers can retain employees with depression by encouraging conversations about mental health in the workplace, according to Erin Lee, CEO of Flow Neuroscience.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “One of the most important things HR can do really goes beyond just dealing with depression, and that’s helping to drive a company culture where there is dialogue around employee wellbeing and mental health.

“There’s little point in having a mental health policy in place, if you’re also telling your employees that they need to be working 80 hours a week.

“We need to recognise that people are very good at masking mental health challenges, particularly in times of economic uncertainty, as they may not want to speak openly at the risk of looking like a liability.”

Flow Neuroscience found 40% of people did not share their diagnosis as they didn’t want to admit something was “wrong with them”, while 39% cited shame as the reason.

Training and resources around how to spot depression should be provided by employers, suggested Annmarie Carvalho, former lawyer and founder of mental health consultancy The Carvalho Consultancy.

“Some of the most effective approaches I’ve seen organisations take is to break down the stigma by creating knowledge hubs of information on their systems including guides around specific mental health issues and training on how to spot signs of issues such as depression in ourselves and in our teammates,” she told HR magazine.

“Any such training offered should be interactive, ideally in person and include small group discussions about common mental health issues that arise and the difficulties of life.

“The training should be mandatory for anyone in a position of management and guides on how to work effectively with mental health issues should be provided to all managers, covering subjects like how to have appropriate discussions with team members about mental health.”

Managers should also help employees with depression manage their workload, Julia Lyons, senior clinical lead at therapy services provider Onebright, told HR magazine.

“While stress and depression are not always directly linked, employees dealing with depression should be supported where possible to ensure that their workload is not perceived as overwhelming or worsening their mental health.

“Each person is different but working with employees that are dealing with depression and offering them the chance to collaboratively think of solutions to manage their day and tasks can support them in these times.

“Part of making this effective is creating an environment where employees feel empowered and comfortable to take decisions which benefit their wellbeing whilst also fulfilling their duties. More than that, it is about helping them feel able to tell a manager when they are having a particularly challenging day, and conversely, when they want more responsibilities.”

Flow Neuroscience surveyed 1,000 people who suffer from depression plus, as well as 2,001 UK adults between 10 May and 14 May 2024.

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2024

Are we sleepwalking into wellbeing washing?

Wellbeing washing is when companies say all the right things on LinkedIn, but don’t genuinely care about their employees’ wellbeing. Instead, they implement cheap, ineffective support to improve the organisation’s reputation. How can we avoid this?

Wellbeing washing come back to bite offending organisations through poor engagement, attrition and reputational damage. But they deserve it, right?

Unfortunately, these outcomes can also affect companies that are trying their best with wellbeing but find themselves sleepwalking into a similar scenario.

How to spot wellbeing washing

Everything might look good to those outside a company: the organisation looks wellbeing-focused and rosy-cheeked. But, to employees, there’s often a disconnect between what the company is saying and the actual working environment.

Over time, the mismatch between what the employer says and what they do can cause damage to engagement, productivity and, ultimately, lead to attrition. It can also affect external perception, such as through Glassdoor reviews.

What is accidental wellbeing washing?

Wellbeing washing, like greenwashing, can be a conscious decision to sugarcoat a reputation in order to achieve a certain outcome, such as becoming an employer of choice, or appealing to socially minded consumers.

By contrast, accidental wellbeing washing happens when a company genuinely cares about employee wellbeing, and does its best to implement an effective and impactful wellbeing strategy, but that strategy fails to meet employee expectations. Accidental wellbeing washing has no malicious intent behind it, but it can certainly affect employees in the same way.

This can happen for several reasons. One of the most common is because wellbeing strategies that appeal to a majority fail to meet the needs of several small cohorts that collectively make up a sizeable proportion of the workforce. This means that the strategy can fail due to lack of inclusion.

Secondly, accidental wellbeing washing can be due to poor choices of wellbeing support. For example, one-size-fits-all solutions that deliver a generic service but struggle to be effective across a diverse population.

Thirdly, it can be due to mismanaged communications with employees. You could have the most effective wellbeing support in the world, but it will fall flat on its face if employees don’t understand its value or how to get access at their time of need.

How can HR avoid this?

The key to avoiding wellbeing washing is to be aware of cohort-specific needs across your workforce. It’s difficult to integrate cohort needs into your wellbeing strategy unless you, or someone in your HR team, has similar lived experience.

The best vendors on the market for wellbeing support provide services that are personalised to individuals. But they also remain aware of the impact gap that can occur when well-meaning employers implement wellbeing support.

Remember, even if you’ve listened to employee feedback, you may only be meeting the needs of the majority. Establishing working groups based on shared characteristics is an effective way to surface cohort needs across your workforce.

After all, you don’t know what you don’t know. But unless you’ve surfaced these needs, how do you really know for sure if your wellbeing strategy is meeting the needs of your workforce?

HR Magazine, Samuel Lathey

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 1 October 2024

Is the ‘big stay’ over?

As the economy begins to recover, we asked HR leaders whether the ‘big stay’, a time when employee turnover and vacancies decreased, is really over.

Around half (49%) of UK employers reported that they expect employee churn to increase over the next 12 months, research by HR software Personio showed (27 August). Six in 10 (60%) employers surveyed also said that they had noticed a drop in staff engagement.

However, recruitment firm Robert Walters has suggested that employees are cautious of moving jobs due to fears of a lack of security. Research conducted by Robert Walters found that 71% of professionals had been deterred from looking for a new job by worries around job security in a new firm.

Becky Wallace, head of people at Learn Upon, told HR magazine that there were signs of the ‘big stay’ ending.

“These latest figures make clear that there is still a lot of uncertainty around what the job market will look like over the coming year, but the market is already showing some signs that attrition levels will rise again,” she said.

“Whilst the ‘big stay’ has been a huge win for HR leaders, who have been working hard to retain staff following years of increased attrition, it has never meant that they were able to take their staff for granted.

“Even when employees are staying put, it is vital that they are given proper support from their organisation that keeps them engaged, satisfied and productive.”

Personio’s research also revealed that 49% of UK employees claimed the improved economy will motivate them to leave their jobs. A third (33%) of employees said that they would be willing to take a pay cut for a more interesting and engaging opportunity.

“What’s evident is that if employees have one foot out the door, they are likely to be less engaged and motivated to do their best work,” said Lenke Taylor, chief people officer at HR software Personio, speaking to HR magazine.

She advised employers to focus on improving employee engagement to prevent attrition rates soaring over the coming months.

Taylor continued: “Employers need to be proactive about improving their employee experience, and through that, improve not just talent retention, but productivity too.

“The best employers are listening to their employees, understanding what’s changing, and working to boost engagement.”

Robert Walters’ survey found that 75% of companies were trying to be more transparent about their company’s performance, to attract professionals concerned about stability. However, 79% of employers saw a decline in the acceptance of job offers this year.

Employers should communicate their company’s performance to attract potential candidates, noted Lucy Bisset, director of Robert Walters North West.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “To attract candidates worried about job stability, employers must be more open about company health. This doesn’t mean divulging sensitive information but offering guidance on things like future plans for continued growth and long-term visions/goals.

“They can go further in discussing what individual progression looks like at the company, highlighting opportunities for career advancement and discussing how professionals’ can carve out a fulfilling career within their organisation.

“Essentially, the key thing here is for employers to effectively communicate their company’s mission, culture, future goals and how prospective employees can integrate into and contribute towards this.”

Robert Walters surveyed 2,000 white-collar professionals in the UK between June and July 2024. Personio commissioned Censuswide to survey 2,002 UK employees and 1,001 HR decision makers between 8 April and 1 May 2024. Both reports were published on 27 August.

HR Magazine, Honey Wyatt

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 15 May 2024

HR has an AI-powered disability problem

Unless the unintended consequences of AI-powered HR technology are urgently addressed, hundreds of millions worldwide face lifetimes of economic and societal exclusion.

AI recruitment tools have become the first line of defence against high-volume online hiring. A recruiter’s priority is to quickly discard as many applicants as possible, to narrow down to the talent deemed worthy of human consideration. An increasingly controversial $38bn-dollar industry stands ready to help.

 Just imagine:

  • You lose your dream job because your stammer caused you to go 15 seconds over the three-minute limit for the video interview.
  • You have a facial disfigurement: the camera doesn’t recognise your face as real.
  • You have significant sight loss but it’s impossible to ask the video assessment to disregard your non-standard eye contact.
  • You usually lip-read …but the interviewer’s a robot.
  • You have used a wheelchair since you were four, but the virtual reality test drops you walking into an ancient tomb. You struggle to even imagine standing up, never mind standing up and solving complex puzzles.
  • And how will you know if your profile, produced by scanning everything you have put online, tells the recruiter you are angry and belong to a disability rights network? Is that why your application got nowhere?

Some thought leaders have begun to address race and gender bias in HR tech, but the world’s more than 1.3bn disabled people are still so excluded from this debate that no one, including HR, has even noticed they aren’t there.

Neither the AI creators nor their HR customers understand disability discrimination.

AI creators often claim they have removed human bias because their process treats everyone the same. But standard processes are inherently discriminatory. Employers must make reasonable adjustments if they want to employ disabled people on an equal, I stress equal, basis. We treat people differently to treat them fairly. Imagine insisting that the next Stephen Hawking climb stairs to the interview because every candidate must do so.

This is not just about the data which, let’s face it, is always ‘disability biased’. Biased data, while deeply problematic, is quite different from the concrete reality of discriminatory assumptions in the ‘science’, then bedded into ways of working, such as refusing to adapt an automated process so a disabled candidate can be accurately assessed.

We see classic ‘market failure’: neither the buyers nor their suppliers understand disability discrimination. Neither party seems to know how to design a fair recruitment process that is both barrier-free for groups with similar access needs (i.e. accessible application forms) and flexible for individuals needing reasonable adjustments so they can demonstrate their potential (i.e. bypassing tests which are not valid for autistic people).

AI creators are not legally obliged, anywhere, to prove their products do not discriminate against marginalised job seekers. Indeed, some argue it is employers under existing equality legislation who will be held accountable. But surely both parties must share liability? Manufacturers and buyers recklessly deploy these tools, having failed to exercise due diligence.

While regulators deliberate liability, HR practitioners, acknowledging the risks, can and should begin to ask their suppliers: “How have disabled people been involved throughout your development and risk assessment process? How does the system adapt for individuals, so that they can be assessed accurately and on an equal basis?”

Then, HR and procurement must combine forces, to mitigate risk to people with disabilities and to the business, and start defining the missing red lines.

Susan Scott-Parker, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 15 May 2024

Employees “don’t seem interested” in benefits on offer

Almost half (48%) of HR directors have reported that employee benefits have had poor uptake because employees “don’t seem interested” in what is on offer.

As part of a survey of 500 HR directors conducted by benefits provider Nous, two thirds (62%) of leaders indicated that the benefits they had on offer did not address what employees need, or were only useful to some of the workforce.

Simon Moyle, CEO of benefits provider Vivup, told HR magazine that employers should be offering staff more choice.

He said: “It is critical that employers tailor their benefits offering to the needs of employees, allowing employees choice. It is no longer good enough, or engaging, for employers to choose a select few benefits that they believe will be well received, and provide them across the workforce.  

“Employers need to listen to the needs of their people across the whole workforce rather than a select few. They then need to make benefits available to all, so their people can choose what they will find most beneficial.”

Moyle noted that popular benefits were: lifestyle savings (such as savings on shopping, holidays or eating out), salary sacrifice benefits like cycle to work schemes, home electronics and cars, or virtual GP options and employee assistance programmes (EAPs).

The HR directors surveyed by Nous referenced flexible working, enhanced pension benefits, enhanced holiday leave, private health and dental care, and free food or drink at work as the most popular benefits their organisations offered.

Luke Sondelski, director of reward at the HR technology firm Personio, explained that HR should regularly review benefit uptake, to ensure that they are meeting employee needs.

He told HR magazine: “Employers should regularly measure if the benefits provided are meeting their goals, by reviewing utilisation data, engagement surveys, pulse polls or employee focus groups. 

“Keeping company benefits under regular review, and leaning into employee feedback in the process is a great way to ensure your benefits are meeting the needs of your talent while reflecting your company’s culture and values.”

A survey by benefits provider Boostworks last month (21 March) revealed that half (54%) of employees were not consulted about the benefits that would improve their work satisfaction.

Responding to the Nous survey, HR directors indicated that benefits were inaccessible to employees: 18% said that the employee benefits they offered were difficult for staff to access, and a third (32%) agreed that leveraging certain employee benefits required too much effort for employees. 

HR leaders cited poor onboarding as the reason for poor benefits uptake, as 20% admitted that there was either a lack of onboarding for employee benefits initiatives, or that onboarding was inadequate. A further 20% reported that employees weren’t aware that certain benefits were available to them.

Sondelski noted that HR should signpost their benefits package to employees.

He commented: “Employers must make sure that they clearly and regularly market and communicate the full range of benefits that are on offer. 

“With rewards, including benefits, an employee generally remembers the basics of what they have, for example a pension plan or medical insurance, but are unaware or forget the full spectrum of what their employer offers.

“A great way for HR or reward teams to think about increasing the effectiveness of their rewards and benefits is to consider them as products they offer to employees. 

“Like any product, marketing and communicating is key to increasing uptake and driving satisfaction amongst your customer.”

Honey Wyatt, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 15 May 2024

Mental health days: do they work?

Employees of the Chinese supermarket chain Pang Dong Lai have been offered up to 10 days of “unhappiness leave”, The Guardian reported. Should UK businesses offer a similar benefit?

For staff at Pang Dong Lai, unhappiness leave days can be taken when employees want, in addition to sick leave and holiday entitlement. Managers at Pang Dong Lai cannot refuse these requests.

In March 2024, the digital wellbeing business Headspace reported that 49% of HR professionals saw increased absences due to mental health in the last year. Work-related stress contributed to significant mental health issues for 40% of employees.

The Office for National Statistics reported that 2.8 million people are classed as economically inactive due to long-term sickness in the UK.

Kelly Tucker, founder of HR consultancy HR Star, said that mental health days could prevent some causes of long-term sickness.

She told HR magazine: “When employees take time off to deal with mental health issues, they are likely to return to work with greater focus and engagement.

“Mental health days can act as a preventive measure, helping employees manage stress before it leads to more serious health problems or burnout.

“Demonstrating care for employee wellbeing improves morale and strengthens loyalty, which can translate into increased work effort and reduced turnover.”

However, according to Tucker, if employers use mental health days, they must define them clearly, to avoid confusion and management problems.

Speaking to HR magazine, she added: “HR should start by defining what constitutes a mental health day and how it differs from regular sick leave or personal days. 

“Develop a formal policy that outlines the procedures for taking mental health days, including any notification requirements and the number of days available annually.”

She noted communications could be used to signpost the option for mental health days to employees: “HR can also collaborate with internal communications to regularly promote available mental health resources and reminders about the policy.”

Bar Huberman, HR strategy and practice manager at HR solutions provider Brightmine, told HR magazine that employers should take a data-based approach, to ensure that mental health days contribute to employee wellbeing.

She commented: “Where mental health days are offered to employees to take as and when they need it, monitoring the uptake should be added to wider absence monitoring, to make sure that there is a full picture of when absences have occurred and why.

“This allows for better intervention should it be needed.”

Huberman added that mental health days can be ineffective in isolation.

She said: “Mental health days should be a part of a wider wellbeing programme. Mental health is a complex issue which needs to be viewed and addressed more holistically, to support employees who are experiencing challenges. 

“For people with mental illness in particular, it is important that line managers are trained in how to support them as individuals, for example by making reasonable adjustments. It is unlikely that a day or two off work will address the cause of a mental health issue on its own.”

Simon Miller, international partnerships director at mental health platform Headspace, suggested that employers should ensure mental health day policies are inclusive of everyone.

He told HR magazine: “It’s also important that HR teams are not just providing space for those in need but also creating a work environment in which all individuals can thrive. 

“For example, not all employees may be in need of a ‘mental health day’, but rather a ‘mental wellness day’ in which they are encouraged to optimise their wellbeing. 

“At Headspace we’ve implemented MINDays every other Friday, offering employees a four-day week every other week. This initiative provides employees time where they can invest in their own positive mental wellbeing, whatever that may look like for them.”

Honey Wyatt, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 15 May 2024

What Are C Level and C Suite Positions?

Understanding the significance of C-level or C-suite positions is vital if you’re interested in leadership within organisations. These roles, from Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to Chief Financial Officer (CFO), hold immense responsibility for shaping a company’s direction and driving success.

But what exactly do these positions entail, and how can individuals climb the corporate ladder to such prestigious ranks? The world of C-level executives is multifaceted, demanding a unique set of skills and experiences that set them apart from other professionals.

The Basics of C-Level Positions

If you’re new to the world of corporate leadership, understanding the basics of C-Level positions is crucial for your professional growth. C-Level positions refer to the highest executive titles within a company, typically starting with the CEO (Chief Executive Officer). The CEO is responsible for the overall success of the organisation, setting strategic goals, and making key decisions.

Reporting to the CEO are other C-Level executives with specialised focus areas. Here are some of the most common C-Suite roles:

  • Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Sets the company’s overall direction and strategy.
  • Chief Financial Officer (CFO): Manages financial risks and oversees financial planning to ensure the company’s financial health.
  • Chief Operating Officer (COO): Oversees daily operations, optimising processes and resources for smooth functioning.
  • Chief Technology Officer (CTO): Focuses on technological advancements and innovation to drive the company forward.
  • Chief Marketing Officer (CMO): Develops marketing strategies to promote the company’s brand and products.
  • Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO): Handles talent acquisition, employee relations, and shapes the organisational culture.

Understanding these roles will give you a solid foundation in corporate leadership dynamics.

Key C-Suite Executives and Their Roles

Let’s delve deeper into the specific roles of key C-Suite executives, each responsible for essential functions within the company’s leadership structure:

  • Chief Executive Officer (CEO): The CEO is the captain of the ship, providing direction, vision, and leadership for the entire organisation. They work closely with other C-suite executives to develop and implement strategies to achieve company goals.
  • Chief Financial Officer (CFO): The CFO acts as the financial custodian of the company. They manage financial risks, oversee financial planning and reporting, and ensure the company operates within budget. In 2024, a growing focus for CFOs is Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting, alongside traditional financial metrics.
  • Chief Operating Officer (COO): The COO is the maestro of daily operations. They ensure smooth day-to-day functioning by optimising processes, managing resources, and overseeing supply chains.
  • Chief Technology Officer (CTO): The CTO is the tech guru, responsible for staying ahead of the technological curve. They identify and implement new technologies to drive innovation and improve efficiency within the organisation. As of 2024, a major focus for CTOs is cybersecurity, with constant threats requiring proactive measures.
  • Chief Marketing Officer (CMO): The CMO is the brand champion. They develop and execute marketing strategies to promote the company’s brand, products, and services to target audiences. In today’s data-driven marketing, CMOs leverage analytics to measure campaign effectiveness and optimise marketing spend.

Qualities and Skills Required for C-Level Roles

Moving from understanding the key C-Suite executives and their roles, it’s crucial to highlight the specific qualities and skills required for C- Level roles in modern organizations.

As a potential C-Level executive, you must possess strong leadership abilities, strategic thinking, and decision-making skills. Effective communication is key in conveying vision and guiding teams towards common goals. Adaptability and a growth mindset are essential to navigate the rapidly changing business landscape.

Additionally, having a deep understanding of industry trends, financial acumen, and the ability to innovate are vital for success at the C-Level. Collaboration and emotional intelligence play crucial roles in building relationships and fostering a positive organizational culture. Continuous learning and a focus on results are indispensable qualities for thriving in C-Level positions.

Challenges Faced by C-Level Executives

Navigating the complex landscape of modern business, C-Level executives often encounter multifaceted challenges that demand astute decision-making and strategic foresight.

One of the primary challenges faced by C-Level executives is the pressure to drive innovation while maintaining profitability. Balancing short-term goals with long-term vision can be a delicate act that requires constant adaptation to market trends.

Additionally, managing stakeholder expectations and maintaining effective communication across all levels of the organization poses another significant challenge.

C-Level executives must also navigate through periods of economic uncertainty, global competition, and regulatory changes, all while fostering a culture of accountability and high performance within their teams.

Successfully overcoming these challenges requires a blend of leadership, resilience, and a forward-thinking mindset.

Tips for Advancing to C-Suite Positions

To advance to C-Suite positions, focus on honing your leadership skills and cultivating a strategic mindset that aligns with the organisation’s goals and values. Actively seek out opportunities to lead projects, demonstrate your ability to make tough decisions, and showcase your capacity to innovate.

Develop strong communication skills to effectively convey your vision and ideas to others. Foster relationships with key stakeholders within and outside the organization to expand your network and influence. Stay informed about industry trends and market dynamics to make informed strategic decisions.

Continuously seek feedback and be open to learning from experiences. Embrace challenges as opportunities for growth and demonstrate resilience in the face of adversity.

Conclusion

Overall, C-level positions such as CEO, CFO, and CTO are crucial roles within organizations, responsible for making strategic decisions and driving business growth.

To excel in these positions, individuals need a combination of leadership skills, industry knowledge, and the ability to navigate challenges effectively.

By developing these qualities and continuously seeking opportunities for advancement, you can position yourself for success in the competitive world of C-suite roles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are Some Common Misconceptions About C-Level Positions?

Common misconceptions about C-level positions include assuming they only handle high-level strategy. In reality, they often dive into operational details.

Don’t overlook their versatility. They’re not just figureheads; they’re deeply involved.

How Do C-Suite Executives Balance Their Personal and Professional Lives?

Balancing personal and professional lives as a c-suite executive involves prioritizing tasks, setting boundaries, and delegating responsibilities.

You must carve out time for self-care, family, and hobbies while efficiently overseeing business operations.

What Is the Average Salary Range for C-Level Executives?

You’ll find that the average salary range for C-level executives varies widely based on industry, company size, and location.

Salaries can range from mid-six figures to multi-million dollar compensation packages, reflecting their high-level responsibilities.

How Do Different Industries Differ in Their Approach to C-Suite Roles?

In various industries, the approach to c-suite roles can differ significantly. Factors like company size, culture, and market demands influence how these positions are structured and the responsibilities they entail.

Factors like company size, culture, and market demands influence how these positions are structured and the responsibilities they entail.

What Are Some Emerging Trends in the World of C-Level Positions?

To stay ahead, embrace emerging trends in c-level roles. Seek innovative leadership styles, prioritize diversity, and adapt to changing technologies.

Stay agile, foster collaboration, and focus on sustainability. Your success hinges on staying current and flexible.

CMD Recruitment

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 21 March 2024

Ghosting isn’t just for dating anymore

Gen Zers are treating employers like bad dates: 93% ghost interviews and 87% have not even shown up for their first day of work.

Most Gen Zers admit to having charmed their way through interviews, secured the job, and signed the contract, only to leave their new boss stranded on the very first day.

Ghosting isn’t just for dating anymore. Now Gen Z are treating their would-be employers like bad dates and not showing up for job interviews or their first day on the job without as much as a phone call.

Employment website Indeed surveyed 1,500 businesses and 1,500 working people in the U.K. and found that job ghosting is rife, with 75% of workers saying they’ve ignored a prospective employer in the past year.

But the youngest generation of workers are by far the worst offenders. 

A whopping 93% of Gen Zers told the global recruitment platform that they’ve flaked out of an interview.

Worse still, a staggering 87% managed to charm their way through interviews, secure the job, and sign the contract, only to leave their new boss stranded on the very first day.

Their reason for doing so? According to the survey, it makes them “feel in charge of their career.”

But it’s having the opposite effect on businesses left high and dry: More than half of businesses surveyed said that ghosting has made hiring more difficult.

Businesses and millennials are at it too

Although Gen Z are the biggest culprits, baby boomers, Gen X, and millennials aren’t off the hook: Indeed’s data found that everyone is guilty of ghosting occasionally.

Almost half of those surveyed said they plan on pulling a disappearing act again, with a third deeming it acceptable to do so before an interview.

However, unlike Gen Zers who feel emboldened by blanking bosses, older workers say they instantly regret it. 

Millennials, for example, are most likely to feel anxious after ghosting and worried that ghosting will negatively impact future opportunities. 

What’s more, while more than half of Gen Zers are repeat offenders, the researchers found that a candidate’s likelihood to ghost again decreases with age. 

Even businesses are joining in: One in five workers complained that a prospective employer has failed to show up for a phone interview, while 23% have been provided with a verbal offer only to be left hanging.

It’s why workers today think that ghosting is fair game: More than half agree that since employers ghost job seekers, it’s okay to do it back.

And, perhaps surprisingly, over a third of companies agree that this sentiment is reasonable. 

The data confirms suspicions, and offers a solution

For many employers, Indeed’s data will finally confirm their suspicions that Gen Z has commitment issues.

Toward the end of last year, an MIT interviewer and finance CEO was so fed up with young candidates not showing up for their interviews that she ranted about it on X, and the now-deleted post went viral. 

“One no-showed after picking the time on my calendar,” Christina Qi, CEO of the financial services firm Databento and an MIT board member, wrote. “Look, I know college isn’t for everyone, but this one meeting could affect where you go for these next four years of your life.”

Like MIT, Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) similarly found that Gen Z is hard to pin down.

The government body was forced to scrap key employment data because young people didn’t bother responding to its telephone surveys.

If employers want to get a hold of Gen Z, Indeed’s data says, they should sweeten the deal: When suggesting ways employers could prevent being ghosted, workers ranked higher pay first, followed by better benefits.

Indeed found that the cost-of-living crisis has exacerbated ghosting, with around 40% of those surveyed admitting that they’re more likely to ghost if they find a job offering better pay or a cheaper commute.

Ultimately, it’s not just about getting the job. For young workers, it’s also about being able to afford to accept the offer.

Gen Zers are being forced to turn down the roles because they can’t foot the bill for the expenses associated with starting a new job, like buying work-appropriate attire and a monthly train ticket.

“It’s clear that the financial offer is the biggest carrot for employers trying to attract talent, with pay, benefits and other factors that support the rise in cost of living likely to prevent a job seeker from ghosting,” concluded Indeed’s U.K. head of talent intelligence, Danny Stacy.

“Of course, not all businesses will be in the position to increase their offer, but being transparent about the financial package from the outset is likely to prevent job seekers from ghosting further along the hiring process.”

Fortune.com, Orianna Rosa Royle

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 21 March 2024

Burnout affects a fifth of UK employees as long-term sick hits record high

A third (35%) of adults experienced high or extreme levels of pressure and stress ‘always’ or ‘often’ in the past year.

Research from Mental Health UK found that 20% of workers needed to take time off work due to stress in the past year as long-term sickness absence reaches a record high.

Brian Dow, chief executive of Mental Health UK, said: “Simply put, the UK is rapidly becoming a burntout nation, and a worrying number of people are taking time off work due to poor mental health caused by stress.”

A third (35%) of adults experienced high or extreme levels of pressure and stress ‘always’ or ‘often’ in the past year.

The news comes as economic inactivity due to long-term illness reached a record high last year, according to data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

A total of 2.58 million people are off work due to long-term illness, a figure that has risen by 449,000 since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in January 2020.

In separate survey from the CIPD and the insurance company Simplyhealth, 76% of people reported stress-related absence in their organisations in 2023.

Dow said that employee mental health has taken a hit as the cost of living crisis and global tensions continue.

He said: “High levels of work absence due to poor mental health is a major challenge, but its causes are complex. Public attitudes and understanding towards mental health and work have changed, particularly as the workplace transformed overnight in response to the pandemic.

“Meanwhile, we live in unprecedented times. Life outside work has become increasingly difficult due to the cost of living crisis and pressures on public services, while global challenges such as climate change and artificial intelligence fuel stress, anxiety and feelings of hopelessness.”

Mental Health UK’s research found factors contributing to burnout include a high or increased workload or volume of tasks (54%), working unpaid overtime beyond contracted hours (45%) and feeling isolated at work (42%).

The study also found 38% experienced stress due to taking on additional work because of the cost of living crisis.

Nebel Crowhurst, CPO at HR platform Reward Gateway, said employers can support employees through effective benefits packages.

She told HR magazine: “A great response by employers could help workers feel truly supported in their personal lives. For instance, during the cost of living crisis, benefits like interest-free loans on white goods could dampen some immediate financial worries. Or employers can show their support for big life decisions with staff benefits such as fertility support with family planning or mortgage advice.”

Over half cited having a healthy work/life balance (56%) would help prevent burnout, while four in 10 said having a supportive line manager (43%) or supportive colleagues and peers (42%) would help. 

Other leading factors included reasonable adjustments at work (38%), professional support for mental health such as employee assistance programmes or coaching (29%) and organisations offering staff training around mental health at work (24%).

Dow said the government and employers must put a plan in place to manage the burnout crisis.

Nearly half of workers (49%) said their employer doesn’t have a plan to spot signs of chronic stress and prevent burnout, while 22% don’t know if their employer has such a plan in place.

Dow said: “What is clear is that we urgently need government to lead a national conversation about how we can best help people to stay in or return to work, given the positive impact that secure employment has on mental health. Part of this will involve looking at how employers can better spot and manage stress before it becomes burnout. 

“But the onus isn’t just on organisations, and while it is positive that staff are more likely to raise concerns about stress and mental health than in the past, we will need to consider what support and adjustments from employers are reasonable. 

“There will be no simple, one-size-fits-all solution, but a failure to properly understand and address the challenges faced will threaten our long-term health and success as a nation.” 

 Mental Health UK polled 2,000 UK adults

HR Magazine, Millicent Machell

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 21 March 2024

Your Boss Is Leaving for Another Job. Should You Follow?

When your boss leaves for a new company, it can be tempting to try to follow them, especially if you’ve had a strong working relationship and built up trust. But is it a good idea? In this article, the author offers advice from Nancy Rothbard, a professor of management and the deputy dean at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and Arika Pierce Williams, a leadership development consultant and the president and founder of Piercing Strategies. They outline five questions to ask yourself before making the leap: 1) Do I know why my boss is choosing to leave? 2) How critical has my boss been to my success? 3) How worried am I about the organization’s future? 4) Do I have the option to leave, and do I really want that? 5) Has my boss explicitly offered me a job?

When your boss leaves for a new job, it can trigger a wave of introspection. You might find yourself thinking about your goals, your sense of loyalty, and whether your own career is headed in the right direction. Perhaps most importantly, the departure raises a question: Should you follow?

It’s natural to feel worried or uneasy about what lies ahead either way, according to Nancy Rothbard, a professor of management and the deputy dean at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. “The psychological reality that many people experience when their boss leaves is fear,” she says. “They wonder, ‘What’s going to happen to me if I stay or if I go?’” The decision to follow your boss requires careful consideration. You’re not just switching workplaces, after all. You need to reflect on your priorities, principles, and where you see yourself in the future.

In the end, it’s up to you, says Arika Pierce Williams, a leadership development consultant and the president and founder of Piercing Strategies. “You have to own your career,” she says. “Your boss can influence its direction but shouldn’t control it.” Here, according to Rothbard and Williams, are the five questions you need to ask yourself before you follow your boss to a new opportunity.

1. Do I know why my boss is choosing to leave?

People move on from jobs for many reasons, your boss included. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re miserable or that they think your current company is doomed. “They might want more money or career advancement or better work-life balance or just the chance to do something new and different,” says Williams.

And while it’s impossible to know exactly what’s driving their decision, it’s worth trying to understand your boss’s motivations when you’re considering following them out the door. Williams recommends asking your boss to have an offline, one-on-one conversation. They’re likely to be more candid in private than they are in public with the team. “Try to learn what they think the new organization or opportunity offers that their current one lacks,” she says. 

Having this information can help you make more informed decisions about your own path, she adds. It might also prompt you to look closely at your role and organization and see if it matches your personal and professional goals.

2. How critical has my boss been to my success? 

Your boss’s departure is likely to have a deeper impact if they’ve been more of a mentor than a manager to you. You might worry about your career growth without their guidance, or your standing at your company without their advocacy on your behalf, says Rothbard.

“The departure could leave a hole in terms of your support network within the organization,” she says.

Rothbard recommends evaluating the breadth of your connections at work, or what she refers to as your personal “ecosystem of sponsorship.” Look at potential avenues for growth and advancement. If you have mentors and sponsors other than your boss, and if you see possible ways to move up in the company without your boss’s direct backing, this departure could be a chance for you to explore new opportunities. It might even be a way to step out from under their shadow.

“But if you don’t have other sponsors and you don’t see a pathway for growth without the support of your boss, that’s when you’re going to be more concerned about remaining,” she says.

3. How worried am I about the organization’s future? 

Your boss’s leaving has an effect on your career trajectory, but it also has implications for the larger organization. “You’re not just thinking, ‘What’s in it for me,’ but also, ‘Where’s this company going and what’s going to happen to it as a result of this departure?’” says Rothbard.

This is especially true if you subscribe to your boss’s vision and leadership style. “If you believe this person is so essential to the organization’s future, you’re going to be more worried about their leaving,” she says.

Rothbard suggests taking a hard look at the potential successors in line for your boss’s position, assuming you’re not among them. Consider whether you trust these prospective leaders to guide the organization in a way that fits with your values, or if you fear they might steer it in a direction that concerns you.

This is also a prime time to have a skip-level conversation with your boss’s boss about your future, adds Williams. True, you might not be ready to move into your boss’s role, but there might be an opportunity to assume some of their responsibilities. “It’s a moment to look at the gaps in your technical and leadership skills,” she says. “Get clear on what you’re working toward and the things you need to accomplish before you’re seen as ready to step into a larger role.”

4. Do I have the option to leave, and do I really want that?

These considerations might be moot, at least in the near term, if you don’t have an explicit offer from your boss or another opportunity lined up, notes Rothbard. “It’s a luxury to quit your job,” she says. “And it’s hard to be idealistic about your career without an available alternative that aligns with your values.”

In this case, you might need to stick it out, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Your boss’s announcement might have initially stirred emotions and concerns, but with time, things tend to settle. You might find that your career can progress even without your boss’s cheerleading. And the company can continue functioning without them. 

“We often have a gut reaction to things and sometimes we’re wrong,” she says. “You might need to give others the benefit of the doubt.”

Lacking an immediate escape route is also an opportunity for some soul-searching, says Williams. Change is hard; it’s understandable why you dread having to start from scratch with a new manager. “Getting assigned a new boss can feel like starting your job all over again,” she says. But your inclination to cling to what’s familiar might not be the wisest career move, she says. “Having someone you trust, like a career coach, mentor, or friend, can be helpful in sorting through these feelings and getting unbiased advice.”

5. Has my boss explicitly offered me a job?

For starters, don’t feel slighted if your boss hasn’t asked you to come with. “It might not have occurred to them, and it might not be in their thought process to even ask,” says Rothbard. 

But if you’re close with your boss and you value your professional relationship, it’s worth exploring the possibility. Rothbard points out that it could be mutually beneficial for your boss to consider bringing you along. She cites research that suggests that hiring high-functioning groups of people who already work well together tend to quickly get up to speed in new organizations. Their established relationships and trust allows them to hit the ground running and make an immediate impact. 

No need to be pushy or desperate. Simply ask whether there could be a role for you at the new organization, says Rothbard. “It might not be starting tomorrow; it might be two months from now or even later in the future. But it’s good to keep that dialogue open.”

And yet, don’t get carried away and assume that your boss always knows best, cautions Williams. “Reach out to the people who would be your colleagues so you can understand what the opportunity entails and what the culture of the organization is like,” she says. “Your role might look very different at the new company from your current one.”

Having a boss whom you trust with your career is a beautiful thing. But remember: bosses are humans, too, “and they can operate selfishly,” says Williams. “They might want to bring you along because it makes their life easier.”

Harvard Business Review

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 21 March 2024

Quarter of employees do not trust their CEO

Over a quarter (26%) of employees do not trust their CEO to be honest and transparent, according to HR software company Personio.

The research found 28% of employees are not given a chance to share feedback with leadership on their experiences. 

Less than half (46%) of employees feel that leadership in their organisation actually listens and acts on any feedback given from staff.

Pete Cooper, director of people partners and analytics at Personio, told HR magazine that listening to staff is a key part of building trust.

He said: “Organisation heads need to create a two-way conversation with their employees. Not only giving their workforce the opportunity to give feedback, but also demonstrating that their feedback is being carefully considered and addressed. After all, no one wants to feel they are shouting into a void.

“Leadership and HR teams need to be rational and intentional about when feedback is collected, and communicate clearly how it will be evaluated and actioned.”

The research found just 5% of employees perceive their organisation to be ‘very transparent’ about pay at all levels, the results of employee surveys, training budgets and opportunities, and non-salary rewards and compensation.

However, this 5% are most likely to report high satisfaction, performance and loyalty compared with other employees surveyed.

Most (91%) of all these employees report high productivity and motivation at work.

Paula Leach, founder of Vantage Points consultancy, told HR magazine that internal communication should remain a priority for leaders despite their busy schedules.

She said: “Many leaders are simply overwhelmed and too busy with their day-to-day meetings and commitments to have the space and time to employ deep connection and genuine focus towards communications. 

“Indeed for many leaders and executives, communication is delegated and while this is one form of useful communication, unless complemented by experiences by employees of more personalised and localised listening and dialogue, the leader feels distant and out of touch.”  

HR Magazine, Millicent Machell

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 December 2023

Navigating the mental health maze: the corporate world’s new challenge

Although you won’t see government ministers doing daily TV briefings about it, we are currently in a ‘second pandemic’. This time, though, its effect is mostly mental, rather than physical.

The phrase was coined by mental health charity Mind, in the wake of its survey which found a third of adults and young people reported their mental health had got much worse since March 2020.

Even pre-pandemic, one in four adults experienced mental ill-health at some point in their lives. And the ripple effect of that on individuals, communities and workplaces is devastating.

More recent research using 338 systematic reviews demonstrated that depression and anxiety are still consistently higher now than pre-pandemic.

Another study found that pandemic-related shifts in sleep, substance abuse, physical activity and diet also have a direct negative impact on mental health.

The hard truth is current mental health support cannot meet the 175% increase in demand, with many individuals unable to access support either through perceived or actual barriers.

The ‘hard to reach’ in mental health lack adequate service provision.

Workplace wellbeing isn’t working

In the workplace, poor psychological wellbeing leads to a lack of coping and resilience, low self-worth, poor communication and, crucially, absenteeism and burnout.

The cost of poor mental health is £56 billion to UK employers, according to a 2022 Deloitte report.

Approximately 61% of employees who are considering leaving work state that this is due to their mental health.

Traditional solutions to health promotion and treatment have focused on information.

But here’s the thing: the supply of information alone does not lead to behaviour change if, like the ‘hard to reach’, your willingness to engage with helpful treatment is low.

In other words, a one-way broadcast of help isn’t helping.

Alongside this, workplace solutions to staff wellbeing usually focus on the employer ‘giving’ things.

Think of those LinkedIn job ads that list free fruit and table football as covetable perks.

Their efficacy is debatable at best but, that aside, the fact is that work cannot keep giving more if it seems to make no discernible difference to corporate wellness.

A new way is needed.

At the moment, few corporate wellbeing platforms offer skill development and behaviour change tools.

Some digital apps for mental health have started to recognise this but there is much room for development and innovation.

Making wellbeing apps skill-based and gamified, for example, will help engage those usually unwilling to connect with traditional wellness approaches.

The gamification of wellbeing

For proof from the consumer tech world, look no further than the recent success of Pokémon Sleep, which racked up 3 million global downloads in the two weeks from release in summer 2023.

For the uninitiated, it’s a mobile game that the user leaves open next to them at night.

It listens to their breathing patterns and, in the morning, they wake up to discover a new Pokémon with similar sleep habits.

How the app retains users long-term is to be determined.

It may be like Pokémon Go, where 80% of players stopped using it in the first few months, but a solid group of power players drove revenue.

Either way, it’s a fascinating case study of the power of gamified wellness tech that drives behaviour change.

Mental health for many remains a difficult subject to admit vulnerability to or problems with.

It also remains an area without adequate learning, skill development or understanding around how we think and what we can do about it.

The growing mental health crisis has prompted many practitioners to call out for greater awareness around how individuals can support themselves and how we can all increase our skill set to act as mental health ambassadors in our social and family spaces.

We need to increase visibility of how individuals can take accountability and responsibility for their own mental health development while avoiding a ‘victim blaming’ approach. 

Of course, we can’t remove stress, workload pressure, deadlines and difficult relationships in the workplace.

However, what we can do is support the individual to learn skills and techniques for coping.

To support learning and the creation of a ‘coping toolbox’ which the employee can draw on when they feel overwhelmed and anxious.

Like a muscle, the more that an individual can draw on their own resilience, then the stronger it will get.

Does behavioural science hold the key?

What’s also often missing in wellbeing solutions is a foundation of behaviour change theory.

This is an important omission because our attempts to enhance mental health and change the way people think and see the world must be rooted in behaviour change.

Behaviour change and skills development opportunities allow employees to take responsibility for their physical and mental health and to learn a series of behaviour change skills which can help them to not only ‘manage’ in the workplace, but also thrive.

Little wonder, then, that digital behaviour change interventions (DBCIs) are currently at the forefront of the health industry.

A DCBI is an innovative, interactive and iterative application that focuses on mental health and skill development.

It’s also something that employers can invest in with the knowledge that it will be wide reaching, accessible (reaching the ‘hard to reach’) cost-effective and sustainable. While some wellness solutions might feel like a management tick-box exercise, DBCIs are science-based, skills-led and have been proven, time and again in studies, to be truly effective.

Developing a DBCI requires that we first consider what needs to change in order for the behaviour to change. In essence, to undertake a behavioural diagnosis.

We tend to make assumptions around why people behave in the way they do, but these assumptions are often incorrect and lead to ineffective interventions.

To help individuals make the leap from intention to action, we need to create the bridge that runs between the two in order to support the majority of people who are stuck, but who have intent.

A product which is founded in behaviour change theory will do this much more effectively than one that is not.

Following extensive reviews, successful behaviour change has been classified into clusters.

Research shows us that there are 16 clear and tested ways which we know are scientifically proven to change behaviour.

These range from goals and planning to feedback, monitoring, repetition and self-belief. What works for whom, and when, in relation to the behaviour change techniques increases the complexity of altering behaviour.

This is where tech that can crunch big data comes in.

However, we must recognise that DBCIs are not a one-size-fits-all solution. They are one tool among many that can improve mental and physical health, and their effectiveness may vary among individuals.

In conclusion, the mental health crisis demands an innovative approach that transcends traditional wellness programmes.

By embracing DBCIs, we can empower employees to take charge of their mental health, fostering a workplace environment where resilience and wellbeing is the norm, paving the way for a healthier, more resilient workforce.

It’s time to connect with the ‘hard to reach’ and ensure every workforce isn’t just surviving, but is thriving

HR Magazine, Nicola Eccles

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 December 2023

Hot topic: When is drug testing fair?

Athletes, police officers and members of the armed forces have historically been drug tested, but employers in other sectors are beginning to follow the practice. When is it fair to ask employees to take the test?

Martin Tiplady, managing director, Chameleon People Solutions

There is a lot of fuss about the extent that drug tests intrude into personal lives. Some of that fuss is misguided. 

By and large, individuals choose which industry to work in and as part of this, should accept the protocols and standards that accompany that industry. 

In certain functions, the need to be ‘clean’ at all times is paramount.

The need is not just for the individual’s reputation and standing, but also for the employer and its reputation and most importantly, for the recipient of the service.

It is important, therefore, to have in place checks that can verify that standard. 

Random testing is part of that, and it is entirely appropriate and reasonable to have such a requirement in place. That said, employers must be open and transparent about what they are doing and why, and be selective about which roles are required to be tested.  

The standard of record-keeping should be meticulous and extra special care taken to protect personal medical records.

Roujin Ghamsari, founder, Mappd HR

Drug and alcohol testing can be deemed fair when prompted by concerns for public safety, but it necessitates a considerate approach that prioritises transparency, employee wellbeing, and avoids punitive measures.

The cornerstone of maintaining fairness is the way these tests are administered.

Widespread testing of all employees, regardless of their responsibilities, can infringe upon individual privacy and foster a culture of mistrust, creating an overly parent-child dynamic between employers and employees.

Organisations must articulate the reasons behind testing and establish transparent policies, ensuring employees comprehend that the primary objective is safety, not punitive measures or unwarranted intrusion into their personal lives.

Equally crucial is the provision of support for employees who test positive. Approaches centred on punishment may deter individuals from seeking help and perpetuate a climate of fear.

Organisations must give priority to access to treatment and support services for employees grappling with substance abuse or mental health issues, with their health and wellbeing taking precedence.

Alana Penkethman, associate, Laceys Solicitors

As with most employment issues, blanket policies will inevitably lead to disputes.

While many contractual handbooks contain clauses asking employees to consent to testing, employers must always proceed with caution when relying on consent alone due to the inherent imbalance of power in the relationship.

An employer may have fair reason for testing if the job involves high-risk activities such as operating heavy machinery or driving.

However, whilst an employer may be tempted to test if an employee is suspected of being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, particularly if there are concerns regarding productivity or absenteeism, this should be addressed following the appropriate disciplinary policy.

So long as the employer behaves reasonably, there should be no need to test, and doing so is likely to be perceived as an unwarranted invasion of personal life. 

By creating a culture of transparency and support, employers can ensure that employees understand the need for drug and alcohol screening, and it is carried out with respect for individual rights.

Lisa Moore, senior employment solicitor, Harper James

Employers have a duty to ensure a safe place of work. Not only can alcohol and drugs increase health and safety risks, but they can also have an adverse impact on performance and attendance, notwithstanding reputational damage that may arise.

However, both routine and random substance testing can result in employees alleging that their right to privacy has been violated and that the implied term of trust and confidence has been breached.

Thiis could include where consent has not been obtained in advance, the basis for the testing is not deemed to be fair, reasonable, or proportionate and where results have not been handled appropriately. 

Criticism could similarly arise where consideration has not been given to other less intrusive means available that could have achieved the same result for the business.

HR Magazine, HR Editorial

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 December 2023

Remote jobs flooded with applicants as majority of recruiters struggle

A study found 305 workers apply to every remote job advert, while three quarters of employers struggle to fill vacancies, according to flexible working accreditation Flexa.

Almost half (41%) of workers were searching for remote-first jobs, where there is no obligation to come into the office. 

Yet the number of remote-first jobs on offer fell by 22% between July and September 2023.

Employee expectations have shifted dramatically since the pandemic, according to Jess Lancashire, CEO of flexible working consultancy From Another.

She told HR magazine: “It’s understandable why job seekers and employers may feel at odds right now. Each side has valid needs, but the rapid shift to remote work has led to differing expectations.  

“Employees expect more autonomy now that working remotely has become normalised. However, not all employers have fully grasped the new skills needed to oversee hybrid or remote teams effectively. 

“This can lead them to try enforcing old policies around set hours and office presence.” 

However, employers cannot afford to lose out on candidates who prefer flexible working, according to Claire Campbell, consultancy co-director at flexible working advisory Timewise.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “We know from CIPD data that four million people are walking away from jobs that don’t offer enough flexibility. 

“You would think that this would inspire more employers to offer flexible working at the point when a job is advertised, it’s the ultimate recruitment tool. Yet old hiring habits die hard.”

She added that employers and candidates should be more open about whether they are able to offer or want flexible working.

“At the moment, employers and candidates are both understandably confused. Employers are often offering remote working to their current employees but fall shy of including this in a job advert, in case they change their hybrid approach in the future. 

“Candidates who would like flexibility are afraid to raise the question in case it is held against them and will often choose not to apply. And so we reach an impasse.”

Job adverts for roles offer one or two work from home days a week doubled to 21%, but just 6% are looking for them.

The research also found the percentage of jobs advertised as work from home three or four days per week fell from 46% in July 2023 to 35% in September.

Molly Johnson-Jones, CEO of Flexa, said employers are losing out on applicants by not advertising the flexibility they do have properly.

She said: “A huge majority of companies still offer some degree of location-based flexibility. 

“Many employers undersell their offering by thinking that they can only lay claim to location-based flexibility if their staff work from home year-round. 

“This risks companies losing out on tons of talent that would rather have the option to use office space some of the time, and work from home on other days, an arrangement that arguably offers staff the most choice of all.” 

Flexa analysed 360,000 job searches and over 2,200 job adverts between July and September 2023.

HR Magazine, Millicent Machell

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 7 December 2023

Flexibility | Workers want a four-day week, but only if they continue to work remotely

75% of workers say that they’ll only be interested in a four-day week if remote work is allowed “all or nearly all of the time”.

In the survey from Morning Consult, 87% of workers said they would be interested in a four-day work week and 82% believed that widespread adoption would be successful. Yet, an overwhelming majority (75%) said that they will only be interested in a shorter week if remote work continued to be a significant aspect of their week.

93% of Millennials and 88% of Gen X were the generation groups who were most open to a shorter week. Many having joined the workforce over the pandemic, younger workers seem more likely to embrace unprecedented work habits and prioritise their wellbeing and work-life balance.

“Since the COVID pandemic, the whole world of work has been completely transformed,” Joe Ryle, Director of the Four Day Week campaign, told the HR Grapevine podcast. “In many ways, people had their eyes opened to the fact that we can work differently. There’s a sense that the world of work is being reimagined. I believe this has opened the door to new ideas like a four-day week.”

At-home work trumps everything

With the passing of the Flexible Working Bill, employers might need to prepare themselves for workers demanding a variety of different patterns, including a four-day week. But the above figures suggest that maintaining a level of flexibility around remote work might be more important than a shorter week on its own.

This comes at a time when a large swath of companies, including Google and JPMorgan, are manadating their workforce return to the office and increase productivity.

Yet, this research is particularly poignant considering the success of the world’s largest trial of a four-day week, set up by The Four Day Week campaign, which saw 61 companies enter the trial and 56 of those firms continue with a shorter week post-trial.

The campaign says that workers are able to be as productive in a shorter week as they are in a conventional five-day week, and points to the benefits a shorter week could have on the economy.

“Essentially, we need to reduce working hours,” continues Ryle. “The hours we are putting in are too long, and that’s causing burnout, stress and overwork. We know that 18million working days are lost every year to work-related stress. That’s a problem for our wellbeing and health, but it’s also having a negative effect on the economy. We are working some of the longest hours in the world while having one of the least productive economies.”

HR Grapevine, Serena Haththotuwa

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2023

Show us the money! Is the UK falling behind on pay transparency?

With the Times reporting that over half of UK job adverts do not display salary or pay brackets, could the push for pay transparency be over?

Research conducted by Adzuna showed only 51% of job adverts displayed salary information in April 2023, down from 61% the previous year, suggesting that the UK could be falling behind.

Clearly advertising the salary or salary range for a role can be attractive to jobseekers and may result in more applications, as it allows them to make an informed decision about whether the vacancy is competitive with their current job.

It can also reflect well on the company, as it demonstrates a confidence in the salary on offer and their business as a whole.

Alternatively, not advertising the salary in the job description suggests to potential candidates that the salary might not be competitive within the industry, with most job seekers believing that businesses would be happy to advertise a good salary as a benefit.

However, displaying a salary on a job advert may not be as straightforward as it seems.

Businesses need to be aware of a number of pitfalls, including the possibility that current employees may see a similar role to theirs being advertised at a higher rate of pay, which may cause resentment among the workforce.

It might also risk confusion, as employees may not be aware of the background requirements such as skills, years of experience, and level of responsibility; all factors that influence pay.

Without this background knowledge, employees may jump to conclusions about their own salary, potentially creating a hostile workplace environment.

It is also important to note when stating a salary range, candidates will generally expect to be paid near the top end of the bracket regardless of their qualifications or experience.

They may feel duped if they are then offered the bottom end of the range, which may sour the relationship between the business and the new employee from the outset, or even lead the employee to reject the job offer altogether.

The most important step employers need to take when considering a pay transparency policy in their workplace is to conduct an audit of current pay levels to ensure there aren’t any inconsistencies or the potential for unfairness.

Marked differences in pay packets could lead to employees making claims under the Equality Act 2010, which prohibits pay secrecy clauses that actively try to prevent employees from discussing pay information when they are seeking to uncover differences that may be linked to a protected characteristic, which could in turn lead to a claim of discrimination.

It is also important that employers are not drawn into negotiations with individual employees that may cause them to fall foul of the Equality Act.

For example, studies show that men are more likely to negotiate a higher salary than women, so agreeing to negotiations without considering current salaries within the wider team is risky and may well create ticking timebomb.

Although it is unlikely the UK will be making pay transparency a legal requirement in the immediate future, it is not completely off the table.

Employers should also remember that salaries are just a part of the package, both in terms of remuneration and the wider employee benefits. Employees may well take a lower salary if the benefits are good, and the employer offers flexible or agile working.

However, for most job seekers, transparency around pay is highly attractive, and if done correctly, can lead to high levels of applications from skilled workers.

Matt McDonald, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2023

Degrees may no longer be a requirement as skills-based hiring surges

LinkedIn data shows a 90% increase in the share of UK job postings not requiring a degree between 2022 and 2021.

Recruiters are now five times more likely to search by skills over degrees globally, while 75% of recruiting professionals predict skills-first hiring will be a priority for their company in the next 18 months. 

Employers are increasingly recognising the value of skills-based hiring according to Josh Graff, managing director, EMEA and LATAM at LinkedIn.

He said: “A degree is not the only indicator of talent and businesses are increasingly recognising that. 

“For students who didn’t quite get the A-level results they worked and hoped for, it’s important to remember that skills can be learned in many different ways and there are many different paths into careers.”

“Degrees will always be critical for certain jobs but there are a number of exciting opportunities and alternative routes out there for people who didn’t go to university.”

The study found that in the UK, companies can expand their talent pools by nearly 10 times when adopting a skills-first approach.

The majority (77%) of UK employees agree that as the world of work is changing so quickly, it is more important today to continually learn new skills than it was 20 years ago.

Petra Tagg, director of employment agency Manpower, said skills-based recruitment will help lessen labour shortages.

She said: “As competition for skilled candidates remains high, it’s vital that employers acknowledge and adapt to this shift. Skills-based hiring and training will help to widen talent pools across many industries that require specialised skills but are struggling to find exact matches right now. 

“In this context, it’s important for businesses to embrace uncertainty and make fast decisions, with an open mindset and a talent-centric approach when it comes to recruiting, focusing on a candidate’s learnability and capabilities.”

Tagg said relying on qualification requirements can exclude candidates from low-income backgrounds.

She added: “Strict needs for qualifications can narrow talent pools, especially with the cost of higher education putting some people off from more traditional academic routes into work. 

“With apprenticeships and in-work training gaining traction, many candidates today are seeking more experiential and vocational education.” 

Millicent Machell, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2023

Sick leave hits 10-year high in cost of living crisis

UK employees missed work for an average of 7.8 days over the past year, the highest level in over a decade, according to new research.

Over 76% reported stress-related absence in their organisation in the past year, compared with 79% during the pandemic, a survey from the CIPD and insurance company Simplyhealth has found.

Rachel Suff, senior wellbeing adviser at the CIPD, said the cost of living crisis may be behind many workers’ mental health-related absences.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “The main cause of long-term absence is mental ill-health with stress also a major cause, and the cost of living crisis could undoubtedly be a contributing factor. 

“We know that money worries can cause or exacerbate poor mental wellbeing. Minor illnesses are always by far the top cause of short-term absence, but mental ill-health and stress also feature.”

While the causes of short-term absence are minor illnesses, musculoskeletal injuries and mental ill health. 

The causes of long-term absence are mental ill-health, acute medical conditions, such as stroke or cancer and musculoskeletal injuries. 

The findings also show that 37% of organisations reported Covid as still being a significant cause of short-term absence.

There has been a recent spike in hospitals and the new Pirola variant has began to spread. 

Suff added that HR teams need to identify and address the main risks to their workforce’s health.

She said: “Organisations need to ensure they are addressing the main risks to people’s health at work, including psychological health where they can carry out a stress audit to identify the causes. 

“It’s important they adopt a systematic health and wellbeing approach based on prevention and early intervention to improve health outcomes for people. Where needed, adjustments to work and working patterns can help people to manage their wellbeing alongside work.”

The survey analysed trends in sickness absence and employee health and wellbeing among 918 organisations, representing 6.5 million employees. 

Millicent Machell, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2023

Almost one in FOUR people think a job interview is less stressful than selling their motor

What’s the most stressful thing you can do? Move house? Organise a wedding? Maybe do your taxes or take an exam? 

Well, it’s true that these can induce anxiety, but there’s one thing that trumps the lot, and that’s selling a car.

Because an exclusive survey for Cazoo has found that nearly seven out of ten of us find the whole business of getting rid of a motor stressful.

Those most likely to find selling a car a pain live in Belfast, Leicester and Bristol where at least 78 per cent of respondents admitted to disliking it.

So much so, a quarter would prefer to have a job interview instead! What’s more, a third would be happier organising a family holiday while over 15 per cent would rather do their accounts!

Maybe they should move down to Plymouth or up to Edinburgh where well over four in ten say they find selling a breeze.

Always a walk in the park?

There are a host of reasons why so many Brits find moving on their motor a hassle.

And it seems one of our major gripes is that the process can cause arguments, with around one in ten finding themselves rowing with a partner at some point (particularly in Liverpool, it seems).

Doing the paperwork afterwards is also a bit of a problem for around the same number, except in Leicester where  just 2.7 per cent of residents seem to mind.

Timewasters, the so-called ‘tyre kickers’ who come round with no intention of buying your car , are also frustrating according to 28.5 per cent of respondents who sold their car privately.

And when someone does make an offer, it can be insultingly low, say four in ten. Once again, Belfast suffers the most with a massive 53.7 per cent of people complaining about this.

However, some have far worse to put up with because four per cent of our 2,000 respondents had seen their car damaged during a test drive, that’s a massive 80 CARS!

A fair few silver linings…

But it’s not all doom and gloom, it seems selling your motor can be a great way to add some romance to your life.

So much so, one in ten of those surveyed knew someone who’d met a new love interest while doing so! And that rose to a massive 22 per cent of Londoners, so maybe singletons should move to the capital!

One respondent met their partner while selling a car 13 years ago and they now have a little three-year-old. Another’s friend sold his MG to the woman who’d later become his wife.

One woman admits going to a dealership right next to Liverpool Football Club’s training academy so she could see all the players turning up for training!

Selling your car can lead to some funny coincidences too. Many have realised they’re actually in talks to sell to a friend only when the potential buyer turns up to view the vehicle, with one pal even managing to write off his new buy just two days later!

Others have had a car break down or run out of petrol just yards from the dealership they’re selling it to while others have had a car fail to start when the buyer came to pick it up.

A change in attitude! 

Only a decade ago, selling online was a brave new world but now, selling cars entirely online is a great way to avoid a lot of the hassle and inconvenience usually associated with it.

When asked whether they think they’d be more likely to buy or sell a car online than they would have been five or ten years ago, a majority of respondents replied with a resounding ‘yes’.

Lorraine Fisher, Mail Online

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 29 August 2023

Planned redundancies rocket for 2023

The number of planned redundancies in the UK rocketed by 54% in the 12 months ending 31 July, according to new research.

Successive rises in interest rates have piled pressure on UK business’ cashflow, resulting in a leap of 83,382 planned job cuts, up to 237,017, in 2022/23 compared with 153,635 in 2021/22, according to analysis from employment law firm GQ Littler.

Since December 2021, the Bank of England has raised rates from 0.1% to 5.25%, making it significantly more expensive for businesses to service loans.

The high rate of wage growth, estimated by the Office for National Statistics as a 7.8% average increase between April and June 2023, has pushed business’ cash expenses even higher.

Some sectors have seen even higher pay growth, with pay packets for finance and business professionals growing 9.4% in the same period.

The double impact on business’ cashflow has seen many look to redundancies as a potential cost-cutting measure, according to Caroline Baker, partner at GQ Littler.

She told HR magazine: “The last year has seen a real change in confidence in the economy. 

“In particular, inflationary pressures and the UK looking like it might be dipping into recession have meant that companies are now looking carefully at their structures and seeing where they can make savings to keep them profitable, or at least afloat, through a tougher economic market. 

“The tech sector has had a particularly hard time, but we are now seeing companies making cuts across nearly all sectors.”

Any company looking at redundancies would be wise to plan carefully, Baker added.

She said: “From an HR perspective, the key starting point is how many redundancies are you looking at. 

“If you are planning 20 or more redundancies, then you will need to carry out a collective consultation exercise. 

“The key there is taking the time to properly plan the exercise and not rushing into it without first gathering all the information that the employee representatives need and will ask for.”

A well-planned collective consultation, she added, can be completed over two or three weeks.

As for the selection process, she said, it is important for HR leaders to push the business hard on their desired selection criteria and scores for employees in pools, to ensure they are justifiable.

“While businesses have a wide discretion on what selection criteria they use, HR’s role is to ensure that the criteria are as objective as possible and that there is no discriminatory element in any of the criteria.”

HR Magazine, Dominic Bernard

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 29 August 2023

Chat GPT may be banned in some UK organisations

Two thirds (66%) of organisations in the UK are implementing or considering bans on generative AI applications within the workplace, according to a survey of IT decision makers by software company Blackberry.

Most (69%) of these bans are long term or permanent, with 78% concerned that unsecured AI apps pose a cybersecurity threat.

Although 76% of IT decision makers agree that organisations have a right to control the applications that employees use for business purposes, 66% think that generative AI bans are too restrictive. 

AI is seen by IT decision makers as a way to increase efficiency (53%) and innovation (44%), and to enhance creativity (42%). 

Stephanie Coward, MD for human capital management at IRIS Software Group said banning AI should be a last resort.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “AI is here to stay, ChatGPT will just be the first of many, don’t be a Luddite.

 “This is all part of the normal technology change curve, so companies shouldn’t fear ChatGPT. Whilst it’s understandable why risks around security and privacy are making businesses hesitate, the potential benefits for job enrichment and business efficiency cannot be ignored.  

Coward said in order to regulate AI properly, businesses should set clear parameters, through a framework or code of conduct, for what AI should and shouldn’t be used for. 

However, they should avoid being too prescriptive or risk losing out on creativity.

She added: “Instead of out-right banning generative AI, the best approach is to identify potential use cases and set up pilots to do some proof of concepts to see if the hype is real. That way you can really understand the true risks and how they could be mitigated.

“It’s important to not be too stringent with how people use it; creating an internal ‘sandbox’ where people can freely test and experiment with AI in a controlled environment will be more productive in the long run. 

“Empowering your people with AI and other innovative tools will help them, and the business, quickly work out how they might be used on a day-to-day basis to, safely and securely.”  

The majority (68%) of business leaders think employees should not use AI without a managers’ permission, according to a separate study from technology authority Tech.co last month (July 2023)

Shishir Singh, chief technology officer at BlackBerry, said business should shape policies around AI as the technology develops.

He said: “Banning generative AI applications in the workplace can mean a wealth of potential business benefits are quashed.

“As platforms mature and regulations take effect, flexibility could be introduced into organisational policies. The key will be in having the right tools in place for visibility, monitoring and management of applications used in the workplace.”

Blackberry’s research was conducted in June and July 2023, surveying 2000 IT decision makers globally.

HR Magazine, Millicent Machell

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 29 August 2023

UK lags behind US on AI adoption at work

UK office workers are lagging behind their American counterparts when it comes to adopting AI in the workplace, research has revealed.

Nearly half (46%) of US office workers now use AI at least once weekly in their roles, compared with just 29% in the UK, according to research by software company Asana’s Work Innovation Lab.

In June, prime minister Rishi Sunak declared his intention to make the UK the home of AI safety, pledging to make London the next Silicon Valley, but it seems British workers are less confident about the technology.

Nearly a third (30%) of Brits said they thought they would be seen as lazy if they used AI at work, compared with just 20% of American workers.

British workers’ reluctance to US AI was shared by leaders too, as companies in the US were nearly twice as likely to offer their employees training on AI.

More than a fifth (22%) of the American companies polled offered training with AI tools, compared with 13% of those in the UK.

Angelina Gentili, head of people operations, at Personio said HR leaders have a duty to help employees transition to a future with more AI in work, including providing the right training.

Speaking to HR magazine, Gentili said: “As a first priority, HR must communicate about how AI will be used in the workplace to help improve confidence and transparency and to create a platform for employees to raise any concerns they may have. 

“Next, it’s important for HR to support business leaders in identifying the areas that could benefit from AI and digitalisation to help streamline inefficiencies.”

Policies around data and privacy will be vital in this process, she added, and businesses should evaluate their stance on how AI tools are used. 

“We are moving into a new phase of AI’s role in our workplaces,” said Saket Srivastava, chief information officer at Asana. 

“However, there are clear obstacles, with some employees harbouring concerns about how their AI use could be perceived by peers and managers. 

“Employees can’t navigate this AI shift alone. They need clear guidelines to understand AI’s role in their functions, along with tailored training and accessible technologies to fully harness AI’s capabilities. 

“Organisations that get this right will leverage AI in a way that unlocks new levels of human ingenuity.” 

Asana’s The State of AI at Work report is based on the views of over 4,546 workers in the US and UK, with more than 2,000 in the UK.

The survey for the report was undertaken in July 2023.

HR Magazine, Dominic Bernard

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 2 March 2023

How to decide between job offers

Feelings about what is left behind and fears about what may lie ahead can stifle life and career choices. When it is time to shift and decide which job offer is best, career coach Kelli Thompson recommends five steps: Remember what moved you in a job you loved, be practical and pragmatic about the job you are chasing, reflect on your values to determine what you want, listen to your gut and look at the overall picture. And those rattling emotions that come with deciding on a new job? They’re not exclusively bad. Thompson says it’s OK “to be scared-cited.”

5 steps to use your head, heart, and gut for career direction

Career pivots often cause anxiety and nerves, deterring individuals from even trying. Yet, according to the 2022 Women In The Workplace report, women are leaving organizations in record numbers to gain more flexibility, to be rewarded more equitably for their efforts, to find a better culture, and to earn advancement opportunities. But there’s one concern I hear, as a career coach, over and over: How do I know if I’ve found the right company?

I coach my clients to use their head, heart, and gut during their decision-making process using the same 5-step process I used when deciding to cut my own interviewing process short.

Step 1: Reflect on how you felt in a job you loved

Look back at career moments where you felt the most productive and engaged in your work:

  • What helped you feel engaged?
  • What did you love most about the work itself?
  • The people you worked with?
  • The environment and company culture?

Step 2: Use your head to assess the job you’re going for

Grab a piece of paper and jot down facts about the role you are applying for:

  • What kind of work will you be doing?
  • How is the work different from what you’ve been doing? What excites you about that? What makes you nervous?
  • Is it the kind of work you want to do?
  • What is the salary? The benefits? Additional rewards and recognition?
  • Who will you be working with? What do you know about your coworkers and team?
  • What do you know about your new leader?

Step 3: Drop into your heart to determine what you want

I recommend treating this as a meditative exercise. Sit down, close your eyes, and think about these questions:

  • What do you want your life or work to stand for? What do you want to be known for as a person and a leader?
  • What values are important to you in a career?
  • What values does the organization hold that match yours? How do you know?
  • How did you feel after each interaction? What emotions come up?

Step 4: Listen to your gut

This is the intuitive feeling that comes up when you think about the job, the company, or the team you’ll be working with:

  • How does your energy feel when interacting with the people you’d be working with?
  • When you’re in the building? (if not virtual)
  • Given what you know about yourself and this role, what action does your gut say to take?

Step 5: Look at the overall picture

Use this exercise to identify conflicting feelings or to confirm your decision:

  • How will this company and role align with your values and talents?
  • What aspects of the role will contribute to you experiencing career fulfillment?
  • Do you feel energized and fuzzy about this opportunity? Or tense and anxious? What do those feelings tell you?
  • How can you get any lingering questions answered?
  • Are your head, heart, and gut aligned?

Deciding to accept or decline the job offer

If your choice raises feelings of dread or heaviness in your body, slow down and check in to make sure you’re making the right choice and the allure of a certain title or salary offer isn’t overcoming you. Ideally, we choose a company or role that makes us feel peaceful and in a state of flow. Of course, new work or promotion may bring nervousness or doubt, but we can balance that by acknowledging our excitement, making it ok to be scared-cited.

Quartz, Kelli Thompson

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 2 March 2023

Don’t use colour on your resume, unless they’re ‘hiring you for your creativity’

When writing a resume, there are multiple expert tips to consider. Make sure to mirror the language in the job description if it’s relevant to your experience. Use impactful verbs in describing what you did in each job. Quantify your accomplishments with impressive numbers.

That’s all fairly straightforward. But when it comes to trying to make an impression, should you consider adding elements to your resume that make you stand out even more?

For instance, while the standard resume is written in black font, should you consider colours like green or purple as well?

‘Nobody really wants a creative accountant’

When it comes to a colourful font, experts agree it really depends on the industry you’re in.

“If you’re an accountant or an IT person, nobody really wants a creative accountant,” says Julie Bauke, founder and chief career strategist with The Bauke Group.

That likely goes for other industries, too, like finance and medicine. Keep it to Arial, Times New Roman or Calibri, 11-point, black font on a white or cream-coloured resume.

However, when you are in a field “that they’re hiring you for your creativity,” says Bauke, like graphic design or animation, “you’ve got more room to play with.”

If you’re in one of these fields, when you’re applying for your next position, ask yourself, are you applying for jobs in which your resume could be an extension of the artistic voice you’re trying to convey? If so, what would best help to convey it?

Keep in mind: “It’s important to consider legibility, and bright colours can be hard to read,” says Octavia Goredema, career coach and author of “Prep, Push, Pivot.”

If you’ve chosen a colour other than black, try printing out your resume to see if it’s legible before using it.

Colour ‘is not going to make any difference in your skills’

If you do add a bit of colour, just remember to keep the rest of the resume clean and stick to a traditional format.

“If you’ve got boxes here and different colours here and arrows going here, and you’re trying to be all cute, then I’m all confused,” says Bauke. “You want to make sure that it’s straightforward, that people can understand what you’ve done and what you’re looking for.”

“If you are in doubt about the design you have chosen,” says Goredema, “ask someone more senior than you within your industry, ideally someone who makes hiring decisions, to review your resume format.”

Plus, and most importantly, “a blue font or black font is not going to make any difference if your skills and expertise and accomplishments are not relevant to the role that you’re applying for,” says Goredema.

So make sure you’re including the relevant experience and impactful bullet points that prove this employer should consider hiring you regardless of purple font, squiggly underlines, or any another quirky design element.

CNBC, Gili Malinsky

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 2 March 2023

Knowing when to step down as a leader

Jacinda Arden has announced she is stepping down as prime minister of New Zealand, leaving us with powerful words on leadership: “I hope I leave behind a belief that you can be kind but strong, empathetic but decisive, optimistic but focused… that you can be your own kind of leader, one who knows when it’s time to go.”

She has led New Zealand through the Covid-19 pandemic and a strong economic recovery during her tenure.

She has also laid a solid foundation for the country’s future, giving whoever takes over a good chance of success and makes room for a new generation of leaders to rise through the ranks.

Arden stepping down raises a big question though: how do you know when it is the right time to step down as a leader? This comes down to looking past the leader, to see if the team behind them is ready to take up the mantle.

Leaders achieve the majority of their impact by connecting and engaging with others in pursuit of a clear and compelling purpose.

To accomplish this effectively, the leader must have a positive influence on those they lead. When she first entered politics, Ardern had specific values and goals in mind, such as combating child poverty.

These objectives provided her with more clarity and reassurance. Effective leaders instil a sense of security in their teams.

The more information and inspiration a leader can provide their team, the more secure those people will feel and the more capable they will be to use their initiative and make good decisions.

There is a real imperative for leaders who want to build and maintain a positive culture to work hard to inspire and be understood.

Giving people clarity and reassurance about who you are and how you work creates safety and has a positive impact. The better people know and understand you as a leader, the more freedom you will be able to give them and the more initiative they will be able to take.

Allowing people to take initiative contributes to the development of a new generation of leaders. This is exactly what happens in high-performing organisations: leadership flows around and throughout.

Ardern created New Zealand’s most diverse cabinet ever, creating a new generation of leaders.

By creating a team who are motivated and guided by that magically clear and compelling purpose, the result is a creative and exciting culture in which team members are free to harness the energy of others to generate useful activity.

When a leader has a built a legacy and feels that they are no longer able to energise their team and inspire them to help push forward towards that long term goal, it is time to pass on the baton before the momentum they have created is lost.

Though she is stepping down, Ardern can do so with the confidence that she is leaving a solid foundation and a team that will continue to push forward with the purpose that she has instilled in them.

HR Magazine, Neil Jurd

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 2 March 2023

Using a Diversity Dictionary to overcome fear of saying the wrong thing

The benefits of a business with people from different backgrounds are clear. Not only does it bring diversity of thought and allow people to learn from different experiences, but it can also help attract a bigger pool of talent, too.

While the benefits may be well-understood, it’s clear that many businesses are still struggling to create an inclusive environment.

One of the biggest barriers to inclusivity is a lack of confidence and understanding when discussing topics of diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) in the workplace. 

In fact, more than half (55%) of respondents in a 2021 survey claimed that they are scared to say the “wrong thing” when discussing issues in these areas.

In the absence of real understanding of these topics, people are opting to steer clear of the subject entirely, which can be more damaging in the long-term.

There’s no perfect formula, but as a minimum business leaders need to be listening to employees to better understand how they can be more inclusive, and then create a DE&I strategy that is reflective of those needs.

At Suntory Beverage & Food GB&I we recognise the importance of putting practises in place that can help encourage meaningful conversations.

One of our latest steps to do so has been the creation of a Diversity Dictionary, a new resource for everybody across our European business that includes a glossary of key terms relating to DE&I and our commitments in these areas.

The dictionary which we offer free on our website to everybody focuses on five key topics, aligned to our DE&I pillars: women in leadership, race and ethnicity, LGBTQ+, age and disability.

It aims to help people feel comfortable having conversations on issues in these areas and provides them with a tool that they can regularly refer to and learn from.

Our entire executive committee strongly believes that we need to create an environment where, whatever your background, if you have the potential, you are given the opportunities at work to realise this.

This is part of what we call our Growing for Good vision, a commitment to positive change inside and outside of our business.

We believe we can only Grow for Good if we have a diverse and equitable workplace and an inclusive working culture, where everyone is welcome, treated fairly, made part of our community and given the chance to thrive.

We know there is still more work for us to do, but we are proud of the steps we continue to take to improve.  We know that by promoting diversity in our employee base, as well as embracing diverse values and ideas, we can bring forth even greater value to our business and society.

The last two years have been like no other for society. However, by creating an inclusive company culture that responds directly to changing people’s needs, businesses have the opportunity to attract and retain a much happier and healthier workforce, and in turn, fuel innovation and business growth.

HR Magazine Jola Brooking

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 9 December 2022

Employee experience better incentive than bonuses

Organisations such as Barclays, Lloyds Group, Virgin Money and British Airways have offered their staff one-off bonus payments to help with soaring living costs, yet bonuses might not be a quick fix for companies to incentivise their workers.

Jill Cotton, career trends expert at Glassdoor, said improving the employee experience would be more effective at retaining staff than money.

Speaking to HR magazine, she said: “A one-size-fits-all solution for wooing and retaining candidates does not meet the complex needs of the modern workforce. In the current fierce battle for talent, we are increasingly seeing companies offer a wider range of benefits and incentives to stand apart from the competition.

“While being paid a bonus may be attractive to some job seekers, others will be looking for a great work/life balance or close alignment with their core values.

“The key is for companies to lean into the employee experience to understand what really matters to workers. Bonuses are motivational but if there’s no history of paying out, the benefit becomes defunct.”

Nosa Omoigui, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 9 December 2022

Exit interview insights are going to waste

Your organisation is leaking top talent assets through exit interviews.

Let’s assume your organisation doesn’t have exit interviews in place; the companies wouldn’t do much with the insights even if they were, and that no one senior cares either way. These assumptions are all too valid, as they are the reality I see in many of the organisations I work with. So, in short: what a waste.

Earlier this year I was with a client when a senior manager sent around his resignation email. It was a total shock. He was a loved leader and people seemed genuinely upset that he was leaving to go to a competitor.

What shocked me wasn’t his departure but the fact that the organisation had probably invested north of a few million pounds in his package over his five-year tenure, plus the small fortune invested in his executive education programme. He also had deep insights into the company culture and, perhaps more importantly, deep ties to many of its most valued customers. The company had spent five years building a knowledge ‘asset’ that was the reason the competition valued this leader so much.

How much value did this organisation truly place on this knowledge base? Not much. Global teams were sent a very nice email, social media posts had some good likes and a few re-shares, people discussed over lunch about what a loss it was and a cunning few started to position themselves for a well-earned (and well waited for) promotion.

Staff learnt the boss had resigned, customers learnt that they’d ‘gone on to new challenges’ and social media learnt about their wonderful journey. But the organisation had learnt, well, pretty much nothing. The way that the company’s most valuable customers liked to be engaged with? Lost, gone. The best way to deliver that all important quarterly strategic update, painstakingly honed over the previous 20 quarters? Gone, and much more besides.

This waste is indeed hazardous. It’s a hazard and a cost that I think investors should pay more attention to as this leaky knowledge bucket costs hard money. If I was investing in a business that operated this way, then I’d have serious concerns.

So, let’s start with the exit interview data, this is so easy to get and act on. The benefit is of benefit to everyone: the organisation, the culture, the customer, the shareholder, and in many cases, if the organisation is engaged in the pursuit of societal impact, society too.

I’m a fan of data so I polled 116 leaders on LinkedIn and asked “Should organisations do more with exit interview insights?” 97% of people said… yes. The people have spoken.

Wayne Clarke, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 9 December 2022

Employee experience trends for 2023

While it’s difficult to predict any specific event, one thing we can predict is that through 2023 and beyond, business and employees will face ongoing disruption.

It’s well documented that disruption impacts employees and business performance. Yet, while disruption creates certain challenges, many organisations are able to thrive.

WTW research, spanning a decade, found key trends as to why some companies thrive in the face of adversity, by comparing employee experiences for a group of organisations that are highly effective at change and transformation (employee experience change masters) with a group of organisations that were undergoing significant negative disruption (disrupted organisations).

What’s the key to success?

There are three key elements that shape how certain organisations are able to thrive during times of disruption: being adaptable, having positive leaders and having superior financial results.

Employee experience (EX) change masters are experts at change. They navigate global dynamics far better than most organisations.

They anticipate market needs better, get the pace of change right in employees’ eyes, and instil confidence that things are changing for the better.

EX change masters have a unique DNA. When compared with disrupted organisations, EX change masters have leaders who create an experience that is inspiring, future-focused and market shaping.

They are highly organised, set the tone and empower employees. They instil trust, are respectful, care for employee wellbeing, and provide fair and equitable rewards.

EX change masters return superior financial performance. In a three-year period, EX change masters achieved 264% greater revenue growth, 33% greater return on equity, 20% greater return on assets and 68% greater return on capital.

How to future-proof your organisation for 2023

Take a systematic approach to future-proofing your EX. Becoming an EX change master requires systematic fine-tuning of employee experience, so that it remains resilient in times of disruption.

This is achieved through an agile and ongoing listening strategy that provides an understanding of the sources of stress. The organisations that are effective at handling change and transformation will then address those stressors.

Labour costs often constitute one of the biggest annual investments that companies make. In an increasingly competitive and disruptive world, attracting, retaining and engaging talent will require optimal allocation of this investment by understanding what employees need and value. Without a robust and systematic approach to employee listening, companies run the risk of misspending.

Take targeted actions to become an EX change master.

Emulating the actions that differentiate today’s EX change masters is the first step toward becoming an EX change master. From the analysis, there are 15 actions which EX change masters excel at most.

  • Prioritise wellbeing
  • Promote non-financial recognition
  • Ensure fair and equitable pay
  • Provide resources for people to manage careers
  • Recruit top talent pro-actively
  • Promote only the most competent
  • Ensure vision is clear for all employees
  • Construct a well-formulated mission and strategy
  • Empower and distribute decision-making
  • Ensure operational and staffing excellence
  • Shape the market, anticipate new products
  • Move quickly from idea to implementation
  • Encourage the best in people
  • Encourage people to challenge tradition

Thriving through uncertainty is attainable

Disruption is far from over, and employers need to prepare in order to adapt and survive. Ongoing disruptions will significantly impact employees at work and at home, essentially turning business models on their heads.

Resilient and future-proof organisations will be able to ride the shocks and thrive, if they have made preparations for change. But the organisations that don’t prepare, will be setting themselves up for failure.

Gaby Joyner Stephen Young, HR Magazine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 9 December 2022

12 Terrible Interview Behaviours that Could be Sabotaging your Hiring Process…

The internet is absolutely jam-packed full of guidance on how not to botch a job interview, as a candidate.

However, other than the many articles illuminating the “top interview questions to ask,” there is actually little written about how hiring managers could be sabotaging their own recruitment process (and how to fix that).

Like we always say, recruitment is a two-way street and it’s absolutely critical that interviewers are on top form, as well as their interviewees.

For instance, how can you expect to hire a rising star, if your interview technique leaves them feeling cynical, bemused and even uncomfortable?

Below, we’ve highlighted 12 of the most common behavioural mistakes that hiring managers make and how to combat them in the future to ensure that you’re attracting the right staff for your business.

1. Spontaneity (or lack of preparation)?

Some hiring managers prefer a more “spontaneous” method of interviewing.

They’ll use a more conversational tone to suss out the candidate’s knowledge and skills, as well as their natural personality and attitude.

This is all well and good for experienced interviewers who can improvise and quite naturally wing their way through a variety of questions, giving the appearance of expertise and experience.

However, there is nothing worse than an interviewer who is clearly not prepared.

Appearing nervous (see below), letting candidates take control and being in complete ignorance of the candidate’s CV, cover letter and experience will give an incredibly bad impression of the business and could even unnerve the candidate, who is left grasping to answer un-asked questions.

So if you identify with any of the above, all you have to do is prepare in advance, it really is that simple.

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Prior to interview, identify the key skills and competencies that the perfect candidate will possess. Create a checklist and tick off each point when a candidate evidences it.
  • Come up with a list of questions you’d like to ask (see our 6 essential interview questions for some more ideas).
  • Research questions that the candidate may ask you and consider how you will answer them (we recently highlighted some interesting questions they could use to impress you).

2. Anxiety.

Every hiring manager will have to face their first interview at some point and are bound to be a little anxious.

The problem is that nerves, if not kept under control, can easily filter into the entire interview and could even be transferred to the (already pressured) candidate.

Obviously, you’re not going to get the best out of a candidate when you’re both stuttering and trembling!

Just prepare yourself (see above) keep calm and carry on!

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Practice your interviewing skills. You could ask a colleague to give you a hand, or even a friend or family member outside of work.
  • Take back-up. If you are nervous, it might be worth shadowing an experienced manager (or getting them to shadow you) before going it alone.
  • Start with an ice-breaker, to ease into the interview in a friendlier way.
  • Sit up straight and try not to fidget. These are tell-tale signs that you’re feeling nervous!

3. Indifference.

Being relaxed in an interview is definitely a positive thing; coming across nonchalant and uninterested definitely isn’t!

I once attended an interview with two managers, one who seemed very experienced and another who (put generously) did not.

Throughout the entire interview, the inexperienced interviewer didn’t say a word, but continued to doodle across my CV. By the end of the interview, my CV had been transformed into a beautiful and enchanted forest with trees, flowers and pathways.

As you can imagine, I was both distracted and completely put out by the experience.  Make sure that any candidates you interview feel engaged with you as a person, and consequently with the business.

Don’t let any indifference destroy your hopes of recruiting the perfect person.

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Ask follow up questions and sound genuinely interested in the candidate (without cutting them off).
  • Don’t doodle, yawn or seem too overly relaxed (swinging on your chair, tapping your thumbs).
  • Never get distracted by other tasks and people (or by the telephone).

4. Inappropriateness.

You must never ever ask questions or make comments that could even remotely be perceived as discriminatory.

No matter how much you get on with a candidate, such topics could easily offend and have serious legal implications (not to mention the damage it could have on your company’s reputation).

We’ve heard all sorts of inappropriate interview horror stories, from sexist jokes and outwardly sexual comments, to badly-masked questions like ‘What are your plans for your personal life in the next five years?’

So, maintain your professionalism at all times regardless of how relaxed you feel with the candidate.

Recruiter Top Tips:

Do NOT attempt to discuss any of the following:

  • Age discrimination.
  • Sexual orientation.
  • Marital status.
  • Cultural issues.
  • Disabilities and illness.
  • Previous criminal convictions.
  • Inappropriate jokes,innuendos and anecdotes.

For the full rundown of what not to discuss during an interview, check out our previous blog “6 interview question topics employers should avoid“.

5. Overzealousness.

You’ll never be able to suss out whether someone is right for the job and your business, if you spend the entirety of the interview waffling (or even worse, droning on).

You simply won’t be able to draw the right information from your candidate, you’ll come across as just a little bit over-excited (or even desperate) and you might even put them off accepting the potential job offer!

So, ask a question (hopefully a well prepared one), sit back and listen to the answer, and I mean properly listen to it.

Make sure you ask plenty of situational questions (who, how, why, what, where, when) and let them demonstrate how invaluable they would be to your business.

Recruiter Top Tips:

When you feel like you’ve been talking for longer than your candidate…

  • Stop and give them a chance to speak!
  • Re-visit the list of questions you came up with prior to the interview and ask the candidate something relevant (giving them plenty of time to reply).
  • Make an effort to get them involved in the conversation. ‘How does that sound to you?’ ‘Is that what you expected?’

6. Too Quiet.

In most interviews, you’ll want your candidate to do most of the talking…but a two-sided (and natural) conversation is much more likely to draw the best of your candidates.

If you remain very quiet and just rattle off a couple of questions once in a while, it’ll be difficult for you to get all of the information you need and it will also give off an uninterested vibe to your candidate.

Being more friendly and conversational will put your candidates at ease, giving them more of a chance to impress you.

Recruiter Pro Tips:

  • Be polite and ask follow up questions to keep the conversation going.
  • If you need to dig further do so in a friendly way; ‘it sounds like you know where you’d like to be in life, but why choose marketing in particular?”
  • If there is an awkward silence at any point, fill it. Ask your next question!

It’s also worth remembering that to a certain extent, your company is on trial too.  If you’re rude, offensive or even aggressive, the candidate is bound to tell others, especially with review sites like Glassdoor readily available and steadily gaining more popularity.

A prolonged silence can appear hostile…

7. Intimidation.

I’m not talking about being physically aggressive towards your candidates when I talk about and condemn ‘aggressive interviewing techniques’ (this is just quite clearly a huge no-no).

I’m actually talking about those (of which there are more than a few) who use the interview process to test how well candidates ‘cope with pressure’.

Unfortunately, there’s a very thin line between throwing a few left-field questions to a candidate and scaring the living daylights out of them.

The latter will not only fail to give you an accurate impression of your candidate, but will also, more than likely scare them away from your job anyway.

Intimidation through silence

After clearly having finished their answer to a question, the intimidating culprits will remain completely silent, as if waiting for more information.

The awkwardness that ensues will agitate even the most confident of candidates and many will end up waffling and revealing a lot more about themselves than they perhaps would have done.

Recruiter Top Tips

  • Intimidating candidates will merely make them more nervous and negatively affect their performance (and thus your opinion of them!)
  • Never be rude to your candidates.
  • Never show anger and frustration.

Having been on the receiving end of this tactic, I can attest that (unless handled appropriately) it often comes across as rude, leaving candidates feeling just a little bit silly!

8. Unfair.

In the same vein, it’s really important not to unfairly expect too much from your candidates!

Some hiring managers (often when recruiting for technical roles) will purposely ask a question they don’t expect the job candidate to know (something beyond their experience) to see whether they try and blag it under the pressure.

This technique, again, will simply make your candidate uncomfortable, possibly stopping them from showing their true capabilities.

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Make a real effort to ease your candidate into the interview before bombarding them with difficult questions.
  • Stress interviews won’t work for your nervous, shy or confidence-lacking candidates (but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re not right for the job!)

9. (Too) Kind!

Of course, that doesn’t mean that you should be too easy on your candidates either.

You should expect that each and every one of your interviewees will be prepared when they enter the room and (if they’ve done their research) they’ll already have a pretty good idea of standard interview questions and how they’re going to answer them.

It’s really important to come up with some fresh and more challenging questions as well as the clichés like ‘what’s your greatest weakness?

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Investigate some of the most cliché interview questions (online) and simply don’t ask them.
  • If you must use them, then make sure you include a few more difficult and creative ones too!
  • Try not to be too structured. A great candidate will be able to improvise and have a natural conversation with you, so give them a chance to do just that.

To get your hands on some more creative interview questions (that aren’t too kind) check out our 10 interview questions to ask when recruiting blog!

10. Over-Friendliness.

Often, inexperienced interviewers will (subconsciously) attempt to make a connection with their candidate, bonding over shared negative experiences, gripes and frustrations.

Just don’t.

Saying anything negative about your role, colleagues, manager, the business or industry, is bound to leave your candidate feeling a little uncertain (even if they can relate to your experience).

This may sound really obvious, but it’s still one of the most common (and most easily avoidable) mistakes that interviewers make.

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Don’t mention personal or professional problems and issues.
  • Never badmouth your manager, the business owner, colleagues, ex-colleagues or competitors.
  • You should be wary of any candidate who badmouths their previous employer.

11. Dishonesty.

Before offering someone a job, you’ll want to know everything you can about them but remember, before accepting any job offer, the candidate will want to know everything they can about it too!

A serious and committed interviewee will show up with a list of questions they’d already like to ask (and will also be able to improvise and come up with new ones as the conversation progresses).

It is pretty imperative that you’re prepared to answer most (if not all) of those questions.  If a candidate has any doubts that you don’t manage to confront and quell, then they’re much more likely to reject your offer.

“Better the devil you know…” and all that jazz.

It’s also really important to not lie in an interview.  Don’t make things up simply to get someone to accept any job you offer them, it will almost certainly bite you on the backside at a later date.  Be as honest as you possibly can and you’ll leave a very positive impression in the candidate’s eyes.

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Always ask the candidate ‘do you have any questions’? at some point in the interview (usually the end).
  • Take relevant moments throughout the interview to bring up the company, explaining how things do (and don’t) work.
  • You could show the candidate around your office, introducing them to their potential line manager and colleagues.
  • Be honest.  There really isn’t any point taking someone on if they have an unreliable view of the business.

12. Bias.

Human beings have a whole set of cognitive biases that fuel our decisions.

If you interview someone that you personally get on very well with, then you’re likely to feel a strong bias in their favour.

This of course means that your next interviewee will find it much harder to impress you so to find the best person for the job, you’ll need to quell the bias as much as humanly possible.

Recruiter Top Tips:

  • Go in with a clear and open mind.  This next candidate really could be better than the last!
  • Try not to run interviews one after the other, in swift succession. The chances are that your brain will still be focusing on the previous candidate.
  • It’s always a great idea to host a panel interview, especially in the later stages of recruitment. Differing personalities will pick up on different positives and negatives and you’ll be able to work together to suss out the best candidate, without unwittingly giving in to a personal bias.

Summary.

After putting together your job ads, trawling through CVs and cover letters and finally shortlisting your favourite applicants, it can seem like the hard part of your recruitment process is over, but unfortunately there’s still one major hurdle to overcome; the interview!

In order to attract the most ambitious, talented and proactive candidates, you’re going to have to truly sell the business and the role both prior to the interview and during!

Also, don’t forget, if applicants have a particularly bad interview experience, they’re likely to tell others and it could reflect badly on your business.

James Ball, Coburgbanks

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2022

Most popular work perks revealed

Overtime pay has pipped a four-day week, flexible working and remote work as the most popular workplace benefit.

According to a survey of the top 10 employee benefits by HR service company Remote, a majority (79%) of UK employees would like overtime, making it the most popular work perk.

At 77% flexible working hours and company-funded retirement plans rounded out the top three.

Early finishes on Friday (65%), a four-day working week (64%) and miscarriage leave (62%) ranked at fourth, fifth and seventh on the list.

They were followed by paid self-care days (61%), online training and coaching (61%), private health insurance (58%) and a remote work from anywhere policy (58%).

Claire Neal, head of workplace mental health at Mental Health UK, said businesses should aim to reach a point where workers don’t need to take a specific day for self-care.

She told HR magazine: “Ultimately, employers should aim to make mental health such a priority in their organisation that self-care, or recovery days, aren’t necessary. The risk is that self-care days give employees a brief and fleeting respite, but not enough is done to prioritise wellbeing and prevent stress and burnout during normal working hours.

“It might also normalise the idea that you must reach a state of burnout before you ‘deserve’ some time to focus on your own wellbeing. This is an unhealthy mindset to encourage.

“Organisations should focus on how they can support these employees to ensure they are able to get the necessary rest and recuperation they need, exploring any adjustments they can make to their schedule to support their wellbeing.”

Steve Herbert, wellbeing and benefits director at Partners&, said the pandemic has helped these wellbeing-based perks become more popular.

He told HR magazine: “Flexible working, early finishes on a Friday, four-day working weeks, paid self-care days, and remote working from anywhere have all been mooted in recent years and have become far more mainstream since the enforced lived experiences of the pandemic lockdowns.

“All these concepts essentially require the employer to trust its workforce to deliver on their KPIs, while also given them the autonomy to better balance their home life, family commitments, and importantly self-care too.”

The research also showed a generational split regarding which benefits are prioritised.

Globally, attending in person events was important for 57% of gen Z workers, while retirement plans were a priority for 80% of baby boomers.

Herbert added that employers would be wise to pay attention to which benefits are most popular among their workers.

“UK employers should take note of this trend. Despite looming recession, UK unemployment levels are at historic lows, and this means meeting candidate and employee expectations takes on a new importance.

“Employers need to attract and retain the very best talent while also maximising the productivity of each and every one. Employers will only be able to achieve this if their wider employment offering matches the expectations of workers.”

Remote’s UK results were based on the opinions of 2,000 employees and global results are based on the opinions of 10,000 people across the US, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK.

HR Magazine, Nosa Omoigui

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2022

Why the four-day week won’t work

Over 3,300 employees from 70 different companies are currently participating in a UK trial of a four-day working week. There is, however, divided opinion as to whether a four-day working week will lead to a better work/life balance for employees, whilst at the same time making companies more efficient and profitable.

The benefits of a shorter working week can include improved wellbeing, better focus, fairer sharing of childcare between men and women, and a lighter carbon footprint.

For example, Microsoft trialled a four-day week in its Japanese offices and found the shortened work week led to more efficient meetings, happier workers and a 40% boost in productivity.

It also led to a reduction in electricity use in the building, less staff absences and fewer pages of paper printed.

According to mental health charity Mind, one in six people report experiencing a common mental health problem in any given week in England, and one in five agreed that they have called in sick to avoid work so they do not have to admit to feeling mentally unwell.

A four-day week could counteract cases of mental health in the workplace.

To the contrary, if employers seek to hit the same performance targets as before but in less time, staff may be forced to work four 10-hour days, rush jobs that require more time, or require the company to hire additional employees to plug gaps.

The benefits of offering workers more free time will quickly disappear. Employees may become burnt out due to the increasing pressure of getting more done in less time. Diaries will become congested as a shorter week implies greater intensity.

National lockdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic exposed the gap between flexible homeworking professionals and frontline staff (such as doctors, nurses and police officers, as well as hospitality and retail staff who cannot work flexibly).

A four-day week might widen this gap and cause greater employee shortages in these industries. Another factor to consider is that not everyone can afford to work four days a week, particularly those who are paid on an hourly basis rather than a salaried basis.

The proposals will mean that staff who are paid hourly will need to work extra hours in a more condensed period to earn the same amount as before and as such, the proposal risks creating a two-tier workforce.

Furthermore, a four-day week model does not suit all employers. Many employers will be unable to adapt their entire business to a new way of working.

The four-day week model could cause employers issues relating to holiday entitlement, may require a need for employers to vary contracts of employment and it may lead to issues with part-time employees.

If employers switch to a four-day week and keep the standard 37.5 to 40 hour working week, holiday allowances will not change.

However, if an employer reduces the number of hours and/or days its employees work each week, they will need to re-calculate the holiday employees are entitled to.

Holiday entitlement has been addressed by the 4-day Week Campaign, which suggests that holiday allowances would need to be reduced in line with the overall reduction in working hours.

For those who currently work five-days a week, this would mean a 20% reduction in their holiday allowance.

Varying an employee’s contractual terms and conditions can only be done by mutual agreement. It is likely that employers considering the four-day week will trial the changes before moving to a permanent four-day week arrangement. In such circumstances, employers will need to be clear that the initial contractual change is temporary and at the end of the trial, the employees’ hours will revert to normal unless otherwise confirmed in writing.

Employers will need to be careful not to allow a trial to continue longer than originally agreed, as this may inadvertently create a contractual entitlement to a four-day week.

With regard to part-time employees, many will already work four days a week, with their pay adjusted to reflect their working days (i.e. 80% of full salary).

On the basis that the four-day week involves a reduction of days worked but no reduction in pay, part-time employees may request a reduction in their work week from four days to three days with no change to their pay or seek an increase in their pay to match their full-time colleagues.

Employers may find this difficult to manage, particularly if this results in reduced workforce availability.

The results of the four-day week pilot will be keenly considered by those both in favour of and against the idea of changing our typical work patterns.

Prior to the pandemic, hybrid working was unthinkable to most but has now become the norm for many. It could very well be that the four-day working week becomes a reality in as much as hybrid working patterns have.

HR Magazine, Susan Thompson

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2022

The 10 most common misspellings on CVs

The 10 most common misspellings on CVs, including ‘experienced’ and ‘successful’, and the 10 overused words to avoid

  • Getting your CV right is key to finding a job but spelling is letting people down
  • Many employers will chuck a CV in the bin if there are misspellings on it
  • ‘Focused’ and ‘professional’ were some of the most common misspellings

Getting your CV right is key ways to finding a job but many people are failing at the first hurdle by misspelling words on their résumé.

Language skills are critical to any CV and it can often be the difference between getting hired and your paperwork falling to the bottom of the pile.

In a mission to help job hunters improve the language used on their résumés, language learning app Preply has analysed Indeed’s UK CV database to reveal the most misspelled words. 

Preply’s research revealed the top 15 words job hunters have the most difficulty spelling on their CVs when describing themselves and their achievements or responsibilities. 

According to Preply’s research, ‘experienced’ was the word causing the most problems for job seekers writing their CVs in English.

‘Successful’, ‘counselled’ and ‘succeeded’ also proved difficult for candidates due to their repeated letters.

Words with American to English variations such as ‘behaviour’ and ‘judgement’ also proved confusing.

The online language learning platform also created a seed list of more than 150 English words and phrases commonly used by job hunters in their applications.

Each word from the list was searched on Indeed’s CV finder to discover the number of résumés updated or submitted this year where it had been featured.

Alongside this the language learning app analysed Google Search volumes to find out which of the 150 words job hunters have the most difficulty spelling to help raise awareness of common mistakes to avoid.

It found that ‘skilled’ was the most commonly used word on CVs in the last six months and was on 2.18 million résumés.

‘Responsible’ and ‘trained’ follow in second and third place on the list, being included in 1.30 million and 1.28 million CVs respectively in the last six months.

Job hunters are also keen to show their personable side, with references to ‘social’ and ‘friendly’ traits featuring on 617,000 and 446,000 CVs respectively.

Despite not ranking among the top 20, more than 73,000 candidates included the description of ‘fun’ and at least 20,000 job hunters wrote about having a ‘good sense of humour’ on their CV in the last six months.

Don’t be a cliché! 10 most overused words 

  1. Skilled 
  2. Responsible 
  3. Trained 
  4. Organised 
  5. Educated 
  6. Informed 
  7. Motivated 
  8. Social 
  9. Confident 
  10. Adaptable

Want to improve YOUR CV? Expert shares their six top tips

  • Start your sentences with action verbs

 Front-load your sentences so the most important piece of information is at the start and is introduced using a dynamic verb. For example, ‘answered customer complaints’ might become ‘managed customer complaints’.

  • Omit personal pronouns

Avoid the use of ‘I’ and ‘we’ to make your résumé sound more scientific and factual. For example, ‘I lectured every week to a cohort’ might become ‘Lectured weekly to a 30-strong student cohort’.

  • Use the language of the job description

Adapt your résumé for every job role and try to incorporate specific words and phrases from the job advertisement you are applying for the best chance of success.

  • Give specific evidence of your skills and achievements

To back up your claims give clear, specific, and relevant evidence. Where possible try to quantify achievements. For example, change ‘Developed a large Twitter presence’ to ‘Grew Twitter account by 3k followers in Q2’.

  • Avoid unnecessary adjectives

Keep it simple and try not to use unnecessary adjectives or adverbs. For example, ‘skillfully negotiated contracts’ would become ‘negotiated contracts’.

  • Thoroughly check for spelling and grammar errors

Formatting and grammatical errors can be the difference between success and failure. Make sure you check your résumé at least twice, and if possible ask someone else to review it before you submit it.

Chris Matthews, MAILONLINE

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 10 October 2022

CVs branded outdated by younger workers

Many young workers are finding CVs an obstacle to finding their dream job, with 43% saying they are an outdated recruitment model, according to research from software company Arctic Shores.

Half of the young people asked said they did not think they had sufficient experience on their CVs to get jobs, with 39% pushing for an assessment on personality instead.

Graham Trevor, group HR director at recruitment company Randstad UK and Ireland, said that there is progress being made on recruitment methods outside of CVs.

Speaking to HR magazine, he said: “The CV is useful but it’s not the only recruitment tool. There’s already a trend toward not using CV’s as a way to reduce bias. There’s plenty of innovation in the recruitment space and there is further hope for young people with limited experience and slimmer CVs.

“My advice to young people putting a CV together is don’t get hung up on your lack of experience. It’s likely many candidates are in the same situation as you. Let your character shine through and it may make you stand out above other applicants that have more direct experience.”

The majority of people surveyed felt that companies weren’t properly assessing their potential, with 87% arguing too much emphasis was put on past experience.

This was contributing to a cycle where candidates are overlooked because they don’t have experience, yet they can’t get it as nobody will hire them.

It has led to a confidence crisis among young workers, with 75% of respondents arguing they did not think they had the skills needed to get a new job, and almost half (48%) said they had dropped out of the recruitment process early even though they were interested in the job. 

Tony Prevost, HR director EMEA at training platform Skillsoft, said employers should look for different ways to assess candidates.

Speaking to HR magazine, he said: “More employers should look beyond traditional hiring requirements and consider STAR candidates, workers who are Skilled Through Alternative Routes.

“With demand for digital-native talent at a premium and the very nature of job roles evolving fast, apprenticeships can help bridge the gap, both for the skills needed within the organisation today and looking ahead to the future. Mutually beneficial, employees can perfect their core craft and branch out to learn new skills , building a strong growth foundation for the wider organisation.”

Arctic Shores surveyed 500 people aged 16 to 24 in July 2022.

HR Magazine, Nosa Omoigui

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 July 2022

8 in 10 of the UK’s most popular jobs have a gender pay gap

Eight in 10 of the UK’s most popular job roles have a gender pay gap in favour of men, new data has found.

This is according to CIPHR, which has reviewed the latest stats from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) regarding men’s and women’s median hourly rates of pay to find out which occupations, industries and geographical locations have the widest and smallest gender pay gaps in 2021.

The ONS website explained that the gender pay gap is “calculated as the difference between average hourly earnings (excluding overtime) of men and women as a proportion of men’s average hourly earnings (excluding overtime)”.

What the data found

The study revealed that 65 of the top 78 jobs (83%) with the largest number of workers in the UK, pay men more on average.

Over 17.6million people are employed in these occupations (9.4million women and 8.2million men), with the average gender pay gap (as of April 2021) ranging from -13.8% for EAs and personal assistants to 30.8% for financial managers and directors.

While many of these roles do have a lower gender pay gap than the UK average, the women in these roles are still paid less than men overall, the study uncovered.

The recent survey from CIPHR also found that most workers underestimated their employer’s gender pay gap, with over half (57%) believing that no wage gap exists where they work.

Gender pay gaps

Elsewhere, the data found that the most popular three occupations for 2021 are sales and retail assistants, care workers and home carers, and administrative/ clerical assistants.

The average gender pay gaps for these roles are five per cent, 1.7% and 10.5% respectively, despite women comprising the majority of workers in them.

In addition to this, nursing is the fourth largest occupation in the country, 86% of which are women. It has a four per cent gender pay gap in favour of men.

In the UK, women make up the majority (64%+) of the workforce in seven of the top ten jobs with the most staff. All except one have gender pay gaps in favour of men.

The ten most popular jobs in 2021, sorted by the widest gender pay gaps, are:

  1. Sales accounts and business development managers (12.5%): 461,600 workers
  2. Other administrative occupations, including admin / clerical assistants (10.5%): 641,100
  3. Bookkeepers, payroll managers and wages clerks (7.9%): 407,500 workers
  4. Elementary storage occupations, including freight handlers and warehouse workers (7.4%): 427,400 workers
  5. Sales and retail assistants (5%): 866,900 workers
  6. Programmers and software development professionals (4.8%): 421,400
  7. Nurses (4%): 547,000 workers
  8. Care workers and home carers (1.7%): 730,500 workers
  9. Primary and nursery education teaching professionals (1.6%): 401,200 workers
  10. Kitchen and catering assistants (-1%): 404,100 workers

On the other end of the scale, the five jobs with the widest gender pay gaps in favour of women include midwives (-54.9%), barristers and judges (-34.2%), veterinary nurses (-33.1%), mechanical engineers (-26.7%), and special needs education teaching professionals (-25.5%).

David Richter, Director of Marketing at CIPHR, said: “Using the latest official data from the ONS, we aimed to discover just how many of the UK’s most popular jobs, that’s occupational roles held by at least 100,000 people or more, are affected by a gender pay gap.

“Disappointingly, most of the job roles highlighted in CIPHR’s study still have a pay gap that favours men. Even after years of reforms and inclusive policies and initiatives, there’s still a long way to go to close the gap.”

HR Grapevine

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 July 2022

Frustrated home workers in danger of causing IT ‘security crisis’

Stringent security measures were an immediate concern in the move to home working, as gaining access to sensitive information and work-based discussions progressed remotely. However, new data from HP has found that younger workers are growing frustrated over accessibility.

In fact, the data found that over half of 18 to 24-year-olds are more worried about meeting deadlines than exposing their organization to a data breach, suggesting a growing level of apathy that may well result in fatal errors.

As a result of this rising tension between IT teams and younger workers, safety specialists have allegedly been forced to compromise over measures and relax levels of security to prevent younger ‘digital native’ workers from circumventing them.

Up to 76% of IT teams admitted that, as a result of tension with other teams, security took a backseat to business continuity during the pandemic, while 91% felt pressure to compromise security for business continuity.

Yet despite the danger of leaving sensitive information vulnerable to hacks from cyber attackers, 48% of workers surveyed stated that they saw security measures as a waste of time, a number that rises to 64% among 18 to 24-year-olds.

And whilst many workers may well be returning to offices with stronger security protocols, the future hybrid working approach does seem to be a cause for concern. 83% of IT teams believe the increase in home workers has created a “ticking time bomb” for a corporate network breach.

“The fact that workers are actively circumventing security should be a worry for any CISO, this is how breaches can be born,” said Ian Pratt, Global Head of Security for Personal Systems, HP.

“If security is too cumbersome and weighs people down, then people will find a way around it. Instead, security should fit as much as possible into existing working patterns and flows, with technology that is unobtrusive, secure-by-design and user-intuitive,” he said.

The report highlights that many security teams have made efforts to curb user behaviour to keep data safe. 91% have updated security policies to account for the rise in working from home, while 78% have restricted access to websites and applications.

But these controls often create friction for users; 80% of IT teams experienced push back from users who do not like controls being put on them at home. A further 67% added that they experience complaints about this on a weekly basis.

Pratt added that businesses need to educate workers on the need for security, and find a middle ground between perspectives. “To create a more collaborative security culture, we must engage and educate employees on the growing cybersecurity risks, while IT teams need to better understand how security impacts workflows and productivity,” he concluded.

HR Grapevine, Kieran Howells

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 July 2022

Commuting costs stop workers from returning to office

The cost of commuting is drastically impacting the number of workers heading back to the office.

Research from YouGov and spend management solutions company Emburse found 68% of British workers would return to the office full-time if their commuting costs were paid for in full, compared to the 27% of those surveyed who said they wouldn’t return even if costs were covered. 

The poll also showed a divide between age groups when it came to commuting benefits.

Those aged between 35 to 44 were most tempted by a fully paid commute (72%), while 67% of those aged 55 and over said they would still prefer to work remotely. 

Employee benefits expert Steve Herbert suggested that the pandemic had allowed people to become too used to home working conditions.

Speaking to HR magazine, he said: “The issue is probably caused by the sheer duration of the UK’s pandemic restrictions.

“Home working, and its associated savings in commuting costs, has effectively become the norm for many workers. At a time when the cost of living is at a high not seen in decades, it follows that few workers will be keen to engage again with these additional costs,   some may in fact not be able to afford to at all.”

The practicalities of implementing paid commuting may be too complicated for businesses, he argued. 

Herbert added: “Offering commuting costs as a benefit would be a real challenge. The costs would vary dramatically from one worker to another depending on distance and working location, and then there is also the impact of taxation on such payments to consider too.

“The other option is to allow workers to continue to work from home, just as they have done for two years already. This involves no extra outlay from the employer, and avoids the extra complications.”

YouGov’s poll of 724 office workers across the UK found that paid commuting was the second biggest incentive that could entice workers back to the office, as it was favoured by 52% of those surveyed.

four-day work week was the most popular incentive at 59%, while 51% could be tempted by more paid holidays.

Emburse’s general manager and senior vice president EMEA Kenny Eon added that businesses should do their best to ease financial concerns of their employees during the cost of living crisis. 

He said: “With the huge fuel price increase and the overall cost of living squeeze, subsidised travel could gain momentum as a meaningful perk. Also, with more employers launching ESG metrics, encouraging employees to move from cars to public transport could help them achieve their sustainability goals.

Incentivising staff to make the change by subsidising the cost of taking the tube, bus or train could be a sound investment”

HR Magazine, Nosa Omoigui

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 13 July 2022

Proximity bias stopping employers from finding new talent

Companies equating hard work with being in the office are living in the past according to Paul Hamer, CEO of construction company Sir Robert McAlpine.

Speaking on a panel about flexible working at the 2022 CIPD Festival of Work on 16 June, Hamer said: “It’s an issue of maturity. Especially pre-pandemic, there was an agenda of ‘if I can’t see you then you must not be working.’

“If we can hold executive board meetings over teams remotely, then why can’t people work from home remotely? You have to lead from the top.”

Without the promise of flexible working, Hamer said companies will find it harder to attract new employees.

He added: “There’s no way we’re going to get that talent that’s going to sit at a desk for 40 hours a week, its impossible.

“From my experience, I work harder at home than in the office. If it can work for me it can work for anybody.”

Alex Ritchie, co-CEO of charity GlobalGiving, argued that adopting flexible working can be beneficial for employers as well as employees, especially at a time when high quality staff are in shorter supply and higher demand.

A hybrid working model she added had helped the company expand its talent pool.

She said: “We’ve been able employ talent from all over the UK, which for us is a real game changer. It’s such a competitive employment market at the moment, and we were originally restricting ourselves to London.

“In the last nine months we’ve employed people from Bradford, Manchester, Bournemouth, and that’s made a real difference to the quality of staff we’ve been able to employ. Being such a small organisation, we would never have been able to do that before.”

HR Magazine, Nosa Omoigui

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 16 December 2021

Hiring over-70s could add BILLIONS to UK economy

Hiring over-70s could add BILLIONS to UK economy and create ‘vibrant’ workforce

One in ten over-70s are choosing to either head back to or stay longer in part or full-time work as a direct result of the pandemic, a trend which could see billions of pounds pour into the UK economy, according to a new study.

Results from the Retirement Villages Group’s ‘Back on Track’ research shows that, post-lockdown, slowing down is the last thing on the minds of many older adults. In fact, one in three (36%) over 70s say that they have spent the last 16 months reflecting on their life goals, leading to an increased desire to now make up for lost time in both their personal and professional lives.

Going back to work, whether for financial reasons or in pursuit of a purposeful, active older lifestyle, is a core part of that ambition for many (seven per cent seek to return to work, three per cent to delay retirement).

As the number of UK job vacancies reaches its highest level since pre-pandemic, according to ONS figures,

Retirement Villages Group has calculated that one in ten over 70s heading back to or staying in work could add as much as £1.8billion to the UK economy each year. Moreover, it promotes a much-needed shift in perspective about the active and valuable role older adults can and want to play in British society.

Employment opportunities for over 70s brings massive benefits for the individual too, whether that’s improving their financial or mental health. Among those that have or plan to go back to work, over half (52%) agree that the main motive is to boost their finances, for a third (33%) it’s to alleviate boredom, and a fifth (21%) want to contribute to society.

Nearly half (48%) of people over the age of 70 who were surveyed said that the single greatest thing that would support older people wanting to go back into the workplace is reduced stigma around later life and misperceptions of what older adults contribute economically, socially, and culturally.

Over one in three (39%) said that seeing more age diversity in the workplace would give them greater confidence to consider working opportunities themselves. Yet, encouragingly, the research also found that one in four (27%) older adults believe the pandemic has led to a more widespread view that older people have valuable life skills that society can benefit from.

Will Bax, CEO of Retirement Villages Group, said: “Today’s research confirms that older adults have a critical role in ensuring the ongoing diversity and vibrancy of our society and economy. The pandemic has brought this reality into sharp focus, with many people over 70 forced to isolate for prolonged periods, curbing the active, independent and sociable lifestyles they would normally lead and temporarily separating them from communities.

“It’s vital, as we unlock from the pandemic, that we continue to reappraise how we view the great contribution of people over 70 to our culture and economy. Independent, positive ageing matters, not only to the long-term health and wellbeing of individuals, by keeping people out of hospitals and care homes for longer, but also to our society which is enriched by older people playing an active part.

“Our model is based on the belief that communities are more opportune places for everyone when they are diverse and multiple generations live side by side to learn from and support each other, for the benefit of all.”

Several firms have been vocal in recent months about the benefits that mature workers can bring to the workplace.

‘Vast, untapped talent’



In August, the UK’s largest regional accountancy and business advisor to SMEs, Azets, revealed a plan to “tap into the mature jobs market to fill at least ten per cent of its 650 job vacancies over the next year.”

As originally reported by The Times, the 6,500-strong firm hopes to benefit from mentoring and reverse mentoring between staff of different ages and levels of experience.

Anna Murphy, Head of Group Resourcing at Azets, previously told the publication: “While it’s common for top firms to focus only on hiring and developing young, ambitious trainees, there is a vast, untapped talent pool of retired people and those looking to return to work after a break who often aren’t ready to retire or want to progress in their careers while being able to fit work around other commitments.”

Mature recruits could plug talent shortage

With the impending skills shortage worrying Britain at present, businesses need to implement strategies to retain and upskill their workforce, and taking on older, more experienced workers could provide a much-needed boost.

But according to data released in Workforce’s 2019 Ageism in the Workplace Study, the number of age-related discrimination charges filed with employers and the EEOC by workers aged 65-plus doubled from 1990 to 2017.

The same study noted that 44% of employees reported that they or someone they knew had experienced age discrimination in the workplace, whilst 21% said they had faced age discrimination themselves.

HR Grapevine, Liam Soutar

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 16 December 2021

A quarter of workers judge colleagues on their appearance

A quarter (25%) of workers ranked appearance as the most important factor when meeting someone for the first time at work, followed by personal hygiene (23%) and then someone’s job title (17%).

Revealing potential biases in the workplace, a clean-shaven appearance (13%) was rated more attractive than facial hair (6%).

Despite remote work challenging some workplace norms, smart clothes (19%) were more favourable than casual clothes (9%).

Making eye contact was also important for 21%, and it was the top factor that people felt made others seem intelligent (15%) and trustworthy (20%).

For employers looking to tackle such biases in the workplace D&I consultant Huma Qazi said knowing the difference between appearances and attractiveness is crucial.

Qazi told HR magazine: “If we’re talking about appearance as opposed to attractiveness, they are different.

“Physical attractiveness is a privilege within itself. From an early age and throughout our lives, it can provide additional advantage, special treatment, additional access and open doors.

“Appearance is more adaptable, can be flexed and synonymous with one’s identity and personal style.”

To cultivate a more inclusive workplace that doesn’t rely so much on appearances, Qazi advised HR to look at the language they use in any selection processes.

“Comments such as the ‘right look’, ‘looks the part’ or ‘fits our style’ in such decision-making processes are red flags as it can be indicative of a culture that disregards or gives less importance to capability, competence and the right qualifications and experience to do the job,” she added.

Overall, almost half (46%) of Brits admitted to judging people based on their appearance and agreed that their first impressions are usually right.

Roshni Patel, professional services manager at contact lens supplier Lenstore which commissioned the survey said she was hopeful that more hybrid working will challenge people’s perceptions when it comes to appearances.

“Workplaces growing mindful not to judge someone by their appearance is certainly a step towards ensuring inclusivity,” she told HR magazine.

“Post pandemic working is sure to accelerate this as working from home sees a natural evolution to wearing casual attire as well as different interview processes, as some colleagues have never met face to face.”

Lenstore’s survey was conducted in July 2021 and is based on a poll of 1,000 people in the UK.

HR Magazine, Beau Jackson

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 16 December 2021

I don’t care what time you start work

IBM chief tells staff ‘I don’t care what time you start work’. The head of one of the world’s leading tech firms has denounced rigid work structures by revealing he “doesn’t care” what time staff start work.

As reported by the New York Times, IBM’s CEO and Chairman Arvind Krishna said he is not concerned by what time his employees clock in or out, whether it be 5am or 5pm, as long as they get the job done.

The 59-year-old told the NYT: “Why should I, as an employer, care as long as you can get the work done and you’re highly productive? I should not try to be overly dictatorial about that.”

He went on: “We have done a social experiment over the last 18 months.

“The world where the clock tower rings and everybody goes to work, then the clock tower rings and then you all go back home, that’s over.”

Krishna added, however, that IBM hopes to bring more workers back to the office, stating that anyone who aims to climb the career ladder should be spending time in the office.

“For a certain kind of work, let me call it creative work, as well as decision-making, it is much easier and faster to do it when you are together,” Krishna told NYT.

“If you’re satisfied that the work you’re going to do is of an individual nature, you can do that remotely,” he said. “If the work you want to do is leadership, you have to spend some time in the office.”

Flexible working policies

IBM’s relaxed approach to working hours reflects the growing post-lockdown trend of hybrid and remote working policies, a period which has sparked a step change in the way that employees and businesses go about work.

This has resulted in many employers giving staff greater flexibility over where, when and how they structure their working days.

One of the most recent employers to follow suit and let its employees set their own working hours, giving them ultimate flexibility over their work structures, is Love Energy Savings (LES).

The policy ‘Flexible-Flexible’, provides colleagues the freedom to work from a location of their choosing, was introduced in response to the changing nature of work post-covid.

At the time, the firm’s CEO, Phil Foster, said: “For more and more people, the traditional ways of working just don’t fit in with how we live our lives today.

He said: “The rigid pattern of nine-to-five, Monday to Friday is no longer fit for purpose. That’s why we’re delighted to implement our Flexible-Flexible Policy.

“Not only does it allow our colleagues to work from anywhere in the UK, they can also choose the hours that suit them and their families,” Foster added.

The benefits for HR

When implementing any new initiative, the people function will likely be thinking about how this could benefit the HR agenda.

One main benefit of LES’ policy, according to Anthony Gregory, the firm’s Head of People, is that staff have the freedom to do their contracted hours in a way that suits them.

Gregory previously told HR Grapevine: “It demonstrates that as an employer we recognise the challenges of striking a healthy balance between work and life, while signaling that we empathise with our workforce.”

Another benefit to this, according to Gregory, is that by enabling staff to set up their own hours, the firm is “highlighting the trust we have in them”.

Previous articles have pointed towards the importance of this. For example, an Insight Link article found that a trusting workplace can be good for morale and motivation, as well as for increasing loyalty and willingness to stay with a company.

Aside from this, it is possible that a move like this could help with the energy retailer’s talent attraction strategy.

He explained: “The traditional ways of working just don’t fit in with how we live our lives today. In the coming years flexi hours and flexi locations will become increasingly standard for employers to offer.”

With EY’s 2021 Work Reimagined Employee Survey finding that more than half (54%) of employees surveyed would consider leaving their job post-covid if not given some form of flexibility in where and when they work, flexible working policies displayed by IBM and LES could help HR attract and retain the talent they need.

HR Grapevine, Liam Soutar

ContinueMore articles

Blog · 16 December 2021

The worst workplace emails you can send

Work emails are a nuisance for most employees; whether they are to chase a colleague on a task, to set out a meeting agenda or prompt a client to get in touch, composing them and reading them takes up a large portion of the working day.

Not only that, but they can also distract us away from our workloads and the important tasks we have set out, encouraging us to procrastinate and put off responsibilities. This has been echoed in research by The McKinsey Global Institute, which found that an average employee spends 13 hours a week reading and responding to emails. This equates to a total of 660 hours spent on completely reactive, low value work.

These email interruptions can also have a drastic impact on productivity. In fact, a study by the Danwood Group found that it takes an average of 64 seconds to recover from an email interruption and return to work at the same work rate as before. In addition, this overload in emails can also increase stress levels among workers. A team of researchers at UC Irvine and the US Army discovered this after they tracked participants with heart rate monitors. They found that limiting email access dramatically reduced stress levels.

Now, with employees working from home, emails are taking up a large portion of our day when it comes to maintaining communication and sending across documents. However, it’s important to point out that there are several types of emails that should be avoided, as reported by Forbes. To ensure you avoid these at all costs, Executive Grapevine has revealed what these are:

1. War and peace

During the working day, it is likely an employee will receive a long-winded email that offers no insight. When this happens the recipient tends to dart around the copy to find the main points or key words to give them some direction, however when this isn’t possible, it means dedicating a large portion of time to deconstruct it, or coming back to it a later date.

If you find yourself guilty of constructing these types of emails, instead make sure that your emails are brief, focussed and to the point. A good way of setting this out is by using bullet points and allowing for more white space so they are readable for the recipients.

2. Duck, duck, goose

An email that asks for a single action but is sent out to multiple colleagues is one of the most confusing, and can lead to the intended task being forgotten about or falling through the cracks as every recipient claims to be unsure of who was supposed to deliver it.

Of course, in the workplace several co-workers may need to be included on an email chain so that everyone is aware of what is going on. However, when a task needs to be carried out, it’s important to specify who you are delegating this to, making it clear for everyone involved who is responsible for what.

3. Avoiding communication

Throughout this period, employees have grown to rely on tech to communicate with co-workers as physical interactions have been diminished as a result of the pandemic. This has transpired into emails, with colleagues using this form of interaction when they don’t want to actually talk to someone. This can lead to frustration and confusion as sometimes a simple call or video chat can solve a situation, while an email can often complicate it.

Instead, try and avoid a reliance on email to communicate with others. Depending on what the situation is, think about what the best mode of contact would be to solve the matter and speak to someone direct.

My Grapevine, Jade Burke

ContinueMore articles

Nevard Roland Executive Search · 14 Bellevue Mansions, Bellevue Rd, Clevedon, Bristol BS21 7NU

Sourcecall Ltd: Registered in England Number 2214411